Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of religion in politics
Interaction between religion and the state
Interaction between religion and the state
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of religion in politics
Weaknesses that Indonesian currently doesn’t lie in the system and the law that already exist. Indonesia weakness lies in the mindset of each population. Star from the representatives. Those who have been elected by the people are not really striving to escort these goods system. There is only a representative of the people who fought for the interests of the party and personal gain alone. Political costs are very high that only borne by making them have to replace the personal costs incurred. Even worse, they are trying to find loopholes to profit from their position.
The executives, the multi-party system adopted by Indonesia has a distinct advantage. Many of the views and interests of people who can be accommodate. However, there are disadvantages
…show more content…
It happens because they become part of a vicious circle in the field of corruption. Police, prosecutors, lawyers and judges can no longer be trusted. Because it is common knowledge that illegal payments become widespread among them.
Society can’t be exempt from this system. It is the people who elect the representatives of the people, society is selecting executives and society is getting used extortion case. Election representatives we have just passed to witness how stupid the mindset of our society. They do not think for the common good but only personal well-being. As a result of political money to be one of the most interesting ways prospective to gains the victory.
Social doctrine of the church is the answer to the problems that exist in Indonesia. The application of the law firm is one of the answers. But the real answer is in how this nation set the mindset of every society. Attention to the common welfare must be improved and the social doctrine of the church offers a solution. Church prompting an intense cooperation between religious communities and state agencies. To change all the chaos the government must be willing to support religious institutions to educate people that live social values that can change their
…show more content…
Joint studies also need to be done to find a better solution to all existing problems. The need for a massive movement of this. People need to be made aware of the benefits and prosperity we can achieve together. This is continually reinforced by the church. One attempt to create a just and prosperous world.
Keep in mind that all these teachings not yet fully become a reality. Many people and officials of the Catholic Church which still live in the social doctrine of the church and apply in their daily live. The social doctrine of the church remains very necessary as a direction where we as humans will go step. Maybe someday, social doctrine of the church can be a real voice in our lives together.
At this time, in the midst of change and modernization, "lies the reality of injustice that remained unchanged. In Indonesia there is still a very great poverty. Hundreds of millions of people have not access to natural resources. Exploitation has destroyed the environment resources are very valuable and thus damaging the environment also spiritual and material of our society. All these are interrelated, and together disturb on survival crisis. Currently as far as we have observed, the religions in Indonesia as sterile from politics. Many people who are faithful and devout refused to enter into the realm of politics, because for them, politics is dirty and
In Charles Colson and Nancy Pearcy's essay, "Worldviews in Conflict," the authors evaluate the shifting cultural context of today's society and how Christianity fits into this situation. The essay compares the differing views between Christianity and today's worldview, and informs the reader on how to engage in today's culture. The "Worldviews in Conflict" is a reliable source because its authors, audience, publication, and purpose make it credible.
Throughout my ongoing investigation of the interactions between religious values and social behavior, I have become thoroughly intrigued with the role of the institutional church in the realm of social commentary and criticism, as well as political activism. That there is a long standing concept within the church tradition relating to my curiosity is not terribly surprising after just an overview of the language that sociology theory has applied to religious bodies. The role of the church in relation to society is divided into two basic categories of action- that of the “priest,” and that of the “prophet.” (Download a PDF file of a pamphlet eslpaining the terminolgoy of "Priest & Prophet.") The former describes the conserving, nurturing actions of the church towards broader social structures, the latter, criticism and the call to move away from corruption towards righteousness. When acting as prophet in the most extreme sense, the church is considered to be in a time of, what is called, status confessionis - acknowledging a state of social injustice so abhorrent that the church must actively interject its influence into even the secular sphere and demand repentance and reform. Nazism and apartheid in South Africa are the two most often cited examples of church bodies acting in status confessionis (Schuurman 100).
Politics: it is what keeps the world running. With the world’s modern politics, Catholics, as Catholics, have a special obligation of practicing political responsibility, The CCC, Catechism of the Catholic Church, says “Catholics have a moral obligation to promote the common good through the exercise of their voting privileges” (CCC 2240) this includes having a well formed conscience, intricate knowledge of the non-negotiable issues as taught by the Church, and knowledge of what it means to participate fully in the political world.
The question of moral validity has plagued societies for millennia. Unsurprisingly, this question afflicted Indonesia between 1965 and 1966. In the early days of October 1965, a group of conspirators took and killed six generals. The disagreement of whom caused this coup caused the killing of more than 80,000 (1,000,000 in some areas) people. This caused a social change from aristocrats to an Indonesian business class. For other peoples around the world, the view of this genocide was a victory over communism. While these killings were clearly morally deplorable, the result was an improved and restructured government; a victory for capitalism at the height of the Cold War.
...ticipate in activities that give a fillip to their urge to live and be part of a compassionate living mode. Soup kitchens, blood donation camps, voluntary services in hospices and many more such activities can be co-ordinated through students and other youngsters on a larger and wider level and with global linkage and understanding. Such an embodiment, on a global level will, without doubt drive us, peoples of the world to unite as one, setting aside our differences, be it in religion, politics, or other worldly conflicts, to master our divine purpose, the betterment of humanity and nature. The three Abrahamic faiths, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, among other religions, exemplify the qualities of compassion and love clearly reflecting these ideas in their scriptures and teachings can substantially aid this process and will ultimately lead to worldwide peace.
