Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of the Protestant Reformation
Max weber on society
Effect of the Protestant Reformation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of the Protestant Reformation
According to Weber, rationalization is a heritage of the Protestant ethic. This mindset means that the concern for salvation is articulated in everyday life in Protestant societies in the form of the rational pursuit of economic gains. However, this evolved into something that did not work well with traditional notions of salvation, so it became more secular in its nature. This meant that in modern day terms, rationalization is the imposition of more nuanced or vaunted emotions, traditions, behaviors and so on with rational ones. For example, someone who foregoes an art degree even if they are an artistic genius so they can major in accounting is engaging in rationalization.
2. Mutual orientation (Edwards) – Edwards’ concept of mutual orientation
Rationalization is an extreme form of pragmatism. Darcy interestingly observes that what Turkle describes in her book is really an extension of Weber’s theory in terms of the rationalization of personal relationships. That is, rationalization has finally begun to extend beyond actions in the individual and now exists between people. Rationalization is a kind of extreme way of looking at personal choices in terms of making them as efficient as possible. Within the Protestant ethic outlined by Weber, rationalization is in some way a form of self-abnegation and punishment, because it so often involves denying natural impulses in favor of what is
Mutual orientation is something of a process of convenience, and it reflects synergies at many different levels. Mutual orientation means that most technology stories are at their core the same story. It means that most technological endeavors have involved trying to outsource or rationalize different tasks.
More holistically, mutual orientation means that most people have similar goals or desires in interactions with technology. It means that most people want to engage in interactions that make them feel better. Mutual orientation means that whether a corporation, the government, or the military is funding a particular technological endeavor, the same dynamics apply on every level.
Whether on the meso-scale, the macro-scale, or micro-scale, mutual orientation reveals the same story. On the meso level, humans’ desire for interpersonal relationship reveals a desire to achieve permanence in these relationships without the unknowability and unpredictable nature of humans. The macro shows the large shift towards robotic or screen-based relationships as a function of corporate desires to monetize this impulse. Finally, the micro level shows that it is just one technology story in a history of
Rational Choice Theory - Rational choice theory, as defined by the textbook, is "A perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of conscious choice. Rational choice theory predicts that individuals will choose to commit crime when the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs of disobeying the law" (Schmalleger 76). It is an economic principle that assumes that individuals always make prudent and logical decisions that provide them with the greatest benefits or satisfaction and that are in their highest self-interest. It should also be noted that most mainstream economic assumptions and theories are based on rational choice theory. According to the lawdictionary.org, rational choice theory "attempts to explain social phenomenon in terms of how self-interested individuals make choices under the influence of their preferences. All parties try to maximize their advantage, and to minimize their disadvantages" (lawdictionary.org). An example of rational choice theory would be a person stealing money from a company that they work for, with the intent of having the benefit of getting rich at no cost. The person believes that he or she will not get caught, thus not having to pay any costs, making it a rational decision or choice in their
Rationality is this idea by Weber that it is potentially what created capitalism. Formal rationality is the set of pre-determined criteria that we use to make decisions and conduct activities. He basically says that as humans, we set goals for ourselves and we take whatever steps necessary to reach those goals. These steps though, have to be rational i.e. they are based off of our past experiences, logic or even science. Weber best describes this through the Protestant Ethic, in which he speaks of traditional capitalism, and rational capitalism.
rational grounds, as in matters of passion, desired out come and choice. James claims that belief
In the world today, people are constantly surrounded by technology. At any given moment, we can connect to others around the world through our phones, computers, tablets, and even our watches. With so many connections to the outside world, one would think we have gained more insight into having better relationships with the people that matter the most. Despite these connections, people are more distant to one another than ever. In the article, “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk," author Sherry Turkle details her findings on how people have stopped having real conversations and argues the loss of empathy and solitude are due to today’s technology. Turkle details compelling discoveries on how technology has changed relationships in “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk,” and her credibility is apparent through years of research and the persuasive evidence that supports her claims.
Sherry Turkle’s article in The New York Times “The Flight From Conversation”, she disputes that we need to put down the technology and rehabilitate our ability to converse with other human beings because we are replacing deep relationships with actual people for casual encounters on technology. Turkle tries to convince young and middle age individuals who are so enthralled by the technology that they are losing the ability to communicate in a public setting. Sherry Turkle unsuccessfully persuades her audience to put down the technology and engage with others in public through her strong logos appeal that overpowers her weak logos and doesn’t reliably represent herself and her research.
