Were Romans Really Democratic

326 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Features of Athenian and classical democracy

Rome was a so called Republic, But there were a few things that romans did that makes them a little bit of a democracy, along with things that make them very republic. My beliefs are that they were not really democratic but mostly a republic. Even though they may seem not as republican they really are.
One evidence that proves that they do have a bit of democracy in them is unlike the Greeks, Romans would let not just rich people but poor people and liberated slaves vote on the legislature as well. This would definitely qualify them to be more equal for the “people”. In democracy they are all about the people and since Roman laws give more of a variety of people to vote and made it way more equivalent.
The government how ever was not subsumed

Show More
Related

  • Was Athens Truly Democratic Dbq Analysis

    277 Words  | 1 Pages

    Athens was not truly democratic because there is evidence in both Document C, Document D and Document E to support this claim. Athens was not truly democratic because not everybody had the choice to vote. In Document C, it states "Percentage of Population Able to Vote: 12%." This shows that since only adult male citizens who were over the age of eighteen could vote, which left 88% of the population unable to vote. Democracy is when every citizen has an equal right to vote and takes part in government. This is not the case in ancient Athens, as shown in Document C. Document D states, “It is less democratic by narrowing down the concept of demos to mean the adult male citizens in assembly.” Demos means the

    Read More

  • How Did Greece And Rome Influence America

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    Greece and Rome’s governments included many democratic aspects that continue to be used in modern

    Read More

  • Roman Republic Dbq

    396 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rome was kind of a democy it had it’s flaws but by its voting system it makes it a democy. In document C only 2% of Roman’s voted and these votes by the people even though it was few that makes it a democracy. In document C you had to be in Rome to vote which is far because they wouldn’t want an outsider to vote on things that were going on in Rome. In document B poor rich and the freed slaves could vote and for it’s time that is amazing that the poor and the freed slaves could vote. Rome definitely had it’s flaws but for it’s time it was a good democracy but in our fews we don’t think the Rome Republic was a good democy at all.

    Read More

  • The Faculty Senate at Truman State University

    3088 Words  | 7 Pages

    Democracy spread from Athens to other Grecian city-states and eventually to other areas in that part of the world. One of the most famous early democracies or representative governments was the Roman Senate. However, this occurred because of the domination of Athens and Greece by Rome and the local governments, more stable that the militaristic style of Rome, proved to be stronger and a better decisions .

    Read More

  • Comparing the Roman Empire and the United States of America

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rome's Republican era began after the overthrow of the last Roman King Tarquin Superbus by Lucius Brutus in 509 BC(1), the Senate was ruled the by the people of Rome. The Roman Republic was governed by a largely complex constitution, which established many checks and balances, so no man could have complete control. The evolution of the constitution was heavily influenced by the struggle between the patricians and the other prominent Romans who were not from the nobility. Early in Rome’s history, the patricians controlled the republic, over time, the laws that allowed these individuals to dominate the government were repealed, and the result was the emergence of a the republic which depended on the structure of society, rather than the law, to maintain its dominance. This is similar to the creation of the American system of government. Starting with the over throw of t...

    Read More

  • The Political Decay of the Roman Republic

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Political Decay of the Roman Republic The fall of the Western Roman Empire was the first example in history on the collapse of a constitutional system which was caused by the internal decay in political, military, economics, and sociological issues. The government was becoming corrupt with bribery. Commanders of the Roman army turned their own army inward towards their own Constitutional systems, fueled by their own ruthless ambition. This paper will talk about how the violence and internal turmoil in 133 B.C.-27 B.C. was what provoked the economic stagnation in the city of Rome and to the end of the Republic and the many corrupt politicians and generals who only thought of nothing more than personal gains and glory. The senate lost control of the Roman military and the reason they rose against the senate was because the senate were no longer able to help manage the social problems or the military and administrative problems of the empire.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Roman Government

    332 Words  | 1 Pages

    Was the Roman republic fair? Were all citizens treated equally in the Ancient Rome? Was the Roman republic good at all or they had problems? The answer is yes, they had problems in some aspects. Also, they were treated different because of their wealth, gender, citizenship, and job.

