Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eassy War against terrorism
Eassy War against terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eassy War against terrorism
How the United States Has Been and Is Fighting Terror
Matt Ruiter
Professor Buchanan
POS 111
25 November 2015
On September 11, 2001 the United States finally understood the reality of terrorism. As people watched The World Trade Center collapse, terrorists became more than a group of Muslims in the Middle East. After that fateful day, terrorism became a real threat, and the United States declared war on Terror. Since then, American soldiers have been sacrificing their lives to keep the United States free from many foreign terrorist groups. The background and history of the terrorist groups helps the United States understand the culture and motivation for the attacks. Therefore, since terrorism is ever present, the United States has
…show more content…
launched another anti-terrorism campaign in Iraq against a rising terrorist group. The changes to the military were more use of Special Forces, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles. Operation Iraqi Freedom began in 2003, to fight the terrorist group forming there. The United States believed that the Iraqis were planning on making weapons of mass destruction. The Iraqi’s had gathered 550 tons of yellowcake uranium, which could be weaponized . Though this they never made a WMD, they had stockpiled amounts of poison gas, and distributed it to tribesmen to use in case of an attack. On the 20th of March, 2003, U.S. troops began invading Iraq. By using ground forces, artillery, and amphibious attacks, Baghdad, Iraq’s capital, which was ruled by Saddam Hussein for the past 24 years, fell on April 9th, 2003. This brought the invasion of Iraq to an end. Though there were various other small uprisings, the largest part of the War on Terror was …show more content…
The use of Private Military Companies (PMCs), Special Forces, as well as declaring war on these terrorists, all have been proposed. PMCs would be very effective since they are specially trained, and have the funding and equipment needed. They would be able to go in, neutralize the threats, and train the local people how to defend themselves and keep these groups from rising again. However, since the U.S. would authorize these companies to go in, they would be to blame if anything went wrong, or later retaliate would be aimed at the government. Also, PMCs are extremely expensive, since their training and equipment are top notch. Many problems arise if the United States put its own military on the ground. However, the main factor that keeps President Obama from putting boots on the ground, is the Rules of Engagement limit what the military can and can’t do. Even if the President declared war against ISIS, many actions are limited and therefore ineffective. All of these have their pros and cons, but so far, Congress believes that the cons far outweigh the
Host: On September the 11th 2001, the notorious terror organisation known as Al-Qaeda struck at the very heart of the United States. The death count was approximately 3,000; a nation was left in panic. To this day, counterterrorism experts and historians alike regard the event surrounding 9/11 as a turning point in US foreign relations. Outraged and fearful of radical terrorism from the middle-east, President Bush declared that in 2001 that it was a matter of freedoms; that “our very freedom has come under attack”. In his eyes, America was simply targeted because of its democratic and western values (CNN News, 2001). In the 14 years following this pivotal declaration, an aggressive, pre-emptive approach to terrorism replaced the traditional
The war in Iraq was declared in March 2003 for many reasons. Some of the reasons are to free Iraq, the oil, and because Saddam Hussein did not allow weapons inspectors search for nuclear weapons. The US wanted to take over Iraq and free its people from the torture they had been enduring for so long. Saddam Hussein had developed weapons of mass destruction that posed a long-term threat to America. He denied weapons inspectors access to search for nuclear war weapons and this served as a threat to other countries. The aim had been the destruction of the Iraqi society enabling the US and Britain to gain control of Iraq's huge oil reserves.
Even though the invasion seemed like it succeeded, internal conflicts in the troubled regions led to the Iraq War that began in 2003, also known as the second Gulf War.
The Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, believed that maintaining fixed positions against the coalition forces would be a great strategy. The ground invasion by the coalition was a conventional offensive to confront the resistance from Iraqi troops, mainly along borders with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Faced with imminent defeat, Saddam Hussein decided to burn approximately 640 Kuwait wells. The goal was to cause the most destruction possible and make the coalition mission more difficult. On 24 February, the Coalition Army infantry attack began with an invasion of soldiers backed by tanks (Zarpelão, 2010). The last phase of the ground offensive culminated with the beginning of the Battle of 73 Easting. The battle showed that even knowing the terrain, the weather, and the number of Iraqi forces, the coalition had equipment and technology superior to be successful in conventional
On March 18, 2003 the United States invaded Iraq. (The Washington Post) The War with Iraq is a very divisive issue around the world. Turn on any news show and you will see a daily debate on the pros and cons of going to war. Because of the situations that have occurred between the United States and Iraq, very different views and perceptions have developed. Much debate on the justification of the United States for being in Iraq, let alone overthrowing its “government”, has been presented from both sides – the Hawks and the Doves.
