Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Income and wealth inequality sociology
Uneven distribution of wealth
Uneven distribution of wealth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
People often confuse the two synonymous terms of being rich and being wealthy, as both involve having an abundance of money. The main difference between the two is knowledge–wealthy people know how to make money, while rich people only have money. When one analyzes and dissects the two terms, it is easily determined that rich people are solely driven by money and wealthy people are fueled by their ambition, passion, purpose, and dreams. In F. Scott Fitzgerald's short stories, Fitzgerald evaluates the perception of wealth and what is truly meant by the term through the development of his characters.
In Fitzgerald’s “The Rich Boy,” a pompous young man, Anson Hunter, strives to search for something that will be of true value to him. Hunter’s
…show more content…
father wants his sons to “grow up into right-living and successful men” (Fitzgerald 5). Due to his narrow and privileged upbringing, Hunter becomes self-absorbed and egotistical. Moreover, he believes that everything will be served to him on a silver platter as, “he disdained to struggle with other boys for precedence – he expected it to be given him freely” (Fitzgerald 6). Not only does he overlook the money he has, but also he neglects Paula Legendre, his fiancé. Hunter feels predominant in his relationship with Paula and thus disgraces himself by getting drunk and spoiling an evening with her. He does not value his relationship with her until it is too late, and he loses the intangible wealth that is expected from a spouse–marriage and children. Hunter’s personality and character is rooted in his dark richness, and it is “gross, humorous, [and] reckless of everything but pleasure” (Fitzgerald 13). Hunter is unable to find wealth, as seen in his failed attempts of finding true love. As a child, he is consumed by the concept of being rich and it eats his soul everyday so that he is incapable of obtaining wealth. The character development of Anson Hunter reveals that richness can preoccupy wealth. Similar to Hunter, the Washington family in Fitzgerald’s, “The Diamond as Big as the Ritz” acquires a large fortune through their secret land of diamonds.
Percy Washington reveals that his father has “a diamond as big as the Ritz-Carlton Hotel” (Fitzgerald 2). The diamond manipulates the family and brainwashes their values. Deranged acts occur in the household as Braddock Washington captures and kills those who threaten the anonymity and seclusion of their private paradise. Moreover, Percy’s grandfather lies to the enslaved men who digs for him, telling them that the stones were rhinestones and that the South had won the Civil War. The enslaved men never find out about the abolishment of slavery and thus continues to work for the family. Braddock Washington personifies excess personifies excess through his attachment to his property and his inability to cash in on his greatest asset, the biggest diamond in the world. The irony lies in the fact that if he made this known, it would devalue this and every other diamond. Braddock attempts to bribe God before his death, “God had His price, of course. God was made in man’s image, so it had been said: He must have His price” (Fitzgerald 23). Wealth is usually accommodated by happiness, relaxation, and fulfillment. Although the Washingtons surround themselves with opulence and luxury, there is no true wealth and value in the Washington household as seen in the character development of Braddock Washington and his
family. Fitzgerald’s “The Offshore Pirate” differs slightly from the two previous short stories, but still has a character chasing wealth. The story begins with the young aristocrat, Ardita, on a yacht anchored close to the shore. Ardita is defiant, and her rebellion attributes teenage angst, independence, and a sense of entitlement. She argues with her exasperated uncle, as she refuses to leave the yacht to meet with the arranged man, and she is soon left alone as her uncle goes ashore. Shortly after, Ardita and the crew are unexpectedly taken over by pirates, led by Curtis Carlyle. She is amazed by the leader’s confidence, “a young man with a scornful mouth” (Fitzgerald 7), and he offers to spare her provided she keep quiet for the next forty-eight hours. Ardita is wooed by the pirate stories of Carlyle, specifically his plans to be a rajah, and their friendship is sparked into a love and romance. She is determined to travel with the pirates, saying “I’m all for you. I’d really like to see you make a get-away” (Fitzgerald 17). Ardita soon finds out that Curtis Carlyle is not who he portrays to be, but rather he is Toby Moreland, the man her uncle attempts to set her up with. She is content when these are revealed as fantasies because she is pleased that Toby Moreland is in reality a rich man, both in money and in imagination. Ardita, who is at first spoiled and greedy, finds wealth through her love for Moreland, which creates purpose for her life as well as financial status and a healthy mind and spirit. In James Baldwin’s “The Creative Process,” he states that it is an artist’s job to confront and “to correct the delusions to which we fall prey in our attempts to avoid this knowledge” (Baldwin 1). In the short stories of Fitzgerald, there is a distortion between being wealthy and being rich. People automatically assume that if they are rich then they are wealthy as well. However, Fitzgerald negates this common notion through “The Rich Boy,” “The Diamond as Big as the Ritz,” and “The Offshore Pirate.” Fitzgerald’s short story characters reveal an underlying truth: True wealth is obtained through experience, knowledge, fortitude, and resilience.
