Was Julius Caesar's Assassination Justified Analysis

“I love the name of honor, more than I fear death,” said the eminent dictator Julius Caesar. A man with that much passion and audacity was just what the Romans needed to become a global superpower. According to history.com, he was one of the world’s greatest military minds who laid the foundation for the Roman Empire. However, his growing power also placed a target on his back for those who feared it. Even though he was a part of the Roman Senate, he became so powerful that he acted alone as a dictator. This made the Senate nervous, so led by Caesar’s friend Brutus, they conspired to stab him to death before he or his many admirers made him king (Vernon). Julius Caesar’s assassination was unjustified because he was a brilliant military strategist and a generous and well loved political leader, however, many believe it was justified because he was a threat to the democratic government system.

Killing Caesar was a

ghastly mistake as he was adept at using his army to conquer lands and create structure in the empire. In the 50s B.C., he, Pompey, and Crassus, also known as the First Triumvirate, ruled the Roman empire until Caesar and Pompey went to war against each other after Crassus’ death (History.com). Subsequently, he won the war and joined the world of politics. Having a personal military and political power gave him the expertise to expand the Roman empire (Biography.com). Therefore, his murder was detrimental to the empire because he wasn’t there to take charge.
The assassination was also unjust because he was a generous and well-loved leader. Plutarch, a historian from the era, describes him giving money to people he deemed honorable and declaring that his riches were “but a public fund.” Also, he reformed the Roman calendar, strengthened the middle class, and provided security for the provinces (McManus). Perhaps what best encompasses him is how he created the form of political rule known as Caesarism, which is characterized by being loved by his people and ruling with a forceful military. Therefore, he didn’t deserve to die because he represented order and generosity in the Romans’ lives.
Some people believe that the assassination was just because he had too much power and was a threat to take over and create an autocracy.

However, this reasoning is faulty because of Caesar’s passionate refusal to be considered a prospective king (Mcmanus). Additionally, he was for the people. Even though he was much richer than them, his message was that of strengthening Rome as a whole. By use of force, political reforms, and laws, he would have been able to rule the empire without posing a threat to democracy.

In conclusion, Julius Caesar’s assassination was unjustified because of his expertise in military and politics and his good relations with the public. As an astute military leader, he was able to grow the Roman Empire to be the most influential in the world at the time. In addition. he helped reform the calendar and strengthen the economy. Finally, his popularity and forceful rule is what made him a great leader and what made Rome a powerful empire. With all things considered, his brutal murder was unnecessary, harmful to society, and

unjust.