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
Secretary of State Colin Powell (directed by the U.S. government) reported in a speech given on Feb. 5, 2003 that Saddam had both the materials and the means to create weapons of mass destruction and also had links to the terrorists in al-Qaeda ("The Path to War"). This declaration led the United States declaring on March 17, 2003 that Hussein and his sons had 48 hours to leave the country or else the United States would take military action ("Iraq Timeline"). Hussein and his family did not comply, and on March 20, 2003, George W. Bush started bombing Iraq, particularly where Saddam and his officials were thought to be hiding. On May 1, 2003 President Bush declared the conflict over, a mere 42 days after the fighting officially started.
Historical Significance: The September 11th, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, orchestrated by Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden, were the events that launched the U.S. War on Terrorism. Al-Qaeda’s attack on the United States was carried out by members of radicalized Islamic groups, whose objective was to spread jihad against the secular influence of the West. This tragic event provided the historical b...
...n October 7, they ran Operation Enduring Freedom. The war on Iraq that occurred in 2003, does not follow my theory, but did occur. The United States went to war with Iraq in the basis of preventive warfare. Many believed that Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein, were secretly gathering weapons of mass destruction; so the U.S. decided that they were no longer going to wait to be attacked before they went to war, so in March of 2003 the U.S. went to war.
On March 20, 2003, the combined military forces of the United States and Britain crossed the southern border of Iraq and Kuwait with the intent of capitulating the government of Saddam Hussein. Over the course of 21 days, the joint task force moved quickly and decisively to seize major objective cities along the road to Baghdad using aviation, armor, artillery, and infantry. Following the overwhelming success of the primary combat operations of the invasion, stability and support systems proved insufficient as sectarian violence and other criminal activity among the local population of Iraq increased.
It’s astounding how easy it is to forget that we are at war. Just recently, the Obama administration has declared war against ISIS. During his ISIS war speech, he refers to the enemy as “barbarians, terrorists and monsters”. He also promised to defeat ISIS, without the use of ground troops (Winsor). We do not like to watch our fellow Americans deployed to dangerous oversea locations. The President bashes ISIS and promises not to get completely involved with the conflict in order to gain support for the war. Unfortunately, his tactics are ineffective. A survey conducted by CNN shows that about 57% of Americans disapprove of how Obama is conducting his war on ISIS (CNN). Additionally, about 40% of Americans don’t believe we should fight ISIS
The Iraq War was a protracted armed conflict that began with the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a US-led coalition. The US wanted to destroy Saddam Hussein’s regime and bring democracy. To addition to that, US and its allies believed that Iraq had secret stocks of chemical and nuclear weapons, hence Iraq was a threat to the world (Axford 2010). In March 2003, US air bombed Baghdad and Saddam escaped Iraq. The invasion disarmed the government of Saddam Hussein. President Bush in March 2003 gave a premature speech, that tyrant of Iraq has fallen and US has freed its people. President Bush flew into Iraq to show the world that the war is over, even though nothing was accomplished (Kirk et al. 2014). Iraq was facing 13 years of scantions, therefore regime diverted its resources to flexible networks of patronage that kept it in power (Dodge 2007, 88). Iraq faced widespread of lawlessness and after the violent regime changed US could not control the situation. Iraqi civilians were looting, attacking ministries building and this resulted into a series of event (Kirk et al. 2014) . From a military perspective the regime was taken down, but they made no commitment to rebuild or secure the country.
What should be done is keep a watchful eye on ISIS from a distance. The United States should leave ISIS to be destroyed by the other Sunni tribes of the region. Let those leaders decide what should done and they can act upon it. Terrorism expert, Richard Barrett says this,“It advertises itself as the one place on earth where a Muslim can live according to the rules and customs of his religion without any reinterpretation of or deviation from the practices established by its founders. It does not just ask for people who can fight; it makes a very public appeal to all Muslims, whatever their ages or skills, to come and help build every aspect of the state” (Barrett). If the surrounding tribes in the region are allowed to handle ISIS on their own without adding to the chaos, it will keep the issue on a simmering heat, as opposed to a raging fire seeking to take over the
On September 11, 2001, the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon changed the mindset and the opinion of nearly every American on the one of the most vital issues in the 21st century: terrorism (Hoffman 2). Before one can begin to analyze how the United States should combat such a perverse method of political change, one must first begin to understand what terrorism is, where it is derived from, and why there is terrorism. These issues are essential in America’s analysis of this phenomenon that has revolutionized its foreign policy and changed America’s stance in the world.
Terrorism is one of the most extensively discussed issues of our time and at the same time it is also one of the least understood. The term itself “terrorism” means many different things to different people, cultures, and races. As a result, trying to define or classify terrorism with one universal definition is nearly impossible. The definition of terrorism used in this research is a reflection of much of the Western and American way of defining it. The definition of terrorism is,