    Read More

  • The History of the Roman Government

    4408 Words  | 9 Pages

    The Romans have had almost every type of government there is. They've had a kingdom, a republic, a dictatorship, and an empire. Their democracy would be the basis for most modern democracies. The people have always been involved with and loved their government, no matter what kind it was. They loved being involved in the government, and making decisions concerning everyone. In general, the Romans were very power-hungry. This might be explained by the myth that they are descended from Romulus, who's father was Mars, the god of war. Their government loving tendencies have caused many, many civil wars. After type of government, the change has been made with a civil war. There have also been many civil wars between rulers. But it all boils

    Read More

  • The Rome Republic: The Success Of The Roman Republic

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roman Republic had an upstanding infrastructure, a stable social system, and a balanced constitution that solidified Rome’s greatness. Regardless of its achievements, however, the Roman Republic owes much of its success to classical Greek cultures. These cultures, in conjunction with the fundamental values of Roman society, certified Rome as one of the most significant powers the world has ever seen.

    Read More

  • How Is The Roman Republic Democratic

    610 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between the years 509-27 BCE, Rome was considered a republic, which is a type of government in which people vote for representatives to make laws. People were classified as either patricians, plebeians, or slaves within the republic. The patricians were people of the upper class; the ones with all the money. Plebeians were usually farmers, merchants, artisans, or traders and slaves were usually prisoners from the war. During the early Rome expansion, the government was composed of two consuls, the senate, and a dictator when needed. The consuls were responsible for supervising the government and commanding armies. In addition, the senate consisted of three hundred patricians that voted on laws. Lastly, if necessary, a dictator would step in at a time of war, and carry out decisions when there was not enough time to discuss other options within the government . Based on the mentioned information, many people argue about how democratic the Roman Republic really was. The Roman Republic was primarily democratic, however, there were some aspects that could label it as an aristocracy.

    Read More

  • Difference Between a Democracy and a Republic

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Romans called their political system not democracy but republic. Republic is something that belongs to the people. In Rome the right to take part in the governing belonged only to the men and those who had the statute of being citizens. The differences of republic and democracy are because of the origin of the two terms Greek and Latin language. The ancient Greeks discarded the tyranny as well as the disorder. Plato as well as Aristotle stabilized the complete democracy which was not based on the laws, with the power of the crowd and considered it as a form of ruling based on the jealousy and sweet talk of demagogues. Both of them considered the democracy to be wrong kind of state governing. Plato considers the democracy as nice and various public orders but without the necessary governing. The main good of democracy is freedom.

    Read More

  • How Democratic Was Athens: Was Athens A True Democracy?

    339 Words  | 1 Pages

    I believe that athens was a true democracy because they voted only if they were citizens and only if they were old enough to vote. Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. For example the united states is a democracy because all the eligible members in the states have vote. The only bad thing is that not all the eligible member vote in all the states. I believe that it would be much better if all the eligible members in every state voted, because it would be more accurate for all the elections and rules that the government puts.

    Read More

  • The Roman Republic

    939 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Roman Republic began approximately around 509 B.C. when the nobles drove the King and his family out of Rome. This monumental incident helped shape the start to the transformation of the monarchy into a republican governmental system. This is known to have begun by that of the Roman nobles trying to hold their power that they had gained. The Republic was “[a] city-state [which] was the foundation of Greek society in the Hellenic Age; in the Hellenistic Age, Greek cities became subordinate to kingdoms, larder political units ruled by autocratic monarchs” (Perry 105)

    Read More

  • Democracy, Dictatorship, And Theocracy

    1138 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, the word “democracy” comes from two Greek words: “demos” meaning “people” and “cracy” which means “the rule of” (Lansford… Democracy 9). There are two types of democracy and both started during ancient times. One type is direct democracy while the other type is representative democracy. Direct democracy is a form of democracy in which people decide policy initiatives directly (“Advantages”). The earliest direct democracy is said to be the Athenian democracy that started in the 5th century B.C. The main bodies in the Athenian democracy were male citizens because it was not all inclusive since women, foreigners and slaves were excluded from it (Lansford… Democracy 23). In contrast, representative democracy differs from direct democracy because it is founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people (“Advantages”). The Roman Republic was the first government in the Western world to have a representative democracy. It is this model of governance that has inspired many political thinkers over centuries, and today’s modern democracies imitate the Roman more than the Greek democracy (Lansford… Democracy 14). This shows that there is not just one type of democracy, each one is for the people even if the way they agree on...

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: THe Gladiator

    628 Words  | 2 Pages

    The film states that Rome was founded as a Republic. However, Rome was first established in 753 BC as an elective Monarchy. It later in the year 509 BC became a Republic.

    Read More

More about Were Romans Really Democratic

Open Document