Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Voter id laws controversy
Argumentative essay on voter id laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Voter ID laws in the United States have begun to create controversy since the beginning of its adaptations in the early 2000’s. Voter ID laws in the United States is a law that requires U.S. citizens to have a special form of identification in order to vote in an election. The idea with Voter ID laws is that the state must make sure that the laws do not pose any sort of burden on the voters. These laws have been proposed in order to stop voting fraud. However, the institution of Voter ID laws have made trouble in states, including Texas, regarding to the various amount of identification requirements needed.
The idea of Voter ID laws began to sprung after the 2000 election, when George W. Bush won Florida after it was too close to call. The main issue that surfaced after the election was in regards to voter fraud. The first Voter ID law was the Help America Vote Act, which was signed into law by President Bush which required all first time voters of general elections to present a photo Id upon registering and voting. Help America Vote Act, or HAVA for short, was a coordinated attempt by Republicans to enhance security regarding the casting of ballots. HAVA also helped establish the Election Assistance Commission which would be in charge of creating new ballots and adjusting the security. This act was the first one that gave voters various options to use regarding the verification of their identity. After HAVA was signed into law, states began to act on the new proposals for Voter ID laws. Arizona was the first state to pass a Voter ID law, requiring citizens to have a state-issued photo ID when they were going to vote. In other states, proposals for similar laws began to pop up.
Civil Rights groups have launched various lawsuits...
... middle of paper ...
...4.
Houston Chronicle. Lisa Falkenberg, 11 Feb. 2014. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
.
Huffington Post. Ashley Alman, 03 Nov. 2013. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
.
National Conference of State Legislatures. Wendy Underhill , 26 Mar. 2014. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
.
Outside the Beltway. Doug Mataconis, 23 Aug. 2013. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
.
Pitts, Michael J.Neumann, Matthew D. "Documenting Disfranchisement: Voter Identification
During Indiana's 2008 General Election." Journal Of Law & Politics 25.3 (2009): 329-373. ContentSelect Research Navigator. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
The voter ID issue starts with certain laws that, in the US, require that a person show a form of official ID before they are allowed to register to vote. This issue has split both Republicans and Democrats. According to Kenneth Jost, “republicans say [voter-ID laws] are needed to prevent fraud and protect the integrity of elections. Democrats say the laws are not needed and are being pushed in order to reduce voting among groups that skew Democratic in elections especially Latinos and African Americans” (Jost, p. 171). Both of these perspectives are valid, and with an open mind, can both sides have important points about the validity and inclusion of elections. On one hand, it is crucial to prevent fraud and keep the elections free of error, otherwise the outcome could be an unfair ruling. On the other side of the argument, voter-ID laws can cause discrimination and prevent people from voting, also
Today, the citizens of the United States must push Congress to formulate an oversight measure to fix voter disenfranchisement. By itself, Supreme Court Ruling Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder does minimal damage to the voting process of the United States. The court ruled discriminatory practices of district actions half a century old unconstitutional, but left a responsibility for Congress to modernize the Voting Rights Act, to ensure that no district nor individual is discriminated against. Given the history of the United States’s voter suppression and the original need for the Voting Rights Act, a new, modern voter equality policy is of dire importance.
Voting is one of the citizens’ rights living in a country. In the past, not everyone can vote. Voting used to be for only white American men. However, our ancestors fought for that rights. Eventually, any American who are older than eighteen can vote, despite their race or gender. In addition, voter turnout is used to keep track of the voting. It is the percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election. Unfortunately, the voter turnout has been decreasing over time, and it means that there are less and fewer people who actually show up and vote. This essay will discuss the voter turnout in Harris County, Texas.
Voter ID laws eliminate all forms of voter fraud and restore integrity to elections, Government-issued photo IDs are inexpensive and easy to obtain, and voter ID laws don’t restrict the right to vote and restore confidence to voters. To begin with, what is voter fraud? Voter fraud is the illegal obstruction of an election. Voter fraud is composed of double voting, intimidation, undocumented citizens voting, tampering with electronic or paper ballots, as well as deceased voting. Some opponents, such as Attorney General Eric Holder, suggest that there is not a problem with voter fraud.
United States. Cong. Congress. FAS.org. By Linda Luther. 111 Cong. Cong. Rept. Congressional Research Institute, 12 Jan. 2010. Web. .
Light, Paul C., and Christine L. Nemacheck. "Chapter 7 Congress." Government by the People, Brief 2012 Election Edition, Books a La Carte New Mypoliscilab With Etext Access Card Package. By David B. Magleby. 2012 Election Edition ed. N.p.: Pearson College Div, 2013. N. pag. Print.
Presenting a photo ID before casting your vote eliminates the worries of non-Us citizens vote overcoming yours, while also decreasing multiple votes from the same person. In Texas alone since 2004 there have been sixty-six cases of voter Freud. The Voters ID Laws were passed to protect the voters rights not to abolish them. By protecting each voter’s rights enables them a greater opportunity to have their voice heard. Showing proper voters ID will restrict the number of illegal voters from casting a vote they do not have a right to. It will also prevent legal citizens from voting as if a deceased member of their family to increase their candidate in the election. Providing proper photo identification will reduce voter Freud, multiple votes, and protect voter’s
In the past decade, a total of 34 states have passed voter identification laws with the same guidelines from state to state. These laws require voters to show a proof of photo identification in order to be eligible to vote or receive a ballot at the voting polls. The initial purpose of the voter ID laws was to prevent voter fraud. However, the laws have made voting harder for some Americans, like minorities, women, students and elders by requiring a government issued photo ID.
