Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of gun violence
How gun violence effects in america
How gun violence effects in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of gun violence
The 2015 reflective documentary, “Welcome to Leith” brings attention to the gun-trotting White Supremacist, Craig Cobb, and his attempt to assert his dominance and gain total jurisdiction over the city of Leith, North Dakota. Over a period of eight months, Michael Beach Nichols and his crew filmed the final weeks that lead up to infamous fascist influencer’s incarceration. With a whopping population of 24 people, mostly consisting of farmers and their families, Mr. Cobb relocated and purchased his first property in Leith for only five-hundred dollars in May of 2012. At first, his neighbours described him as being a quiet but estranged individual who kept to himself most of the time. Little did the townspeople know, Cobb had much bigger plans. He slowly but surely started to build his empire by accumulating about thirteen separate …show more content…
plots of land. Cobb envisioned turning the ghost town of Leith into a safe-haven for his fellow Neo-Nazis. Eventually, Cobb managed to successfully lure other White Supremacists to Leith, offering them low priced properties and encouraging them to join his “movement”.
By December 2013, Cobb’s determination to create a White Nationalist community grew and his actions became increasingly threatening. Incorporating numerous members of the National Socialist movement, Cobb’s family of Skin-Heads began to thrive. In their savage attempt to force the people of Leith out of their homes, they planted their flags, posted signs encouraging hate crime around town and spray painted neon colour swastikas on the trees. However, it did not take long for the townspeople of Leith to get fed up with Cobb’s avid racism. Refusing to be intimated by his psychotic tendencies, the people fought back. They gathered video evidence of Cobb and his allies patrolling the neighbourhood armed with loaded weapons. In the video, Cobb can be seen verbally abusing and threatening one of his neighbours while motioning towards him with what we later find out to be is a loaded gun. The video also features the aftermath of a Neo-Nazi’s vandalization to a local woman’s car. Three of her tires has been
slashed and “go home” had been spray painted in black along the side of her vehicle. Later, we are shown the man who was presumably responsible for vandalizing the woman’s car, parked out of side of her house. She repeated asks him to leave and reminds him that he is unwelcome but he does not move until she pulls out her phone and begins to film. Those are just a few examples of the harassment the townspeople faced everyday. About a year later, they were eventually able to rise up and the city council attempted to force Cobb out of his properties for lack of running water/sewage systems shortly before he was arrested. In January of 2014, he was tried for seven felony accounts of terrorism. Cobb was later released on four years of probation in April. To sum it all up, the movie focuses on a psychopath’s attempt to invade the spooky little city of Leith while addressing civil-rights issues regarding freedom of speech and illustrating how far is too far.
"Trust in the Lord with all your heart; do not depend on your own understanding. Seek his will in all you do, and he will show you which path to take." Proverbs 3:5-6. In the book, Born Again, Chuck Colson was as deadly to political opponents as a lion is to prey. Colson was largely targeted by the media and dragged through the mud, after a scandal that led to an investigation of Nixon's White House administration. He had become a public scapegoat for the media. Through a long and taxing process, Colson was indicted and put in jail. However, through the straining process, he had found a path to God
What would you do for love? Would you break up a marriage or assassinate an Archduke? In the short story “IND AFF” by Fay Weldon the narrator must make a choice on whether or not to continue her love affair while examining the Princip’s murder of the Archduke Ferdinand and his wife. The story is set in Sarajevo in Bosnia, Yugoslavia where the assassination took place. Through irony, symbolism and setting, Weldon uses the parallel between the narrator and Pincip to show that seemingly inconsequential actions of an individual can have great consequences.
In the novel Eggers created an accurate portrayal of the events of racial profiling and looting; this becomes apparent if one views the documentary by Spike Lee, When the Levees Broke. In the novel, Zeitoun was arrested, racially profiled, and labeled a terrorist and a looter. Dave Eggers tells us that Zeitoun, Todd, Nasser, and Ronnie were arrested at gunpoint and later accused of looting a local Walgreen store and of terrorist activities. They are suspects because Zeitoun and Nasser are Muslims from Syria and Nasser and Todd had large amounts of money in their possession. This confirms the higher authorities’ suspicions of the so-called terrorists looting local shops when in fact they were helping local citizens and animals reach safety.
