Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Surveillance cameras invasion of privacy
Pros and cons of government surveillance
Arguments against state surveillance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Surveillance cameras invasion of privacy
Our society would not survive in the 21st century without the help of electronic surveillance. Safety is one of the main purposes of electronic surveillance. Safety is the state of being secure and free from danger of any sort. Today, many would rather give up their privacy for safety (Smithsimon). In fact, surveillance gadgets such as cameras, radio tracking chips and house alarms are used in many places to ensure safety. For instance, a parent can easily place a hidden camera in a stuffed animal in order to see how the babysitter handles his or her child (Public Places Have Eyes). Cameras are also used to ensure safety on school premises. According to the GCC College Safety website, "the college has an extensive system of surveillance cameras [which] monitors and records [everything in order] to enhance safety and security on the campus." These cameras monitor all parking lots, walkways, and athletic fields to prevent any harm on the students and employees. Another surveillance gadget on the rise is called the radio tracking chip which is a human tracking device inserted under the skin. As a matter of fact, the country of Brazil has a 2,000-person waiting list for these gadgets in response to help the rate of their nation's kidnappings and to promote safety (Human Inventory Control). In addition to cameras and tracking devices, house alarms are another tool used for safety measures. According to the ADT safety website, they provide the ADT Security System which monitors for any smoke, fire, water leak, carbon monoxide and any medical alert situations. Many home owners purchase alarm systems in order to feel safe in or away from their homes. All in all, safety is definitely one major reason why surveillance devices are widely use...
... middle of paper ...
...nity College. .
"Product and Sevices." ADT. Jan 2008. ADT. 18 Mar 2008 .
"Public Places Have Eyes." PC/Computing Mar. 2000: 100. General OneFile. Thomson Gale. Glendale Community College Library Media Center, Glendale, AZ. 18 Jan. 2008.
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan . "Watching the Watchers: Why Surveillance Is a Two-Way Street." Popular Mechanics. January 2008. Popular Mechanics . 2 Mar 2008 .
Scarborough, Senta. "License plate readers track down stolen cars." AZ Central. 6 Feb 2008. The Arizona Republic. 1 Mar 2008 .
Someone's Watching [videorecording]. NY Times/Discovery Times Channel Production. Discovery, [2005].
Smithsimon, Molly. "Private Lives, Public Spaces." Dissent 50.1 (Winter 2003): 43. Academic Search Premier. Glendale Community College, Glendale, AZ. 25 February 2008. Surveillance Tech. [videorecording]. [United States]: A&E Home Video, 2004.
We are in the 21st century and we do not have two way televisions, but we do have phones or as Mr. Ohm from the article “ That’s Not My Phone, It’s My Tracker” labels them tracking devices. I agree with Mr. Ohm on calling them trackers because that’s what they do, track us down and they know more about us than we do. Having “trackers” are both a good and bad thing. Good because as chief McDonnell says “they will help us to respond to crimes better and prevent other crimes.” They will prevent crimes because hacking into your phone could show messages and your location, and that’s a big lead for the police. Bad because we do not have privacy. Winston would say that they are helping the community to be safer since he is on Big Brother’s side and he “loves him” as he says on part 3 of the
Taylor, James Stacey. "In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance." Public Affairs Quarterly July 2005: 227-246.
Have you ever heard of the idea of body-mounted cameras on police officers? If not, David Brooks will introduce you to the idea that was discussed in an article from New York Times called “The Lost Language of Privacy”. In this article, the author addressed both the positive and negative aspects of this topic but mostly concerned with privacy invasion for Americans. Although that is a valid concern but on a larger scale, he neglected to focus greatly on the significant benefits that we all desire.
The Web. 4 Dec. 2013. Calamur, Krishnadev. A.P.S. & B.A.S. 5 Things To Know About The NSA's Surveillance Activities. NPR.com - "The New York Times" NPR, n.d. -
Richards, Neil M. "The Dangers Of Surveillance." Harvard Law Review 126.7 (2013): 1934-1965. Academic Search Elite. Web. 8 Feb. 2014.
The twenty first century in the century of technology, where technology is heavily used in the people daily lives. One of the field where technology is being utilized in is monitoring people through cameras and phone calls. Although it might be interfering with people privacy, but it has its advantages that might outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will discuss both points of view, and try to decide which one is more reasonable than the other.
Carr, Pete. “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty, With Real Dangers.” The Wall Street Journal. 6 Aug. 2010. Web.
Whitefield, Paul. “Yahoo webcam spying: When Big Brother morphs into Peeping Tom”. Los Angeles Times. (27 Feb 2013). Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
Surveillance cameras have helped hundreds of law enforcement agencies solve thousands of crimes throughout the nation. They have become so helpful that most law enforcement agencies are planning on setting them up on street corners, buildings, publication parks, and on their own officers. There are many cities across the nation that have began to use surveillance cameras. Setting up cameras is a pivotal technique to solving and preventing crimes. Although, it is often argued that having law enforcement surveillance cameras set up throughout the nations communities is an invasion of privacy, citizens should sacrifice a little bit of privacy in return for their safety and protection of civil rights against criminals and police officers.
Farmington Hills: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Print Kuhn, Betsy. Prying Eyes: Privacy in the Twenty-First Century? Minneapolis: Lerner Publishing Group, 2008.
History has revealed that once these surveillance technologies have been put up, departments can increase the number and quality of cameras without any opposition (Sprigman). And with all of the problems and prejudices that ravage America today, the police and government will be very tempted to put more as a precaution. Right now, there is no clear line between surveillance for protection and American values. But if this continues to get out of hand, surveillance systems might change into something much more sinister. Of course, there are numerous laws and established rules that prohibit audio recording individuals without their permission. But that is just for audio and currently, there are no similar rules for camera surveillance. As time goes by, the amount of public cameras increases and this will also bring minor changes to people’s personality and even characteristics. Similar to any technology that harms privacy, the benefits of deploying public surveillance systems must be accounted for, including the benefits and the costs. The main benefit is that it can prevent petty crimes but the chances are very small. Public surveillance can change people’s experiences and normal behaviors because it has a cold effect on the mass public. This carries a very real danger because anybody could abuse this power and in the long run, would not be able to protect us from very minor crimes, much less any acts of terrorism. Public spaces serves as a macro view but schools are a specific
Video cameras are being deployed around the nation to help with crime solving, but some people are concerned about their privacy. Having cameras to monitor public areas have shown to be useful in situations such as identifying the bombers of the Boston marathon in early 2013. There have also been issues with these cameras however, as people are concerned they are too invasive of their privacy and have been misused by police officers in the past. Some people want to find a balance in using cameras in public so that they can continue to help with crime solving while making sure they are not too invasive and are properly used.
The past decade has seen a proliferation of law enforcement security cameras in public areas, with central London having more cameras than any other city. In cities like New York, Los Angeles, and central London, cameras can be found at almost every intersection. Terrorist attacks have been a major basis for this significant increase in law enforcement security cameras; however, privacy advocates, along with many of the public, feel that it’s an invasion of privacy. People are concerned that all this video surveillance, which is continuously expanding, has created a “Big Brother” society, where people are constantly being watched. This creates paranoia and unease for people that just want to go about living their private lives, without feeling that their every move is being watched.
2) It is getting ever easier to record anything, or everything, that you see. This opens fascinating possibilities-and alarming ones.”
Powell, Robert. "Four Ways Technology Invades Your Privacy." Lovemoney.com. N.p., 5 Oct. 2011. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.