Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius Caesar Death
Julius Caesar Death
Shakespeare julius caesar leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius Caesar Death
The assassination of Julius Caesar was just because Caesar was a vengeful tyrant that became much too powerful after defeating some of Rome’s greatest adversaries; however, some believed that Caesar was a forceful leader who took necessary actions for a man in his position. Caesar was often seen as vengeful and spent a greater part of his dictatorship defeating his enemies and expanding his own power. In fact, Caesar’s tyrannical dictatorship even extended to his own peers. After defeating a great deal of his most prominent enemies, most of which happened to be Roman senators and generals, Caesar declared himself ruler for life. This declaration and the events that ensued left 60 Roman senators and politicians no other option than to remove Caesar from his throne. However, some saw Caesar as a just ruler despite his harshness, and say his actions were appropriate for a man of his time and social ranking. Forming alliances with Crassus, one of the wealthiest men in Rome, Caesar was able to obtain the position of Rome in 59 BCE as well as the governor of Gaul. It was during this time that Caesar neglected his duties as a political leader of great importance and strived for personal gain by attacking and enslaving Romans in Spain and Gaul. Furthermore, instead of facing prosecution for his actions, Caesar …show more content…
illegally crossed the Rubicon with the 13 Legion, an action that was highly illegal and greatly concerned the lot of Roman senators. After his actions, a civil war was sparked in which Caesar defeated Pompey the Great as well as other high ranking Roman officials and officers. After defeating the most prominent of his enemies, Caesar declared himself dictator for life and shortly thereafter abolished all elections, decimated the power of the Tribunes, and essentially poured the foundation for future serfdom in Rome.
Additionally, Caesar attempted to defeat even more of his enemies by cancelling debts owed to them and forcing 20- 40-year-old Italians to remain in Italy. Caesar had his image imprinted on every coin, forced statues of him to be built almost everywhere, and either killed or imprisoned any of those who believed he was a tyrant. This behavior raised concerns among the senators who eventually decided to take
action. Caesar’s overwhelming power eventually lead to his assassination on the Ides of March in 44 BCE. He was killed by a group of 60-odd Roman senators who repeatedly inflicted Caesar with stab wounds from swords. Among Caesar’s conspirators were Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus, it is often said that Brutus was the last to stab Caesar. After the death of Caesar, strange happenings such as the burning of a comet in the sky for seven days as well as the ruin of the year’s harvest. Although Caesar was often seen as a vengeful tyrant who cared only for himself, some saw him as one of the greatest leaders of the time. This is because he created the 10th Legion and proved himself to be an adept military ruler. Also, Caesar reformed the Roman calendar and greatly increased the size of the Roman Senate. However, everything that Caesar did was only to increase his influence with the people of Rome. For instance, the only reason Caesar expanded the Roman Senate, was so that he could fill it with allies who would later advocate for him. Additionally, Caesar only ruled as dictator for a year before he was assassinated, the majority of his actions beforehand that are often seen as being good were only a campaign that Caesar was a part of in an attempt to gain popularity with the people, one which succeeded. Caesar’s rise to power was relatively quick but his downfall was even more so, and, although he may have acted as men of his time would, Caesar killed or organized the killing of numerous people and did nothing but advocate for himself and attempt to expand his power. Although Caesar did greatly reform parts of the Roman government and proved himself a skilled leader, it only took Caesar one year as dictator to try to imprint himself into the lives of the Roman people in the worst ways possible and secure his title as a tyrant. Furthermore, Caesar neglected Roman tradition and values in a variety of ways and endeavored only to gain power. That being said, Caesar’s assassination was just because he proved himself to be vengeful, tyrannical, and much too powerful.
Basically Caesar had many people disagree with his actions so they assassinated him.