... and that this split is destructive. This separation forces us to act with only one aspect of ourselves at a time. The rational portion is what we act upon if we want to be taken seriously since using emotions or being emotional is equivalent to being out of control and is therefore bad (in today’s heterosexual and patriarchal society). This separation can be seen in our current interpretations of desire as nonrational, as erotic and therefore out of control. True desire however involves reason and emotion, both to determine what we want, reason to help decipher how to attain it and emotion to give us the drive to work towards it. Reason and emotion are inseparable and when we try to separate them is when we end up fragmenting ourselves.
It is the 18th century and the Enlightenment, which is also known as the Age of Reason in Europe and America, and humankind faces an intellectual, philosophical and social movement that is focused on science and reason. Religion, politics and economics are changing focus. Wars are being fought within, as opposed to between countries. This time prior to the French Revolution finds monarchies being executed in France and England. The rising merchant class is demanding social and political power held previously by the nobility. There are major social changes, as inherited positions are less secure. People no longer believed that every event that occurred was a result of God’s intervention. There is a new way of thinking about religion, natural rights as well as natural laws. There is an attitude that God is the creator of a universe that functions without intervention. Deism believed in a hereafter, but also believed we should focus on this life’s achievements and joy, rather than look at a life in the hereafter. The concept of humanitarianism; helping those less fortunate, is a new concept during this time since prior to that the religious belief was that if someone experienced misfortune, it was God’s will and punishment. The Enlightenment focused on man, rather than God and the church. Where prior to the 1700s man lived in an agricultural society during the feudal period, the Enlightenment witnessed the development of a more cosmopolitan society, with people living in groups that were interdependent on each other. It opened the gateway to the Industrial Revolution. The Enlightenment inspired the world’s first democracy, in the United States of America. The new approach in reasoning and problem solving is what makes ...
He states in his other article, “Fighting Back Against Anti-Intellectualism”, that we should realize that reason alone will not save humanity. Niose states, “ Rational thinking can be applied to any situation --- moral or immortal --- and this is why values are also critical in combating anti-intellectualism and promoting progressive, human-centered public policy… ,the best modern values are rooted not in ancient texts, but in human experience, accumulated knowledge, and natural human altruistic inclinations.” He claims that, if we take it upon ourselves to set our own values to make more rational decision based on our own experience, knowledge, and noble individual view on situation we will be less likely to fall into the trend of
The novel, Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other (2011) written by Sherry Turkle, presents many controversial views, and demonstrating numerous examples of how technology is replacing complex pieces and relationships in our life. The book is slightly divided into two parts with the first focused on social robots and their relationships with people. The second half is much different, focusing on the online world and it’s presence in society. Overall, Turkle makes many personally agreeable and disagreeable points in the book that bring it together as a whole.
Rational choice theory in Criminal Justice focuses on deterrence and how individuals are influenced by some type of factor that makes them engage in crime. This adds to conversation that criminologists started in the 1700’s because they were all about deterring criminals. They wanted the crime to fit the punishment which would deter other criminals from committing that same crime. Rational Choice Theory and Classical criminologists also believed that people committed crimes because they wanted to achieve their desired goals whether it would be for money or their sexual desires. This was based off of free will where people decided if they were going to commit a crime and what the consequences would be if they committed that crime.
What is Rational Choice? Rational choice theory is when violating behavior occurs when the offender commits crimes as a personal factor or situational factor. A personal factor is someone getting revenge on someone or just to steal money. A situational factor is where it targets the victim’s vulnerability. For a
When applying the Rational Theory approach to passionate crimes it would be said that the person has a choice to act on their emotions. If the crime was committed then that means they chose not to repress their passion.
...restricting ones beliefs and refusing rational ideas, religion cripples a person’s ability to reason and limits their minds strength. It is science and rationalizing that leads to a growth in intellect and with that comes greater opportunity for power and success. Although, through science some ideas are proven false, only science gives reliable answers.
...orms in the relationship because both parties are working together toward mutual goal of satisfaction (Siguaw et al., 1998).
They accept sense experience is relative and evolving. These philosophers guarantee that you require motivation to deal with what is appearance from reality and they deny that sense experience is the main wellspring of information about reality. Rationalistic scholars accept that thoughts like the laws of rationale, the idea of equity and the thought of God are as of now contained profound inside of the psyche and just should be conveyed to the level of our mindfulness. With this way of thinking we see weaknesses and strengths of Rationalism. The weakness is if we rely only on a reason and ignore sense experience we will start questioning everything ‘is it truly real or just illusion?’ it would cause side effect in our existence. It will effect negatively our mind and the way our thinking. The strength side in my opinion that it helps to distinguish past tangible experience from coherent