Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay overpopulation
Welcome to the Monkey House
In a world where overpopulation, mass birth control, and suicide parlors are the new normal, one man stands against all to bring back the sexuality that the government has systematically depleted. “Welcome to the Monkey House” is a story by Kurt Vonnegut Jr taking place in the not so distant future.
Kurt Vonnegut is a man that was born in the 20’s and it shows in his stories with the crazy ideas of what the future holds. He was a soldier that say some horrible things. One can only wonder if the twisted mind of Kurt was what helped him through his times as a POW or if it is a product of being captive. In this story the theme is overpopulation, ethics, and morality. It seems that Kurt thinks as we progress as humans,
…show more content…
we will be looking for ways to defeat the aging process and in some ways we are but not to the extent he writes about. He assumes overpopulation will happen because people will find a medicine to stop the aging process. I don’t buy into it because it just seems so absurd from the picture he paints in the story. Throughout the story he makes many appeals to the reader that get the gears turning. He pulls at your emotions by telling you that these people have no feeling in their genitalia which makes you wonder how would a life like that be. Also when he rapes Nancy you might use logos to weigh the morality and ethics of Billy’s grotesque actions versus the enlightenment and good he is trying to bring back to a quite literally numbed society. From the very first page of this story the oddities are apparent. Federal Ethical Suicide Parlors, Nothingheads, Birth control three times a day, seventeen billion people on earth, and a world government are the new norm. Things must have gone completely south for the world to need suicide parlors run by six-foot-tall virgins wearing body stockings and boots with big eyes and white lips and law requiring birth control that numbs the person from the waist down. The law breakers not taking the birth control are called nothingheads, risking ten thousand dollars in fines and ten years in prison just to be able to feel their downstairs. Kurt describes these people as “bombed out of their skulls with the sex madness that came from taking nothing” whereas the others who take the required birth control are seen as ethical, moral, good people. What is most worrisome to me is that things have gotten so bad that somehow there has become a World Government. With all the wars, famine, natural disasters, mass murders, and terrorism that have happened in human history nothing has been so bad or good that the world has decided that one governing power should oversee the entire globe. What brought that along is not clear in the story but one has to wonder what Kurt thought could bring that to be. Throughout the story descriptions of what life is like in an overpopulated world pulls the reader in and keeps them thinking what absurdity is to come next. Kurt tells us that in this reality the people who were lucky enough to be born at the right time will always look like they are twenty-two thanks to the new anti-aging medication. He talks of the government running practically everything and practically everything being automated. In fact, things were so automated that the majority of people didn’t have jobs because even the lowly kitchen jobs were automated and “a tape recording of clashing silverware and the laughter of Negroes and Puerto Ricans” replaced the sounds of actual people working. This would hit hard now-a-days to a person from Tokyo where there are vending machines that can dispense actual meals one would sit down to eat at dinner time with the family. Billy the poet is a mysterious character that is very intelligent and very devious.
He seems like a crazy rapist trying to deflower the hostesses of the ethical suicide parlors without any obvious reason at first. Billy the poet is a nothinghead but he doesn’t seem to fit the bill of a person bombed out of his skull with sex madness. In fact, he comes across as a person who is trying to help the populous rediscover the joy, passion, and enjoyment sex can bring to a world that seems to have lost it. What he is doing sounds like he is doing a service to society but come to find out he is raping these women. Although to us it may seem immoral and wrong, the story tells us that the women he rapes stay with him in a cult like fashion and help him to rape his next victim. This brings along a moral argument that we may see or may not, is it ok to rape a woman to bring her to realize she likes sex? Most would say no but when the victim stays with the rapist on her own free will, does that make the whole situation any better? Billy the poet seems to think he is doing a great service to these women and to the world but he seems to not take any joy in his actions as a rapist in our times usually does. During the time from abducting Nancy to the time he gets her locked away to let the pills wear off he doesn’t seem to treat her as a woman, or even a person. He explains that he is not the reason she feels like she is an object but it’s the birth control. After the pills wear off he deflowered her in the Kennedy Complex and this was all because of a pill J. Edgar Nation made when he tried to bring morality to the monkey house of the Grand Rapids
Zoo.
Relationships and Interdependence in the Works of Kurt Vonnegut While on the surface Kurt Vonnegut's works appear to singularly contain the pessimistic views of an aging, black humorist, his underlying meanings reveal a much more sympathetic and hopeful glimpse of humanity that lends itself to eventual societal improvement. As part of Vonnegut's strategy for enhanced communal welfare, the satirist details in the course of his works potential artificial family groups to connect the masses and alleviate the lonely.
