Was Queen Elizabeth I An Exceptional Ruler?

The 44 year long reign of Queen Elizabeth I is to be characterized as the “Golden Age”. The determination of whether she was an exceptional ruler is up to debate. The characteristics that she provided for such a title, the definition of an “exceptional ruler," the way her people viewed her, and if her ruling had a correlation to the ruling of Julius Caesar all show that she did have exceptional tendencies along with considerable flaws and mistakes made along the way.
Qualities that contribute to the title of a great ruler include some such as integrity and open-mindedness and authenticity. These are only a few for those who wish to succeed at the throne and be deemed a favorable ruler. For one to rule greatly, they have to be bold and strong-willed.

To have these qualities will not make the job easier but to keep conditions under control. If leaders would focus on authenticity and commitment, this will rub of on the culture and have the ability to develop and maintain strong relationships. These traits are what a person in power should possess as it is a serious responsibility to hold power and shouldn't be taken lightly. Many aspects have to come together to make something substantial.
Queen Elizabeth I was known as a different kind of ruler: in what ways though? Great rulers are remembered; whether that be in the most excellent way or the lowest way is their choice. The Queen was known as quick-witted and clever as well and having ruthless tendencies but sentimental when needed. As a different kind of ruler, she did provide authenticity to her ruling and her tactics. Keeping her options open proved open-mindedness; relying on her own wits, instinct, and talent proved for independent traits as well as never giving into pressure. While she was a visible leader and created a glorious public image, she proved to be personally private.
The Queen usually avoided conflict which could be a considerable choice or a poor one. Avoiding conflict can reduce the causes for war and violence but it could also precipitate them. To avoid problems can result in strained communications, and putting off conflicts that will eventually rise to the surface. While Queen Elizabeth I provided an abundant of characteristics that fit into exceptional rulers, she did have her flaws, just like any person.
The people of England were thrilled to have forth a new queen.

The support of her people made Queen Elizabeth I the most famous monarch. This support came from her continuous devotion and reciprocated support to her people. The Queen took up issues after the death of her late sister, Mary, Queen of Scots. Towards the end of her reign, the Queen still continuously shows devotion to her people. Her lengthy time spent on the throne provided the people of her country with stability and consistency. Though there were some who were not so supportive of the Queen. Plots to assassinate her, such as the Babington Plot, were brought together by those who did not feel the devotion and time the Queen put in to helping her country. Though those who felt this dedication and faithfulness outnumbered those who didn’t by a great deal. To be a strong ruler, one should be for and of the people.
The similarities between Queen Elizabeth I and Julius Caesar seem to be slim. When Shakespeare had written “Julius Caesar”, the Queen had been on the throne for 41 years. She was just as strong in power as she was in the beginning. The immense amount of power in both of these rulers were similar. Although, the Queen’s removal from the throne as her last days came had similar dictatorial backsliding consequences on the nation of that Julius Caesar had. People had felt revolutions growing. New rulers coming into power could be a tremendous circumstance or and terrible unfortunate

event.
The ruling of Queen Elizabeth I had an abundance of exceptional aspects to it. Although she made mistakes, had flaws, and had those who were not supportive of her, she still proved to be great in power and leave behind her a legacy. She is considered one of the most exceptional rulers as her ruling was both long-lasting and extremely favorable.