Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Into the wild character analysis
The stronger character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Into the wild character analysis
W. H. Auden poem, “Unknown Citizen” speaks of a man who does an outstanding job of being the perfect citizen. He is the poster child of a prisoner but he doesn’t seem to know it. He’s not mentally free. He could possibly believe so but he’s trapped. Trapped by his peers and what’s expected of him. He’s not living for himself but for the “Greater Community.” The citizen does everything for the Greater Community possible expected of him as a man. Auden however states “For in everything he did he served the Greater Community. Except for the War till the day he retired” (6-7). This statement isn’t true. He served his country which in return he served to protect his community. Everything he did was always for the community. The citizen is an exceptional worker. “He worked in a factory and never got fired/But satisfied his employers.../For his Union reports that he paid his dues” (8-11). He was everything an employer could ever want. He did what he was supposed …show more content…
Was he happy” (34)? He then goes on to say “This question is absurd: Had anything been wrong, we should certainly have heard” (34-35). Auden is giving a sense of sarcasm. If all seems well, how could anything be wrong? Easily. The citizen did nothing for himself. He always lived to please everyone else, “The Greater Community.” When he dies people will speak very highly of him, but will he be able to say he truly lived? Most likely he won’t. But it is hard to say if the citizen was happy or not. It would depend on one’s definition of happiness. The citizen probably found himself to be very happy but maybe that’s because he was told what happiness was; what it should be. So to him his happiness may have been maxed out. But if a closer look is taken at his life, he didn’t know what happiness actually was. He did not one thing for himself. He basically lived a life of a slave with
people have to worked to get where he got to. He was just a simple man who from the
because he was a hard worker and came to work on time.” After saving money and working
young and he was living with only his mother and his brother. Therefore, poverty defined him as a
...ad noble intentions and was completely loyal to the state, but in the end he is only human and his main weakness was his poor judgment.
descions. Many, many people died that did not need to. How can a person be considered
At the time he was born, a slave child was not allowed to stay with their mother more than a couple months. He spent his childhood under the care of an older woman, who was kept as a slave just to raise the children. "I never saw my mother, to know her as such, more than four or five times in my life; and each of these times was a very short duration, and at night. " After that, the mother was sent off to another location so that the child would not have any ties to her.
is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, by reason of that fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or
What makes one person happy may not be enough to make someone else happy; everyone has different standards. For example a few extra dollars may mean rent for one person whereas a few extra dollars may not even make a difference to another person. There is no true definition on happiness. Mueller wrote “ happy ones who never raised their voice” which
After spending his night in jail, he “pitied” the government for what it has become. However, he ends his essay on a positive note by saying, “There will never be a really free and enlightened State, until the state comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly” (Thoreau 216). Although Thoreau does not like the current state of the government, he has faith in the American people by saying “A State which bore this kind of fruit, and suffered it to drop off as fast as it ripened, would prepare the way for a still more perfect and glorious State, which also I have imagined, but not yet anywhere seen” (216). Thoreau, throughout the duration of his essay, expressed how the current authority is unlawful. Despite his concerns, he is able to come to the conclusion that America, with the right people, has the ability to fix itself and be a “glorious” country. However, not everyone can have the same ending. After Bartleby was sent to prison, the Narrator often visited the odd inmate. One day, on a visit, the Narrator found him “strangely huddled at the base of the wall, his knees drawn up and lying on his side, his head touching the cold stones, I saw the wasted Bartleby. But nothing stirred. I paused, then went up close to him, stooped
'One has achieved success who has lived well and laughed often.'; This quote seems to sum up what is meant by success. If you are able to laugh often and much then you have definitely achieved happiness. The idea of living well, though, is a very broad statement. In order, then, to define success in relation to this statement, we must first define what it means to live well. There are three levels of success, in my opinion: societal success, personal success, and academic or professional success. If someone can achieve all of these three levels of success, they are someone who has lived well.
speech is given as a tribute to his doings. This man is depicted as a
“One has achieved success who has lived well and laughed often.” This quote seems to explain the meaning of success. If someone is able to laugh often then they have definitely achieved happiness. The idea of living well is a very vast statement. In order to define success in relation to this statement, an individual must be able to define what it means to actually live well. There are different levels of success: societal success, personal success, and academic or professional success. If someone can achieve all of these levels of success, they are a person who has lived life to its fullest potential.
Wystan Hugh Auden was born in York, North Yorkshire, as the son of George Augustus Auden, a distinguished physician, and Rosalie (Bicknell) Auden. Solihull in the West Midlands, where Auden was brought up, remained important to him as a poet. Auden was educated at St. Edmund's Hindhood and then at Gresham's School, Holt, Norfolk. In 1925 he entered Christ Church, Oxford. Auden's studies and writing progressed without much success: he took a disappointing third-class degree in English. And his first collection of poems was rejected by T. S. Eliot at Faber & Faber. At one time in his undergraduate years he planned to become a biologist. From 1928 to 1929 he lived in Berlin, where he took advantage of the sexually liberal atmosphere, and was introduced to the psychological theories of Homer Lane.
One may also experience happiness when he has expanded his business almost across the globe. One may also experience happiness when he has his meal in the most famous and expensive hotel. One may also experience happiness when he attends honorable parties. One can’t imagine an ideal life like this. But don’t you feel I have missed out something in the above examples – yes, I have thereby missed out the actual meaning of happiness?
...deals, the link between which forms the actions of the present. On the one hand he subordinates himself, but in no servile sense, to the customs and laws of his city and country…he acknowledges himself as a part of a great whole. But the complete citizen…is zealous for reform, and wishes to see each generation, including his own, reaching a higher stage.”