In this day and age, money is a very important asset to have. One needs to have at least enough to live on, though great amounts are preferable. In The Great Gatsby, by Thomas F. Fitzgerald, having a large amount of money is not enough. It is also the way you acquire the money that matters. Gatsby and Tom both have a lot of money yet Daisey picks one over the other, not because of the difference in the amount they have, but because of the manner in which it is attained.
Through his vivid depiction of the valley of the ashes in the acclaimed novel The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald unveils the truth about 1920s America: economic prosperity did not guarantee happiness and resulted in depreciating conditions for those that were not able to connive their way to the top.
Novelists such as Willa Cather and F. Scott Fitzgerald used themes of desire of wealth as a fundamental element to motivate their characters. In their novels, the theme is reflected by the rich Americans who primal desire is to obtain more and more wealth. These characters are so infatuated with and blinded by money that they no longer regard the more noble qualities of life. In each of their works, these authors present intricate, self-conscious characters that desire wealth in order to attain their dreams. In reality, wealth cannot buy people, ideas or even time.
In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s, The Great Gatsby, Gatsby’s obsessive pursuit of goals suggest that Fitzgerald believe that obsessiveness and constant desires often lead to a wrong psychological impact, destructive of one’s traditions, morals, and would have an unplanned end of the lesson or life.
During the time in our country's history called the roaring twenties, society had a new obsession, money. Just shortly after the great depression, people's focus now fell on wealth and success in the economic realm. Many Americans would stop at nothing to become rich and money was the new factor in separation of classes within society. Wealth was a direct reflection of how successful a person really was and now became what many people strived to be, to be rich. Wealth became the new stable in the "American dream" that people yearned and chased after all their lives. In the novel entitled the great Gatsby, the ideals of the so called American dream became skewed, as a result of the greediness and desires of the main characters to become rich and wealthy. These character placed throughout the novel emphasize the true value money has on a persons place in society making wealth a state of mind.
Despite their numerous connections, there is great conflict between the different economic classes in The Great Gatsby, those being old money, new money, and the scarcely discussed, no money. Separated by the lake, West Egg and East Egg never cease to oppose one another. Fitzgerald shows the effect excessive capital has on people, emphasizing that money is power. Since Tom Buchanan comes from old money, his family fortune has simply been passed onto him; he doesn’t have to work to achieve his social status. Conversely, Jay Gatsby is required to put in the hard work and go to the extremes to get where he is. Tom Buchanan can easily be compared to the well-known Paris Hilton. What great successes is she truly known for? Solely being related to the founder of Hilton Hotels, she has never truly had to make a name for herself. When it comes to Gatsby, if one is capable of overlooking his illegal means of doing so, he is forced to work for his fortune. Steve Jobs, in comparison, also worked for his money, having originally begun his billion dollar company in his garage.
Fitzgerald and O’Connor both incorporate a motif of greed in their works. For example, Fitzgerald conveys the greedy nature of wealthy people in his novel when Nick Carraway states, "[T]o-morrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther" (Fitzgerald 180; ch. 9). With this quote, Fitzgerald exposes that the people who have gained unimaginable amounts wealth and material possessions are never satisfied and continue to want more. Fitzgerald is able to spark an idea in the minds of his audience that happiness is not gained through wealth nor owning material goods. O’Connor takes a different approach to show her disapproval of greed by giving an example of the immoral and corrupt methods people try to satisfy their greedy desires. She writes, "He had always wanted an automobile but he had never been able to afford one before" (O’Connor 1042). Due to Mr. Shiftl...
The Great Gatsby “The Great Gatsby”, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, depicts the vast social difference between the old aristocrats, the new self-made rich and the poor. He vividly interprets the social stratification during the roaring twenties as each group has their own problems to deal with. Old Money, who have fortunes dating from the 19th century, have built up powerful and influential social connections, and tend to hide their wealth and superiority behind a veneer of civility. The New Money made their fortunes in the 1920s boom and therefore have no social connections and tend to overcompensate for this lack with lavish displays of wealth. As usual, the No Money gets overlooked by the struggle at the top, leaving them forgotten or ignored.