When he repeatedly made reforms that aided the poor or veterans, the senate became worried. The senate was mostly concerned with personal gain so when Caesar stepped in and changed the tide, the senate became worried. They saw him as a tyrant with too much power who needed to be stopped. The senate did not like a democratic person taking full control over Rome as they would have no power. The only solution to this was to assassinate Caesar. The opinion of the sentence was, “Achievement was worthy of praise and honor, but excessive achievement was pernicious and a threat to the state.” (Holland). As Caesar grew, he made more laws which aided more growth. This cycle of growth seemed more and more dangerous to the senate, as they feared someone with this level of power. With all of the influence of Rome in one man, many felt Caesar took on a dictatorial
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
Clearly, Caesar contributed significantly to preventing the destruction of Rome and therefore, he should not have been assassinated by the conspirators. Caesar should not be assassinated by the conspirators because they had personal reasons for hating him. Firstly, they hated Caesar because they were not trusted by him.... ... middle of paper ...
It was clear to the people of Rome that the concerns of the common man were now of little importance to the aristocrats that held positions in government. Additionally, new policies paid the army with gold and land instead of it being a public service for the good of the Roman Republic leading soldiers to be more loyal to the generals than the republic itself. Julius Caesar, a successful military leader, utilized the control he had over his soldiers to rise to prominence in Roman politics in 78-60 BCE. Caesar joined the 1st triumvirate, a mutual split of power between himself, Pompey, and Crassus for control of Rome, but after the death of Crassus and the defeat of Pompey in Northern Italy was the only remaining leader. Caesar then focused on social and economic reforms that addressed the class inequality that resulted from the aftermath of the Gracchi brothers, subsequently making him very popular with the commoners. Caesar most likely saw his popularity as an advantage, knowing that having the people of Rome on his side would make it much more difficult for him to be stripped of his title. Unfortunately, popularity would prove not to be enough to keep Caesar in office. Because Caesar’s initiative was focused around the concerns of the common man, some of Caesar’s senate did not approve of the way he was utilizing his power. In 44 BCE, Julius Caesar would be stabbed to death while in a senate meeting. Upon hearing that Caesar had fallen to the aristocrats, his followers, mostly commoners, were enraged and caused the Roman Republic to go into a state of disarray once
Julius Caesar however, did enjoy his standing power which could be construed as an unfavorable account to his political image, which was quoted as such in the article “This act, along with his continual effort to adorn himself with the trappings of power, turned many in the Senate against him.”(The Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC) This power which Caesar possessed could have given him an inherent selfish attitude and support the outcome that Caesar was egocentric. In an article written called “Plutarch: The Assassination of Julius Caesar, From Marcus Brutus (excerpts) Translated by John Dryden, the account of the assassination was similar. This article shows that Julius Caesar very much in power and needing to be stopped for the betterment of the Republic of Rome due to his arrogant leadership was essential. His political agenda was longing in power and control, however Caesar still had followers who conceded in his proposal or else too scared to take opposition. An article written and titled “Julius Caesar: Historical Background” shows facts very similar to
Caesar for some what of a good reason. Brutus killed him because he thought it would be better for Rome while the others just did not want him to become more powerful than themselves. They are the same. Brutus felt that the death of Caesar would be the end of the absolute rule that Caesar presently had a. Brutus is a supporter of the republican government. Brutus says, "We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar /
Julius Caesar emerged. He was able commander who led many conquests for Rome. In 59 B.C. Caesar set out for a new conquest. After nine years of constant fighting, he finally conquered Gaul. Pompey grew jealous of his achievement and had the senate order him to disband his forces and return to Rome. Caesar secretly crossed the Rubicon and killed Pompey then entered Rome. After crushing many rebellions, Caesar forced the senate to make him a dictator. Caesar launched many reforms such as public work programs and giving land to the poor. According to legend those in the senate murdered Caesar on March 15. Caesar's Grandnephew, Octavian, and Marc Anthony joined forces to capture his killers. However bitter feuds grew it soon became a battle for power.
The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the senate’s fear of losing political relevance. They were losing their freedoms and thought the only way to resolve this problem was to kill Caesar. Killing Caesar never really did anything to help make the government a democracy like the senate had wanted. Marcus Brutus and Cassius ended up leaving Rome, so their plot did not do anything to help them. Caesar was the leader of Rome, the top of the Roman Empire. The people he thought he could trust most, his so-called friends, took him to the bottom of the Roman Empire, to his grave.