‘Fire in a canebrake’ is quite a scorcher by Laura Wexler and which focuses on the last mass lynching which occurred in the American Deep South, the one in the heartland of rural Georgia, precisely Walton County, Georgia on 25th July, 1946, less than a year after the Second World War. Wexler narrates the story of the four black sharecroppers who met their end ‘at the hand of person’s unknown’ when an undisclosed number of white men simply shot the blacks to death. The author concentrates on the way the evidence was collected in those eerie post war times and how the FBI was actually involved in the case, but how nothing came of their extensive investigations.
In his book, Blood Done Sign My Name, the author Timothy Tyson tells the story of the highly combustible racial atmosphere in the American South before, during, and after the Jim Crow era. Unlike Margaret Mitchell’s account of the glory and grandeur of the Antebellum South, Tyson exposes the reader to the horrific and brutal reality that the black race experienced on a daily basis. Tyson highlights the double standard that existed during this period in history, arguing that the hypocrisy of the “white” southern judicial system allowed the murder of a young black African-American male at the hands of white racists to go unpunished (Tyson 2004, 244). The hypocrisy and double standard that allowed whites to bring harm to blacks without fear of any repercussions had existed for years before the murder Tyson wrote about occurred in May of 1970 (Tyson 2004, 1).
The police would frequently aggravate the Roughnecks to see if they can get a reaction from them. They would falsely accuse the Roughnecks of doing something illegal, like loitering, and threaten to arrest them. If the Roughnecks were around where something illegal took place, the police would arrest
In one incident when a white teenager Deryl Dedman ran over his truck over Black guy James Craig Anderson by passing a racial slur, “ I ran that nigger over” (Rankine 94)(10). This shows the white’s extra ordinary powers to oppress the black community and the failure of legal system
On August 28, 1955, fourteen year old Emmett Till was beaten, tortured and shot. Then with barbed wire wrapped around his neck and tied to a large fan, his body was discarded into the Tallahatchi River. What was young Emmett’s offense that brought on this heinous reaction of two grown white men? When he went into a store to buy some bubblegum he allegedly whistled at a white female store clerk, who happened to be the store owner’s wife. That is the story of the end of Emmett Till’s life. Lynchings, beatings and cross-burning had been happening in the United States for years. But it was not until this young boy suffered an appalling murder in Mississippi that the eyes of a nation were irrevocably opened to the ongoing horrors of racism in the South. It sparked the beginning of a flourish of both national and international media coverage of the Civil Rights violations in America.
The film Welcome to Leith was directed by Michael Beach Nichols and Christopher K. Walker. This film was based on a small town in North Dakota where everyone knew everyone. It was less of a town and more of a family, until Craig Cobb moved in. Craig Cobb was a white supremacists and neo-Nazi. His plan was to take over the town and make it his own. I believe everyone should be treated the same, and it shouldn’t matter what they believe or how they look. This film also shows how police can and should do more about protecting citizens.
Four black sharecroppers (Roger Malcom, Dorothy Malcom, George Dorsey and Mae Murray Dorsey) are brutally murdered by a group of white people. The murders attracted national attention, but the community was not willing to get involved. The community was not fazed by these brutal murders but, by the fact that this incident got national attention. They were even more astounded that the rest of the nation even cared. In this book Laura Wexler shows just how deep racism goes. After reading the book I discovered that Fire in a Canebrake has three major themes involving racism. The first is that racism obstructs progression. The second is history repeats itself. The last theme is that racism can obscure the truth. This lynching, in particular, marks a turning point in the history of race relations and the governments’ involvement in civil rights. In the end this case still remains unsolved. No concept of the
In her Fire in a Canebrake, Laura Wexler describes an important event in mid-twentieth century American race relations, long ago relegated to the closet of American consciousness. In so doing, Wexler not only skillfully describes the event—the Moore’s Ford lynching of 1946—but incorporates it into our understanding of the present world and past by retaining the complexities of doubt and deception that surrounded the event when it occurred, and which still confound it in historical records. By skillfully navigating these currents of deceit, too, Wexler is not only able to portray them to the reader in full form, but also historicize this muddled record in the context of certain larger historical truths. In this fashion, and by refusing to cede to a desire for closure by drawing easy but inherently flawed conclusions regarding the individuals directly responsible for the 1946 lynching, Wexler demonstrates that she is more interested in a larger historical picture than the single event to which she dedicates her text. And, in so doing, she rebukes the doubts of those who question the importance of “bringing up” the lynching, lending powerful motivation and purpose to her writing that sustains her narrative, and the audience’s attention to it.