Hugh Hefner once said, “I looked back on the roaring Twenties, with its jazz, 'Great Gatsby' and the pre-Code films as a party I had somehow managed to miss.” The parties of the Roaring Twenties were used to symbolize wealth and power in a society that was focused more on materialism and gossip than the important things in life, like family, security, and friends. The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, portrays the characters of Tom and Daisy Buchanan as the epitome of the era. The reader sees these characters acting selfishly and trying to meddle with others’ lives. On the other hand, Nick Carraway, the narrator, acts more to help others and act honestly. Initially the reader sees Carraway’s views towards Jay Gatsby as negative as Gatsby’s actions are perceived as being like the Buchanan’s. As the novel moves forward, the reader notices a change in Carraway’s attitude towards Gatsby. Carraway sees Gatsby for whom he truly is, and that is a loving person who only became rich to win Daisy’s heart. But in this the reader also sees how corrupt and hurtful Gatsby’s actions were to the love of his life. Gatsby’s relationship with Daisy reveals that just as Gatsby’s dream of wooing Daisy is corrupted by illegalities and dishonesty, the “American Dream” of friendship and individualism has disintegrated into the simple pursuit of wealth, power, and pleasure.
Benjamin Franklin once said “Money has never made man happy, nor will it. There is nothing in its nature to produce happiness." This is arguably one of the most cliché quotes of all time. If money cannot provide happiness, then what exactly can it do? The characters of Jay Gatsby and Tom Buchanan open a door to a world in which money was the sole motivation for their success and the only reason for their power. When the reader uses a Marxist critical lens during chapter four of F. Scott 's Fitzgerald 's The Great Gatsby, the social hierarchy reveals how Jay Gatsby and Tom Buchanan utilize the importance of money and social power to manipulate others in their lives.
The thought of having an immense sum of money or wealth brings certain people to believe that money can buy almost anything, even happiness, however in reality, it will only lead to loss and false hope. In the novel, The Great Gatsby, the author, F. Scott Fitzgerald, writes a story about a man named Gatsby who is a victim of this so-called false hope and loss. Throughout the novel, Fitzgerald clearly demonstrates and elaborates on the relationship between having money, wealth, and one's ethics or integrity by acknowledging the idea that the amount of money or wealth one has attained does affect the relationship between one's wealth and one's ethics whether or not in a pleasant manner. Although money and wealth may not be able to buy a person happiness, it surely can buy a person's mind and action, given that a wealthy person has a great deal of power. Fitzgerald analyzes the notion that even though many people dream of being both rich and ethical, it is not possible, and therefore, being poor and ethical is much better than trying to be rich and ethical.
Three works Cited Materialism started to become a main theme of literature in the modernist era. During this time the economy was good causing jazz to be popular, bootlegging common, and an affair meaning nothing (Gevaert). This negative view of money and the gross materialism in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby serves to be a modern theme in the novel. Throughout the novel, the rich possess a sense of carelessness and believe that money yields happiness.
Ex-President Jimmy Carter knows both the power and the limitations of money. He is also aware that the acquisition of money or material wealth is not a worthwhile goal. This was made clear in his speech to the American people when he stated: "Our great cities and our mighty buildings will avail us not if we lack spiritual strength to subdue mere objects to the higher purposes of humanity" (Harnsberger 14). In F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel, The Great Gatsby, the author clearly illustrates that Jay Gatsby does not understand the limitations of the power of money. Gatsby believes that money can recreate the past, buy him happiness, and allow him to climb the social ladder in the prominent East Egg.
“Money is the root of all evil”(Levit). Man and his love of money has destroyed lives since the beginning of time. Men have fought in wars over money, given up family relationships for money and done things they would have never thought that they would be capable of doing because of money. In the movie, based on F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, the author demonstrates how the love and worship of money and all of the trappings that come with it can destroy lives. In the novel Jay Gatsby has lavish parties, wears expensive gaudy clothes, drives fancy cars and tries to show his former love how important and wealthy he has become. He believes a lie, that by achieving the status that most Americans, in th...
Throughout the novel, Fitzgerald portrays a society full of people who have corrupted the true meaning of the American Dream. Fitzgerald portrays the ultimate failure of the American Dream through individuals who believed that wealth is everything. His novel suggests that wealth and materialistic gain are all that concerns people. Some people are born into wealth and others have to work their way through life to gain it. This novel portraits an entire nation of people who are willing to throw everything away just to attempt to achieve an unattainable dream.