Kurt Vonnegut places his experiences and his views in the text. He begins the book by stating, “All this happened, more or less. The war parts, anyway, are pretty much true...I’ve changed all of the names.” Viewing war as a sen...
"In Slaughterhouse Five, -- Or the Children's Crusade, Vonnegut delivers a complete treatise on the World War II bombing of Dresden. The main character, Billy Pilgrim, is a very young infantry scout* who is captured in the Battle of the Bulge and quartered in a Dresden slaughterhouse where he and other prisoners are employed in the production of a vitamin supplement for pregnant women. During the February 13, 1945, firebombing by Allied aircraft, the prisoners take shelter in an underground meat locker. When they emerge, the city has been levelled and they are forced to dig corpses out of the rubble. The story of Billy Pilgrim is the story of Kurt Vonnegut who was captured and survived the firestorm in which 135,000 German civilians perished, more than the number of deaths in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. Robert Scholes sums up the theme of Slaughterhouse Five in the New York Times Book Review, writing: 'Be kind. Don't hurt. Death is coming for all of us anyway, and it is better to be Lot's wife looking back through salty eyes than the Deity that destroyed those cities of the plain in order to save them.' The reviewer concludes that 'Slaughterhouse Five is an extraordinary success. It is a book we need to read, and to reread.' "The popularity of Slaughterhouse Five is due, in part, to its timeliness; it deals with many issues that were vital to the late sixties: war, ecology, overpopulation, and consumerism. Klinkowitz, writing in Literary Subversions.New American Fiction and the Practice of Criticism, sees larger reasons for the book's success: 'Kurt Vonnegut's fiction of the 1960s is the popular artifact which may be the fairest example of American cultural change. . . . Shunned as distastefully low-brow . . . and insufficiently commercial to suit the exploitative tastes of high-power publishers, Vonnegut's fiction limped along for years on the genuinely democratic basis of family magazine and pulp paperback circulation. Then in the late 1960s, as the culture as a whole exploded, Vonnegut was able to write and publish a novel, Slaughterhouse Five, which so perfectly caught America's transformative mood that its story and structure became best-selling metaphors for the new age. '"Writing in Critique, Wayne D. McGinnis comments that in Slaughterhouse Five, Vonnegut 'avoids framing his story in linear narration, choosing a circular structure.
Kurt Vonnegut’s war experiences had a great impact on his life, which greatly contributes to the readers understanding of the "Barnhouse Effect." His war experiences are reflected quite vividly through his writing of the "Barnhouse Effect." This short story reflects "the human horrors during war, and the de-humanization of modern men and women, and the loss of humane values in a society dedicated to technological progress." (Modern Stories, p. 408)
Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut is a satire on the state of world affairs in the 1960's. Vonnegut made a commentary in this book on the tendency of humans to be warlike, belligerent, and shortsighted. The main character of the book, the narrator, is certainly not a protagonist, although the modern reader craves a hero in every story and the narrator in this one is the most likely candidate. Through the narrator's eyes, Vonnegut created a story of black humor ending in the destruction of the earth.
Kurt Vonnegut’s fictional novel “Cat’s Cradle”, indirectly explores issues that parallels into topics such as religion, scientific/technological advancements, political power and much more. Vonnegut’s novel is narrated by a character named Jonah (John). He, Jonah, sets out to write an anthropological book based off of what key people were doing on the day that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Throughout Vonnegut’s novel it can clearly represents how a writer can become a very destructive person to society. As for this novel, it shows through the uses of parallels that a writer can become a very destructive person to society, these parallels are reflects to real world issues throughout his novel to show this claim, that a writer too can be a destructive person to society.
How should we react to the horrors of war, heartache, and famine? Do we try to solve our problems all at once, or do we sit back and watch things fall apart? Kurt Vonnegut has an interesting idea of what to do, as is shown in his novel, Slaughter House Five. Vonnegut's prescription for dealing with the tragic absurdity of the twentieth century is to simply not deal with it. In his novel, Vonnegut shows that he is more inclined to sit back and watch than to let things affect him.