“Who was the most racist in that situation? Was it the white man who was too terrified to confront his black neighbors on their rudeness? Was it the black folks who abandoned their mattress on their curb? … Or was it all of us, black and white, passively revealing that, despite our surface friendliness, we didn’t really care about one another?” He never blames the black neighbors for their disregard of the mattress because their black, but sounds aware of the stereotyping and how he comes off addressing it. He also knows how much he stands out in the community as a minority, wondering what the cops would say to him, “ ‘Buddy,’ the cops would say. ‘You don’t fit the profile of the neighborhood.” Despite his pride in his actions of disposing of the mattress, the mistreatment by his black neighbors comes off as an unfortunate, but expected, consequence, “I knew the entire block would shun me. I felt pale and lost, like an American explorer in the
The clan markings and tattoos these men had tells me that they belong to a “gang” or group dedicated to racial hatred. I guarantee you that these men as children had no idea what racism was until someone taught it to them, from there it branched off into their individual view of who is superior and who is not.
In the first scene when Cameron is introduced, two white cops get a call about a stolen car. The openly racist cop, Officer Ryan, pulls over Cameron and Christine’s Lincoln Navigator, although it is obvious that their Navigator is not the stolen vehicle. The cop thinks he sees the couple participating in a sexual act while driving. When he approaches the car to ask for registration and license, Cameron and Christine laugh and find the whole situation humorous. Officer Ryan then asks Cameron to step out, and although Cameron obeys, he acts confused. He is obviously not drunk or wanting trouble (in the movie it even states that he is a Buddhist), and he declares that he lives only a block away. When his wife comes out of the car protesting the absurdity of the stop, the officer tells both of them to put their hands on the car so he can check for weapons. The cop then humiliates Christine by feeling her up between her thighs while Cameron is forced to stand by and watch. In this scene, Cameron does not protest but unbelievingly stares at what is happening to his wife. He is in a vulnerable situation because if he objects, he and his wife could be arrested and his reputation ruined. When the police ask Cameron what he should do with what they did in the car he slowly says, “Look, we’re sorry and we’d appreciate it if you’d let us go with a warning, please.
The theme of Hugh Garner's 'The Sound of Hollyhocks'; concerns one of Canada's most serious social problems. The theme suggests how condescension and discrimination can have devastating effects on the people around us. The story is set in Pinehills Clinic where alcoholics and psychotics are placed to recover. Wilf Armstrong, an alcoholic at the clinic, ends up with 'Rock Hudson';, who is a psychotic at the hospital, as his roommate. 'Rock Hudson'; was the nickname given to William Cornish Ranson by some of the other alcoholics. Rock was forced into mental illness by his mother because his wife, Sarah, was from a different social class. Rock comes from a rich family and he met Sarah at one of his father's branch of banks. They got married secretly because Rock knew that his mother would object such a marriage since Sarah came from a poorer and less prestigious background. The first meeting between Sarah and Rock's mother proved to be a disaster. Due to Rock's mother's disapproval of Sarah, Sarah and Rock's marriage starts to fall apart. One thing leads to another, and Sarah and Rock's marriage ends with Sarah's abrupt death. This pushes Rock into his present state of hearing flowers talk to him. This is a great example of how social problems such as condescension and discrimination can have devastating effects on those around us. If Rock's mother had not shown such hostility towards Sarah and Rock, they wouldn't have grown apart and Sarah would not have died and Rock would not have gone crazy. So Rock's mother, who originally just wanted the best for his son, becomes the person that pushes Rock into his mental illness, which ultimately lead to his death. Things like this happen every day in Canada and around the world. Awhile ago, several 'skinheads'; were tried for beating a Sikh man to death due to racial and religious differences.