Introduction
Canada is a vast country made up of regions that have very different landscapes and characteristics. This diversity is what makes Canada unique as a federation, however, it also leads to regional tensions. Geographic differences are only one of many potential points of contention between provincial governments or regions and the federal government. Canadians are all aware of the tensions between Quebec and the federal government, as the separatist movement received a lot of attention. However, there is another regional group that also has many tensions with the Canadian government: the Western provinces. Separatism has been discussed by these provinces as well, and there are many factors that contribute to their discontent.
The
…show more content…
Western Provinces The term “Western provinces” is generally seen to include British-Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba (Hanson, 1975, p. 105). However, in certain circumstances only three of the four provinces are included, depending on the criteria of the factors being discussed. For example, in terms of natural resources, British-Columbia is the most unique of the four, and is occasionally not included (Hanson, 1975, p. 108). In fact, British-Columbians tend to feel distinct from the so called “prairie” provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba (Lawson, 2005, p. 135). From a political perspective, Manitoba is the most unique. While the other three provinces tend to have Conservative provincial governments, Manitoba is more likely to have an NDP provincial government, which can lead to its exclusion from the category of Western provinces. This is also due in part to its proximity to Central Canada, as well as other factors to be discussed later on. The West was the last part of Canada to be settled, and it was done so due to the potential for agriculture and oil (Hanson, 1975, p. 108). The Western provinces are economically reliant on their natural resources (Lawson, 2005, p. 133). The types of resources are similar, though they do vary slightly by province. British-Columbia is the most unique, with its resources being petroleum, metal deposits, forestry, and fishing (Hanson, 1975, p. 108). Alberta has the tar sands, petroleum, and a strong agricultural industry, while Saskatchewan also has petroleum, and agriculture, as well as metal and potash deposits (Hanson, 1975, p. 108). Manitoba has fewer natural resources, with an agricultural industry and metal deposits (Hanson, 1975, p. 108). These natural resources are the root of one of the many causes of Western alienation and discontent that will be discussed shortly. Alienation Robert Lawson defines political alienation as “the alienation of citizens from political representatives, processes of political decision-making, and institutions of representative government” (2005, p.
136). When citizens feel as though their input through voting does not have an impact on policy, or that their representative does not actually represent them and their interests, alienation can develop. In the case of Western alienation, these characteristics are regionalised within the four Western provinces because they believe that they have similar concerns and complaints due to their similar traits.
These feelings of alienation can and have led to discussions of separatism, and the West leaving Canada to form their own sovereign nation, much in the same way that Quebec has threatened. Separatist sentiment is strongest in Alberta, and weakest in Manitoba, most likely due to its proximity to Ontario and less Conservative provincial political views, making them more agreeable with the historically frequent federal Liberal governments than the other Western provinces (Hanson, 1975, p. 104).
…show more content…
Causes The causes of Western alienation are varied and many. They range from economic concerns related to natural resources to transportation, and from political representation to perceived favouritism of Ontario and Quebec. The first point of contention was at the very beginning, when British-Columbia joined Canada four years after Confederation, in 1871 (The Economist, 2004, p. 39). The federal government promised them a transcontinental rail link that would be completed by the year 1883, and it ended up being built late (The Economist, 2004, p. 39). This was not a good start for Western provinces within the Dominion of Canada. Transportation within the Western provinces as well as across Canada would prove to be a major point of contention as time passed, and still is today. Costs to travel from Western Canada into Central Canada are very high, and the trips are made lengthy by train due to the number of stops along the way (Hanson, 1975, p. 104). Due to the Western reliance on natural resources, transportation is incredibly important in terms of being able to export the resources for a profit (Berdahl, 2011A, p. 259). Many find the inter-provincial and transcontinental transportation options to be insufficient and inadequate, which reinforces the idea that the federal government does not care about the interests and concerns of the Western provinces, who are in need of efficient transportation in order to sell their products for a profit and become economically stable. Natural resources are one of the largest points of contention between the Western provinces and the federal government. From the very beginning, natural resources have been a source of dispute. Both the federal and provincial governments want to have control over them in order to keep the profits. In the beginning, the Western provinces were denied control of their resources so that they could be used for the national benefit (Rutan, 1982, p. 79). Very shortly after British-Columbia joined the federation in 1871, complaints emerged about them feeling exploited for their resources (The Economist, 2004, p. 39). In 1870, as a result of Manitoba’s resources being under federal jurisdiction, there was a rebellion led by Louis Riel in order to claim control over the natural resources (Lawson, 2005, p. 130). Today, any attempts by the federal government to interfere at all with the natural resources in the Western provinces is met with hostility.