The role of religion in politics is a topic that has long been argued, and has contributed to the start of wars, schisms (both political and religious), and other forms of inter and intra-state conflict. This topic, as a result of its checkered past, has become quite controversial, with many different viewpoints. One argument, put forth by many people throughout history, is that religion and the government should remain separate to avoid any conflicting interests. This view also typically suggests that there is one, or several, large and organized religions like the Roman Catholic Church, which would be able to use their “divine” authority to sway the politics of a given state by promising or threatening some form of godly approval or disapproval. By leveraging their divine power, individual figures within a religion, as well as the religion as a whole, could gain secular power for themselves, or over others. A second view, which was developed by many theologians through history, suggests that that without religion there would be a general lack of morality in the people and leaders of a given state, which would give way to poor political decisions that would not be in the interest of the people and perhaps even God (or the gods). This argument, however, does not address the fact that morality can exist without religion. In sociology, it is commonly accepted that social norms, which include morality, can result from any number of things. Religion, laws, or the basic desire of survival can all create these norms, so it suffices to say that as a society, our morals reflect our desire to live in relative peace through the creation of laws that serve to help us to survive. The argument of whether or not religion and politics should mix...
some, such as Karl max saw that religion is a way strong of a tool that impairs social evaluation. Which resulted in ethnic and religious cleansing and furthermore proved to be the wrong approach to defining the role that religion plays in societies behaviors. I for one, think that religion is an indispensable and integral part of human sociology; furthermore, I believe understanding this relationship would lead to social development.
Certain statements made by Pope John Paul II in his commentary on the lasting significance of the papal encyclical “Rerum Novarum,” resonate in a highly spiritual plane, others a highly earthly one, and others in both at once. I would posit that this integrated place is of utmost significance to a sound doctrine of social justice in society, with which both documents are highly concerned. The current pope most clearly states the intertwining of the spiritual and physical needs of the human being when he says that “the Church's social teaching is itself a valid instrument of evangelization ” and “reveals man to himself” (John Paul II, 78). Like Pope John Paul II, I understand the social doctrine of the Church as more than an opportunity to show others how good God is and how much they need the spiritual salvation that comes from this same God's goodness. I believe in God's goodness, God is content to care for God's created and beloved children through fostering the practice of justice and peace as integral threads in the tapestry of all ...
An understanding of the Christian belief of peace is gained through the importance of the life of Jesus Christ in the beliefs of adherents. Peace is believed to be at the heart of Jesus' life and ministry and accordingly it is a foundational element of the Christian communities that seek to follow him. In order for Christians to exper...
One of the central developments was to establish what principles is shared by people of different faiths, as Christianity is not completely universal nor necessarily natural in all of its principles set forth. Grotius took part in initiating this development as he denounced the notion of universal Christianity, and suggested a better degree of validity would be possible under a less biased set of moral principle (Coleman, pg. 67). This development was found to be what is most “reasonable” for mankind by modern theorists such as John Finnis, yet branching from the notions set forth by prior theorists. Finnis’ theory operates in the absence of a divine figure, yet still holds a universal standard of what is “good.” This reasonable notion is further evaluated as moral principles are naturally embedded into human beings, and a particular system such as religion is not necessary to reflect such (Coleman, pg.
“It has been said that one of the greatest political problems of the time is to reconcile representative institutions with good government.” With this problem in mind, the cabinet form of government, which is nearly synonymous with the parliamentary form of government, has been established to lessen the gap between representative institutions and good government or, if possible, make them one in the same through its unification of powers.
The central purpose of Beyond Religion is to place emphasis on the inner qualities and values of an individual rather than devoting too much effort on external or material aspects of life. Mankind has endured many challenges since the beginning of time and yet we continue to face many problems. Despite our advances in medical science, technology, education, healthcare, human rights, laws, etc., we still suffer, struggle, and encounter many crisis around the world. Many parts of the world still experience poverty, crime, injustice, inequality, corruption, social, and environmental problems. The book asserts that these problems are a result of neglect of our inner qualities and moral values not just based on religious beliefs but the qualities that we appreciate in others. If each individual would take a moment and focus on developing his or her inner qualities and moral values such as integrity, compassion, generosity, forgiveness, tolerance, honesty, patience, kindness and so on then the world that we live in would become a better place.
Modern Catholic social teachings trace its beginnings to the writings of Pope Leo XIII. His insight on Christian philosophy, politics and the social order and applies to teachings in current injustices in the economic order. Leo XIII’s teachings were also critical participation in the developments of modern social and economic life. He rooted his social ethics in the supreme value of the human person and added that all political and social structures need to respect and respond to this primary and moral claim of human dignity. While the Church and the political community are autonomous and independent of each other in their own fields, the Church is “at once the sign and the safeguard of the transcendental dimension of the human person”.
This fusion of power allows the people’s representatives in the legislature to directly engage the executive in debates discussion in issues that will bring positive development in the state. This is not possible in the presidential system since the legislative and the executives arms are constitutionally separated and thereby restricted to engage the legislature in a discussion in which reasons are advanced against some proposition or proposal. The outcome is that party leaders in parliamentary system are more reliable than those in presidential systems. Presidential systems have turned the aim of electoral campaign into personalities rather than platform and programs because the focus is on the candidate and not on the party in general. But parliamentary systems on the other hand focus much more relating structured they do not do anything outside the scope of the party. We can compare the quality of leadership or administration in British, Canadian prime minister to the United State president. In all the country presidential system of government are chosen because people think been a good leader is by popularity and the ability to win election not minding if the candidate is fit for the task of presidency. But in parliamentary system, the person that has high quality of leadership competent enough and trustworthy is
Our human nature, how the social-norms, and forces of culture and religion can bring people together for cooperative success or can divide people for persecution and suffering. No other religion is this more true for then Catholicism. A religion so powerful that it is currently one of the largest financial powers in the world. The Catholic Church is one of the oldest continuous religious institutions in the world and has played a prominent role in the history of Western civilization.