Oscar Wilde, an acclaimed Irish Poet, novelist, dramatist and critic once aptly commented, “Men become old, but they never become good”. The philosophical aspect of this quote relies on the basis that human beings are inherently malevolent. Through his pessimistic perspective, Wilde clearly captures the ill-disposed mindset of mankind. Moreover, there are various deductive arguments that discredit the optimistic depiction of human nature. One of the prime examples can be found in Kurt Vonnegut’s literature. In Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat's Cradle, through the illustration of his characters, the author symbolizes the four elements of human fallibility.
Vonnegut and Jackson, through the use of well written short stories, have managed to address concerning issues in today’s societies. Through the use of Harrison Bergeron Kurt Vonnegut was able to address the growing issue of equality, this is a very important issue as many people in modern societies view the idea of equality to be incredible. Shirley Jackson through The Lottery addressed the concerning issue of societies blindly following religions and traditions due to superstitions and the unwillingness to change. These dystopian texts demonstrate the inevitable outcome these problems will eventually cause.
Slaughterhouse Five is not a book that should be glanced over and discarded away like a dirty rag. Slaughterhouse Five is a book that should be carefully analyzed and be seen as an inspiration to further improve the well-being of mankind. Vonnegut makes it clear that an easy way to improve mankind is to see war not as a place where legends are born, but rather, an event to be avoided. Intelligent readers and critics alike should recognize Vonnegut’s work and see to it that they make an effort to understand the complexities behind the human condition that lead us to war.
Throughout his career, Kurt Vonnegut has used writing as a tool to convey penetrating messages and ominous warnings about our society. He skillfully combines vivid imagery with a distinctly satirical and anecdotal style to explore complex issues such as religion and war. Two of his most well known, and most gripping, novels that embody this subtle talent are Cat's Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five. Both books represent Vonnegut’s genius for manipulating fiction to reveal glaring, disturbing and occasionally redemptive truths about human nature. On the surface, Cat’s Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five are dramatically different novels, each with its own characters, symbols, and plot. However, a close examination reveals that both contain common themes and ideas. Examining and comparing the two novels and their presentation of different themes provides a unique insight into both the novels and the author – allowing the reader to gain a fuller understanding of Vonnegut’s true meaning.
Friendship is undoubtedly one of the most important elements in the books of Aristotle’s ethical principles. Aristotle takes the idea of friendship to a serious degree. He categorizes them into three groups or types of friendships. This report will attempt to define each type of friendship as well as identify the role of friendship in a society.
Eden Robinson is a Haisla writer who was born at Haisla Nation Kitimaat Reserve on 19th January 1968 (“Eden Robinson” 2007). She has a Haisla father and a Heiltsuk mother and spent both her childhood and her adolescence in the Reserve (“Eden Robinson” 2007). Robinson obtained a bachelor’s degree in Fine Arts at the University of Victoria and also earned a master’s degree in Creative Writing at the University of British Columbia (“Eden Robinson” 2007). Monkey Beach is her first novel and was published in 2000 (“Eden Robinson” 2007).
One of the ways Billy shows his ineffective ways of dealing with death is by using Risa Walker as sexual escape from his daily life. For example he shows himself using Risa Walker for pleasure when he admits, “So, instead, we said, “I love you,”, and let it go at that” (Banks 40). Spending time with Risa is daily escape for Billy. It is the one time of the day where he completely forgets about the bad things that have happened in his life and focusses on Risa. Billy does not really like her but is using her for his sexual pleasure after his wife is dead. It is not like they love each other it is more like they need each other because they are both burdened with stron...
Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Slaughterhouse-Five, uses the biblical allusion of Lot’s wife looking back on the destroyed cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to parallel the story of Billy Pilgrim during the war and his experience after, when he returns to the United States. Although the reference is brief, it has profound implications to the portrayal of America during World War II, especially the bombing of Dresden. Although Lot’s wife’s action dooms her to turn into a pillar of salt, the narrator emphasizes her choice to indicate the importance of being compassionate and having hindsight. Ultimately, Slaughterhouse-Five critiques the American social attitude to disregard the unjust nature of its actions in World War II. Furthermore, Vonnegut’s novel explicates this by elucidating the horrors of war—especially in regard to the massacre of innocence, how it leaves the soldiers stagnant when they return home, and leaves them empty with an American Dream that cannot be fulfilled. In order to combat violence, the novel stresses that one must hold human life to a higher value and be compassionate towards others; America must acknowledge its mistakes so that the soldiers who fought and died for her so that the soldiers may move on.