Many have claimed that laws, such as requiring an ID to vote, are designed to prevent voter fraud. If this is true than voter fraud must be a significant problem and there should be evidence that such measures will greatly reduce fraud, however, this is not the case. Political scientist and author Lorraine Minnite reports her analysis of voter fraud in the United States in her book, Myth of Voter Fraud, and comes to the conclusion that, " ... criminal voter fraud is episodic and rare relative to the total number of votes in a given year or election cycle" (Minnite, 57). Other research has also found that laws requiring voters to present ID or proof of citizenship does not prevent the most common forms of voter fraud. In an article analyzing the effectiveness of voter ID laws, the author cites research conducted by the News21 pertaining to all reported cases of election fraud since 2000, they found that "14 percent involved absentee ballot fraud. Voter impersonation, the form of fraud that voter ID laws are designed to prevent, made up only 3.6 percent of those cases. (Other types included double voting, the most common form, at 25 percent, and felons voting when they were prohibited from doing so. But neither of those would be prevented by voter ID laws, either)"
Most would agree that voter identification should be required in order to cast a ballot. A valid ID can be obtained at any Department of Motor Vehicles for a minimal fee. This would minimize skepticisms during elections concerning the validity of voters. Voter fraud is on the rise and can certainly taint election outcomes. "Proponents of the law say not requiring a photo ID makes it easy for people to vote more than once or under names not their own, inviting fraud that compromises the integrity of elections" (Phelps). In today's time, the majority of individuals possess identification "to drive or buy alcohol" (Phelps).
Double voting is when someone goes and votes twice during the election but in two different places. Double voting is great evidence that the election is being tampered with. According to Fox News, it was reported that 52-year-old Robert Monroe was sentenced to jail in 2012. He filled out an absentee ballot and the commenced to drive all the way too Lebanon, Indiana to fill out another ballot with a different license. Yes, both of his votes were not counted but it still occurred. Another case of double voting was reported by News 21, they stated “Texas law entirely, but under a temporary fix signed off on by a federal judge, the state's voters won't have to show ID” meaning people will not have to show ID when going to vote. This gives people the opportunity to double, maybe even triple vote. Individuals without ID’s are able to just go in and vote. People will go to great lengths just so a candidate will not win, even doing something that may very well be illegal. Double voting is definitely pure evidence that the election was
There are two ways to win an election. One is to get a majority of voters to support you. The other is to prevent voters who oppose you from casting their votes. Occasionally, attempts at voter suppression are illegal dirty tricks, such as the phone-jamming scheme carried out by Republican operatives against a Democratic phone bank in New Hampshire in 2004. Some voter suppression is unintentional, the result of applying or misapplying changes in voting laws. However, voter suppression today is overwhelmingly achieved through regulatory, legislative and administrative means, resulting in modern-day equivalents of poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black voters from the ballot box in the Jim Crow era. However some examples are in Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell has implemented rules to carry out a new state elections law. Blackwell’s rules make it extremely difficult for small churches and other nonprofit organizations to hire and train voter registration workers and they expose voter registration workers to felony charges for making mistakes. In Texas Congressman John Carter has suggested implementing literacy tests and English-only ballots despite the existence of a federal law requiring minority language ballots at the polls.In Florida in 2004 Governor Jeb Bush was forced to deactivate a list of purported felons who were to be blocked from voting when the news media discovered that the list included Black, but not Hispanic, voters and that many people on the list were actually eligible voters.In California this year, nonsensical requirements for matching new voter names to existing state databases resulted in numerous voter registrations being
Giant print reference ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Pub. House, in the House of Representatives, 1994.
In Texas, there are more than 600,000 people who are eligible to vote but have no acceptable form of identification (Fernandez, Wise). Texas first implemented their photo identification laws in 2013 and since then voter turn-out has been reduced and elections have been swayed. Take Mr. Pete Gallegos, for example, who attempted to regain his congressional seat but narrowly lost in 2014 to republican Will Hurd due to voter identification laws enforced in the state of Texas. Ian Millhiser, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, covers Gallegos’ narrow loss in his article, “Study Reveals the True Scope of Voter Disenfranchisement in Texas.” Millhiser asserts that a large part of Gallegos’ loss in 2014was due to the implementation of strict voter identification laws that discouraged democratic constituencies from voting. Millhiser explains, “Five times as many non-voters who listed the photo ID law as the principal reason they did not participate would have voted for Gallegos rather than for Hurd” (Millhiser). Gallegos was defeated by a mere 2,400 votes in the general elections of 2014. The effects that voter identification laws have on elections are clear and it is absolutely vital that California withdraws from implementing these laws to avoid faulty