There is a strong sentiment that the Western provinces are exploited by Central Canada for their resources, and then disregarded completely (Ferres, 1983, p. 99). Westerners were not fond of the National Energy Program, which was put in place in the 1980s by Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s Liberal government, giving the federal government more control over Western oil and its profits, to put it simply (Ferres, 1983, p. 97). Economists have said that petroleum revenues could actually be higher if Alberta specifically were to separate, which is simply fuel to the separatist fire (Hanson, 1975, p. 104). As well, Westerners believe that the federal government in Ottawa is ignorant and lacks knowledge about agriculture, meaning that they do not make helpful policy decisions for farmers and other labourers within the agricultural industry (Hanson, 1975, p.
116). The sentiment that the federal government is ignorant about Western issues is another factor that leads to feelings of alienation. One of the main causes of this sentiment is the fact that throughout Canadian history, the Liberal Party is the party that most frequently forms government. Unfortunately, there is very little Liberal support in the Western provinces (Ferres, 1983, p. 97). Western discontent is found to be higher during Liberal governments; discontent was high during Trudeau’s leadership, declined during Mulroney’s Conservative government, rose again when Liberal Chretien became Prime Minister, and has been slowly declining ever since Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party formed government in 2006 (Berdahl, 2010, p. 2-4). In this way, partisanship is definitely at play when it comes to Western alienation. There is also a sentiment that the MPs, even the ones elected in the West from the Conservative Party, are an elite that do not really represent the typical Western citizen (Lawson, 2005, p. 130). This issue of representation leads to the idea of Senate reform, which is another factor contributing to Western discontent.
The Meech Lake accord was a set of constitutional amendments that were designed to persuade Quebec Province to accept the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 (Brooks 152). This accord derives its name from the Meech Lake, where these negotiations were held by Mulroney Brian, the Canadian Prime Minister, and the ten premiers of the ten Canadian Provinces (Brooks 211). By the time the Canadian constitution was being implemented, Quebec was the only province that had not consented to it. Somehow, the partition of the constitution in 1982 was carried out without Quebec’s agreement, but it was still bound by the same law. Attempts were made to persuade this province to sign the constitution, which it agreed to do but only after its five demands are fulfilled by the Canadian government. Unfortunately, these demands were not met and this accord failed in 1990, when two provincial premiers failed to approve it. This paper answers the question whether Quebec asked for too much during the Meech Lake Accord negotiations.
Although, Quebec’s population share many similar characteristics amongst one another it is not essential to decide “the people” (Heard, 2013). To be considered a state you must represent all the people in it. Quebec prefers independences for the reason of a commonality
To start off, I’ll be writing about the life of people in British North America and its significance towards unifying Canada, as well as background knowledge of conflicts that existed. Life in British North America was changing at an alarming rate. New technology and services were being introduced such as railways and steamships. Industries such as building, producing and farming were being introduced. This was in part due to the many immigrants from Britain and France who’d settled. This was dreadful for the First Nations as their land had been taken away even more so than before. More resources were needed for the growing crowd so trade agreements were made. As more people came, the First Nations were even more distanced from the Europeans. Meanwhile, the French and the British wanted the other’s culture to be erased from the
The Quebec referendum that was held in 1995 was a second round of vote that was meant to give the residents of the Quebec province in Canada the chance to determine whether they wanted to secede from Canada and thus establish Quebec as a sovereign state. Quebec has had a long history of wanting to secede from Canada, considering that it is the Canadian providence that is predominantly inhabited by the French-speaking people, whose political relationship with the rest of the Canadian provinces, mostly inhabited by the English-speaking people has been characterized by conflicting ideologies . Thus, the 1995 referendum was not the first political attempt to have Quebec gain its own independence. The discussion holds that the Quebec 1995 referendum would have had both positive and negative implications. Therefore, this discussion seeks to analyze the political consequences that would have f...
Stevenson, Garth. "Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations." Canadian Politics in the 21st Century. Ed. Michael S. Whittington and Glen Williams. Scarborough, Ont.: Nelson Thomson Learning, 2000. 85-1
In the written piece What Canada Means to Me an example of feeling detached from the rest of the world is: We seem to suffer from a lost identity, ungrounded in anything concrete, detached from both outer and back-home society; this shows that once Native American children were taken away from their home and stripped of their beliefs they felt unwanted by both sides of society. To return home was never the same and they were treated differently while out in Canadian society being of a different culture they were out casted, which left a constant feeling of un-belonging and detachment from
Newman, Garfield et al. Canada A Nation Unfolding. Toronto: Mc Graw – Hill Ryerson Limited, 2000.
