Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nineteenth century farming
Nineteenth century farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nineteenth century farming
Kolten Grieve
300111104
Group A- Essay #3 question Working on the farms in one’s community in Canada was a typical way of life in the early eighteenth century. Families exchanged goods and services with each other, life was organized on a small scale. Bonnie Fox explains that the center of life for the countryside villagers, no matter what the size of the area was the farm. The farm was the center of the household, their lives were focused on the farm and the work they performed on the farm. The introduction of wage labouring in Canada changed the social network of families (Fox, B 2014).
…show more content…
The stress of rent and taxes drove many families to leave the homestead land as they were suffering terribly. Many families were forced to start working outside of the property as they just couldn’t survive on the homestead alone any longer. Some peasants went on to work as agricultural labourers on large farms, or worked in the cottage industry as weavers and craftsman. These cottage workers worked for wages but were able to remain on their land and control the pace of the manufacturing, which assisted with maintaining stability within the family. The agricultural workers though had to leave their families to earn wages. Both urbanization and proletarianization were created as a result of wage labouring in Canada. The daily stress of low wages, creation of poverty, also affected spousal relationships which resulted in the entire family looking for answers as to how to help each other (Fox, …show more content…
Output of supplies was quite low, the variety of job choices was limited although many workers were needed. This had an effect on the happiness and stability of the family. Men and women were both needed as well as teenagers, only the very young children were allowed to escape the labour market. Families spent their time working and supporting their family and each other. The head of the household in this cultural group decided upon the roles each member took. The oldest son took care of the family and helped the family prosper. There were families that had property at this time and there were property less families, both families worked hard to support each other. The rural families farmed their own food, whereas the urban families used the market place to support their needed. These disparities affected the family unit, as they had to work more diligently at pay for their goods (Fox,
Eric Strikwerda, “‘Married Men Should, I Feel, be Treated Differently’: Work, Relief, and Unemployed Men on the Urban Canadian Prairie, 1929-32,” Left History Vol. 12, No. 1 (Spring/ Summer 2007): 30-51, accessed February 23rd, 2014, https://pi.library.yorku.ca/ojs/index.php/lh/issue/current
It was a time of great upheaval. Peasants were demanding that the land of the great estate owners be turned over to them because there was not enough land to provide food for all the villages. This caused the migration of many peasants to the factories.
The social and economic differences that divided the Family Compact and the common people of Canada can be traced back early immigration into Canada and a the socio-economic divides that rose before, during and after the period of rapid population growth that Canada underwent from 1815-1840. Before this period of po...
Before the introduction of industrialization, the family and the household was the basic unit of manufacturing in Western Europe. The family members would work together in commerce, and agricultural...
During the middle to late 1800's, thousands upon thousands of Americans, as well as foreigners, flocked to the mid-western part of the United States. They flocked to this area hoping to gain free or cheap land promised to them by the United States Government. Most of the "pioneers" left cities and factory jobs to venture out into the American prairies and become farmers. They left their homes, not only because the land was either free or cheap, but also because they wanted to leave the hardships of city life. However, as most would find out, prairie life had its' share of hardships, that far out-reached the hardships of city life. Among these hardships were the death of siblings and friends due to starvation and/or hard work. Pioneers also had to face the stresses and burdens of trying to make a living off of the land. Along with these stress's, they had to worry about how to make money off of the land. All of these hardships, as well as others,
Before a series of antitrust acts and laws were instituted by the federal government, it was not illegal for businesses to use any means to eliminate competition in late nineteenth-century America. Production technology was now advanced to the point that supply would surpass product demand. As competition in any given market increased, more and more companies joined together in either trusts or holding companies to bring market dominance under their control (Cengage 2). As President Theodore Roosevelt was sworn into office in 1901, he led America into action with forceful government solutions (“Online” 1). Roosevelt effectively regulated offending business giants by the formation of the Department of Commerce and Labor, the Bureau of Corporations, and antitrust lawsuits.
The young, recently married farmers living in the Great Plains during the 1930s had a terrible life. First off, being married meant having multiple people to provide for. This is more responsibility, and leads to dividing up the food between family members. Then, the country was also in an economic downturn, so the price of food and crops were low. Farmers already had debt because of new machines and land that was purchased during World War I to keep up with the demand during the war. Then the depression caused banks to fail, so farmers lost all their money that was in the bank. Everyday life was treacherous, and there were few amenities in the home, with no plumbing or electricity. Life was awful for a farmer during the Great Depression.
There appears to be widespread agreement that family and home life have been changing dramatically over the last 40 years or so. According to Talcott Parsons, the change in family structure is due to industrialization. The concept that had emerged is a new version of the domestic ideal that encapsulates changed expectations of family relations and housing conditions. The family life in the postwar period was highly affected. The concept of companionate marriage emerged in the post war era just to build a better life and build a future in which marriage would be the foundation of better life. Equality of sexes came into being after...
Farm life of the 1930s was really hard for all the farmers. They did lots to get through the 1930s without starving. In York county they didn’t indoor bathrooms, light or, heat unlike the people who lived in the towns of the 1930s.(Reinhardt n. pag.) to feed there family’s many raised their own food like chicken which gave them eggs, cows which also gave them beef and milk to drink. They grew vegetables for there from there garden. (Reinhardt n. pag.)Which families didn’t do it alone they had help from there neighbors to help them along the way.
... and men of the community would freely pick their jobs without being demanded. Both women and men received an evenly amount of hours. Most of the time the women would be taking care of household chores and the children while the men produced crops and did most of the farming. At one point a man named Lewis Ryckman, suggested a business of shoemaking which successful.
Some of women in this time period’s family roles are very similar to what is expected of them today. The most common jobs were “domestic work, including teaching young females their roles for later in life, cleaning the house, and preparing food” (¨DeVault¨). Men would often be working during the day. Women's jobs were very crucial because if all they did around the house. Not all kids were able to attend school so it was up to the mother. Though not every one was married at this time, “common arguments against married women working were that they were taking jobs away
As a child I remember hearing stories about a lost family fortune from my father’s side of the family. I never put a lot of stock into those stories, but evidently they were true. My father’s side was comprised of farmers for many generations. The Owens family owned thousands of acres of land in Kentucky, on which they farmed tobacco and raised horses and cattle. My father, Leland, blames his grandfather’s generation for whittling away the family’s money. Even with the loss of prestige of owning such an abundance of land, the family continued to farm. I suppose it is all they knew. They became good, working class farmers and small business owners, working on their modest-sized farms. But they did own the land which separates them from the working poor. The sizes of the farms dwindled over the generations; my father’s father, Harlan, owned about 30 acres in northern Kentucky. Harlan’s brother Ralph has expanded his wealth over time and now owns about 600 acres of land in Kentucky.
In 1820 we had at least one half million separate family economies trading with several thousand local economies. On small family farms, family members spent the majority of there time working to produce for there families own use. Each family farm was like its own economy, with free time and the stock of produce shared, jobs assigned to each family member, and chores expected. On farms with slaves or larger plantations, planters established routines and enforced them with rewards and punishments. Today's more unified economy is much better than the separate economies of the nineteenth century.
Kulikoff, A. (2000). From British peasants to colonial American farmers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
the family and women to take care of kids and the house. Jobs out in our society defines