Watergate Case Study

1038 Words3 Pages

Discussion Question 6: Zinn portrayed the Nixon presidency and Watergate affair as secretive and scandalous. Nixon was known for being involved in “dirty tricks” regarding government secrets, corruption, and burglary. Nixon’s corruption infiltrated government along with major companies. For example General John Mitchell created a secret fund against Democrats to help Nixon, large companies gave illegal donations to his campaign, some of his cabinet members stole money, and his Vice President Spiro Agnew received bribes. This corruption also infiltrated the CIA and affected the FBI. Nixon himself took charge of the Watergate scandal in order to steal secret documents and information to aid his re-election campaign. After some of the burglars were caught, Nixon rewarded them with money to keep them quiet. Nixon also used government money for his own private homes and engaged in a secret bombing of Cambodia. …show more content…

Conservatives such as Schweikart and Allen support competitive Capitalism, and therefore admire “titans of industry” such as the Carnegies and Rockefeller’s influential industries. Another aspect of Schweikart and Allen’s conservative account was patriotism and imperialism, hence the name of the novel. The historians discussed many accounts in which the United States engaged in imperialist activities towards other countries in self interest. For example, during World War II the United States wanted to protect their self interest in Southeast Asia, as well as saving many American lives, and therefore dropped two atomic bombs on Japan. Schweikart and Allen justified Truman 's actions and agreed with the reasons behind dropping the bombs. Overall, by reading A Patriot’s History of the United States, one could realize their point of view demonstrated that the history of the United States should be taught with emphasis on the country 's strengths rather than

Open Document