Wendy Mcelroy Summary

Wendy McElroy addresses the moral issue on censorship of pornography. She approaches the issue by asking whether or not pornography aids or hinders women. In both articles, she establishes her position, arguing that pornography should not be censored and that it does more good for women than harm. The underlying concerns, however, are where the lines are drawn at censorship and when does a group gains the right to restrict another? McElroy states that the issues with censorship is that it’s very rigid, where even simply tightening the definition of what pornography is can affect publicized works by feminists. It takes away the freedom of people, and McElroy believes that women should be allowed to make their own choices. She follows a more individualist feminism

She argues that everyone can make a decision, whether it’s to partake in pornography or to look the other way. She feels that it is unjust if pro-pornographic feminists are restricted because of the opposing side, and asks a compelling question on whether or not having pornography will deny rights to anyone. She answers her own question and explains that it does not. Although it may offend one’s sensibilities, there are no restrictions to prevent the individual to walk away. I find myself understanding with this logic, but I also find errors with it. McElroy simplifies the effect pornography has and deems it as an easy avoidance. Certain types of pornography, however, place women in violent situations, such as gangbanging, and while the actresses may be consenting, it can paint someone’s perspective that this is an acceptable scenario. Especially now that pornography is so easily available to anyone with internet access, it’s difficult to look away when a random pop-up leading to a porn site appears. Should someone who is easily influenced, such as a child, comes across this and watch these videos, they might perceive this as the norm. McElroy does not take into