Was Julius Caesar A Good Leader

739 Words2 Pages

The assassination of Julius Caesar was just because Caesar was a vengeful tyrant that became much too powerful after defeating some of Rome’s greatest adversaries; however, some believed that Caesar was a forceful leader who took necessary actions for a man in his position. Caesar was often seen as vengeful and spent a greater part of his dictatorship defeating his enemies and expanding his own power. In fact, Caesar’s tyrannical dictatorship even extended to his own peers. After defeating a great deal of his most prominent enemies, most of which happened to be Roman senators and generals, Caesar declared himself ruler for life. This declaration and the events that ensued left 60 Roman senators and politicians no other option than to remove Caesar from his throne. However, some saw Caesar as a just ruler despite his harshness, and say his actions were appropriate for a man of his time and social ranking. Forming alliances with Crassus, one of the wealthiest men in Rome, Caesar was able to obtain the position of Rome in 59 BCE as well as the governor of Gaul. It was during this time that Caesar neglected his duties as a political leader of great importance and strived for personal gain by attacking and enslaving Romans in Spain and Gaul. Furthermore, instead of facing prosecution for his actions, Caesar …show more content…

Additionally, Caesar attempted to defeat even more of his enemies by cancelling debts owed to them and forcing 20- 40-year-old Italians to remain in Italy. Caesar had his image imprinted on every coin, forced statues of him to be built almost everywhere, and either killed or imprisoned any of those who believed he was a tyrant. This behavior raised concerns among the senators who eventually decided to take

Open Document