Caesar had fled Sulla’s demand, which started his military career. In the military, he first served in a province in Asia followed by one in Cilicia. During these times, Sulla had already experienced what death felt like which allowed Caesar to return to his hometown in Rome. Beginning a career in politics, he traveled to Rhodes where he was abducted by pirates. Just as he outsmarted the pirates, he was able to construct his own naval force in which he used to capture the pirates and kill them. In 74 BC, Caesar put together his own private army and successfully battled with an enemy of Rome who had declared war on them. Mithradat...
Caesar was sole consul and at times acted like a king. The senate did not like this because the Romans held the tradition of a hatred of kings. It was then that the senate believed that Julius Caesar was a threat to the Republic. The senate and everyone liked Caesar, but they had decided that the best way to save the Republic was to assassinate Caesar. This was yet another piece of the game that was pulled out of the structure of the Roman Republic. Yes, the Romans were able to destroy the person that they thought was the threat to the Republic, but it was the position not the person that was the threat. With Julius Caesar gone, the void was still there for someone to fill.
Having crushed every one of his foes, Caesar was conceded a 10-year tyranny for reasons for reestablishing the republic. His answer was to reconstitute himself as a Roman type of Hellenistic celestial lord or ruler. Since 510 BC nonetheless, the Romans had prided themselves with having acquired their flexibility by removing their Etruscan King. The very word ruler, REX, was an abomination to the Republic attitude. Roman natives had a municipal obligation to stifle any endeavor at oppression however political death and could do as such with exemption. Albeit deliberately keeping away from the title "rex", Caesar endeavored to gather for himself all aspects of sacred power, serving in the meantime as despot, as diplomat, as Pontifex Maximus, and as Plebeian Tribune forever. In mid 44 BC he announced himself DICTATOR IN PERPETUO (really recorded on his coins). He was killed by a trick of around 60 odd representatives a couple of weeks after the fact. Now the point of reference of tenet by one man had been built up at Rome. The main inquiry remained which of his supporters would in all probability succeed him to this position. This ended up being his extraordinary fabulous nephew, C. Julius C. F. Caesar Octavianus, or
Finally his sudden death was the result of various personal factors that insulted the senators and created hate between Caesar and them, believing his death was expected. His death then led to a domino effect, which ends in the eventual collapse of the Roman Empire. Caesar was assassinated by his own Senate. Julius Caesar had many men conspiring against him with a plot to assassinate him. Among the 60 men plotting to murder him, many were senators, which included Marcus Junius Brutus, Decimus Brutus Albinus and Gaius Cassius Longinus. Brutus believed the death of Caesar would bring the return of the old Roman spirit unfortunately, the city was in shock, and people became increasingly more aggressive, because Caesar was popular with the people of Rome. Unfortunately, peace was impossible and the conspirators fled to
“If you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases observe it,” said Julius Caesar (Julius Caesar). Ironically, this motto led Caesar to both his rise, and fall. Caesar gained power and popularity through his military might and tactics, making him a dangerous foe. He defeated everyone he faced on the battlefield. Including winning a brutal civil war between him and his once ally, Pompey. As a result, he was thrust into the position of king in Rome in all but title as Rome was still a Republic and only had temporary dictators in time of crisis (Ushistory.org). The senators and other politicians feared for their political careers and the livelihood of the Republic because Caesar was adored by the Roman public so much that they would have made him king. Additionally, the Senators had allied themselves with Pompey to ward off Julius in the civil war. However, they didn’t surrender to
At a young age Caesar realized that money was the key to Roman politics. When Caesar was fifteen years old, his father Lucius died. After that Caesar realized that he didn't have to be involved in a modest political career like his father did. Instead Caesar now set out to improve himself. His first step in doing so was marrying into a more distinguished family. Furthermore he began building a network of connections, some of the politicians were currently out of the supporters of Marius. These were dangerous contacts to have because Sulla, dictator of Rome, was seeking to kill any Marian sympathizers. When Caesar was 19 he was arrested. His friends persuaded Sulla to release him but Caesar would have to leave Rome.