Quebec has struggled with a need to be maitres chez nous “masters of their own house” (Young, 1998). Many attempts at resolving Quebec's issues has resulted in tensions from both sides. Because Quebec has a strong national identity, and do not define themselves as strictly Canadian, Quebec is seen as difficult, unyielding and discontented. Quebec's separation perhaps is inedible and the future of Canada questionable. Canada without Quebec will bring about many complications and whether there is a rest of Canada (ROC) after Quebec a major challenge. Western alienation and the lack of representation in federal affairs will be a factor; moreover, past actions and historical events may have turned Canada into a time bomb, and the deterioration of the provinces the only sulotion. How First Ministers react to Quebec's sovereignty regarding economic factors, political structure, and constitutional issues will be of great importance. Whether emotional issues will play a major role in decision making is subjective; however, it is fair to say that it will be an emotionally charged event and it could either tear apart the ROC or fuse it together. Placing emphasis on investigating what keeps Canada together is perhaps the key to Canada's future, and salvaging a relationship with Quebec.
The Confederation act of 1867 without question has had a major influence on the status of contemporary Canada. It has helped shape Canada into one of the worlds most politically and economically powerful countries; a country that is strong, independent, and united. There was a series of events which led to the confederation of Canada, some which are more significant than others. However, I believe that despite the significance of events such as the British encouragement of uniting its North American colonies, the central and key reason for confederation was the fear of potential American (Yankee) inhabitance (whether by persuasion or invasion) of the divided and vast British North American colonies, and the way that the “Fathers of Confederation” were able to take advantage of this situation and persuade reluctant colonies to join Confederation. A strong and united nation could not be easily invaded or bought. These essential factors will be discussed in the paragraphs to come.
Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they well tell you that is unfortunately not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda. Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the root causes and origin of Quebec Separatism, the current state of Quebec Separatism and finally how we as a society can act towards Quebec Separatism.
Frist, federalism is the division of power between the provinces and the federal government (Cutler 2010, 3). As well, Federal systems tend to be made up of multiple parts, which do not necessarily work together (Brock 2008, 3). There has been an increase on the study of federalism in recent years, which has created a more in-depth look at how federalism impacts the government. (Farfard Rocher 2009, 294). There are two aspects of federalism and both of them put limitations on the influence of the prime minister. The first is called political asymmetry; this encompasses the various attitudes of the different provinces such as the culture, economic, social and political conditions and how it shapes the relationship between the provincial and federal governments (Brock 2008, 4). This can create a problem for the federal government because it means that they may ha...
Regionalism is a growing concern for Canadians` as it affects economic stability, nationalism and western alienation. The economic stability is reliant on the regions having strong economic bases (Stilborn, 19). Nationalism with Quebec is a prime example of how distinct regional cultures hinder Canada’s unity, as they want to separate from Canada, while still having the federal Canadian government financially support them. Western Alienation is also a prime political culture that is regionally distinct.
Many people across the globe argue that nationalism within Canada is simply not feasible. It is said that we as a people, differ so greatly with our diverse cultures, religions, and backgrounds that we cannot come together and exist together as a strong, united nation. In his book, Lament for a Nation, George Grant tells the reader that “…as Canadians we attempted a ridiculous task in trying to build a conservative nation in the age of progress, on a continent we share with the most dynamic nation on earth. The current history is against us.” (1965) Originally directed towards the Bomarc Missile Crisis, the book argues that whatever nationalism Canada had was destroyed by globalization as well as the powerful American sphere of influence. Although it is true that the book was initially written as a response to the events that took place in the late 1950s, many of the points are still valid today.
individuals, society, or work. Some sociologists believe that alienation is inevitably produced not by the individual but by the shallowness and the lack of individuality in modern society. The concept of alienation has been held to account for behaviour patterns. as diverse as motiveless violence and total immobility. Alienation is a state in which the creations of humanity appear to humans as alien objects.
THE TERM "alienation" in normal usage refers to a feeling of separateness, of being alone and apart from others. For Marx, alienation was not a feeling or a mental condition, but an economic and social condition of class society--in particular, capitalist society.