Water Fracking History

1339 Words3 Pages

Zakisha Horton
Environmental History





It take 1-8 million gallons of water to complete each fracturing job. Enough water that can be provided to states like California and Colorado in the west that are experiencing little to no rainfall. Although water fracturing is a way to reduce the use of greenhouse gases. Fracturing is an unsafe process that harms our drinking water and health.
In the United States, drilling and fracking are exempt from the landmark environmental laws, including the Safe Drinking Water Act, thanks to loopholes Congress and regulators. 40,000 gallons of chemical are used per fracturing, it takes four hundred trucks to bring water to each site. During each fracturing 600 chemicals are used in fracturing fluid including …show more content…

Methane concentration is seventeen times higher in drinking water near facturing sites than normal wells. There are cases where the methane levels are too high in drinking water that people can set their tap water on fire. Contaminated well water is then used for drinking waters nearby cities and towns. “There have been over 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to areas of gas drilling. Also cases of sensory, respiratory and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water.” It is said that only a small amount of the fracturing fluid is recovered. Leaving the left behind chemicals evaporate and expose harmful chemicals into the atmosphere, creating contaminated air and climate changes due to the acid rain and ground level ozone.
To conclude, hydraulic fracturing pollutes our air and drinking water and hurts communities. Communities with fracking have seen declines in property values,and losses in tourism and agriculture. It worsens climate change due to the chemicals released in the process, and is linked to earthquakes. “ facturing produces approximately 300,000 barrels of natural gases a day”. It is not safe, think about the communities that are already suffering from droughts? Water used on fracturing projects can be used to supply states in the west where there is no fresh water to …show more content…

California's population is increasing, according to the article on the Colorado River “California's population is growing six million to estimated 19 million people in the next 45 years” some counties will have to sacrifice a portion of their water supplies and others not. California for example will not sacrifice any of its water. In fact, it will continue to receive its full portion. As painful as it sound, it gets worst, if the Colorado river continues to fall, Arizona will lose half of its water supply while California won't lose a drop. California has an interest in keeping their full share of water while others will suffer. Regulators know there is a water shortage, but yet they still allow fracking to happen.“99 percent of the state’s fracking sites are in the valley, which is also home to the bulk of the state’s agriculture”. With regulations put in place it will never make fracking safe. They are taking away water from other states like Nevada and Arizona so they have enough water to supply farmers , fracturing sites and communities. Whereas if they gave up fracting altogether states like Arizona, Colorado and Nevada won't have to find alternative water ways for

More about Water Fracking History

Open Document