Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the media influences our political views
Media impact on bias
How the media influences our political views
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How the media influences our political views
Roc’elle Ray The 2016 election had America on the edge of their seats. But, the real scandal is the election may very well have been rigged. Donald Trump, one of the candidate’s in the election, claims that the 2016 election was rigged. This claim may very well be true. Three reasons why the election may be rigged are evidence of voter fraud, double voting, and the media working the election in their favor. On the other hand, there is no solid evidence the 2016 election was rigged. Monday, October 17, 2016 Trump tweeted, “Of course, there is a large scale of voter fraud before election day.” Voter fraud is an illegal interference with the process of an election. In Illinois, there was a case in which a woman voted for her dead husband. Auedry …show more content…
Double voting is when someone goes and votes twice during the election but in two different places. Double voting is great evidence that the election is being tampered with. According to Fox News, it was reported that 52-year-old Robert Monroe was sentenced to jail in 2012. He filled out an absentee ballot and the commenced to drive all the way too Lebanon, Indiana to fill out another ballot with a different license. Yes, both of his votes were not counted but it still occurred. Another case of double voting was reported by News 21, they stated “Texas law entirely, but under a temporary fix signed off on by a federal judge, the state's voters won't have to show ID” meaning people will not have to show ID when going to vote. This gives people the opportunity to double, maybe even triple vote. Individuals without ID’s are able to just go in and vote. People will go to great lengths just so a candidate will not win, even doing something that may very well be illegal. Double voting is definitely pure evidence that the election was …show more content…
By this, I mean the press doing anything they can to get voters to not vote for a candidate even putting out lies about them. According to, Foxnews.com, it states, “From Trump’s vantage point, the press is pounding him with past allegations of sexual misconduct from nine women, which he vehemently denies.” This means the press is hammering Trump with accusations of sexual misconduct which may not be true. This could have resulted in Trump losing votes and possibly being disqualified from the race. Also, from Foxnews.com, it says, “From the media’s vantage point, on-the-record allegations from the women accusing Trump are worthy of reporting, as they were in many cases during Bill Clinton’s sex scandals during the 1990s.” This quote means that even though Trump may or may not be guilty of these crimes it is necessary for them to report them. According to Newsbusters.org, they sate, “Donald Trump has received significantly more broadcast network news coverage than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, but nearly all of that coverage (91%) has been hostile.” Donald Trump gets bashed more than Hillary does on all forms of media. This is evidence that the media definitely has something to do with the rigging of the
The voter ID issue starts with certain laws that, in the US, require that a person show a form of official ID before they are allowed to register to vote. This issue has split both Republicans and Democrats. According to Kenneth Jost, “republicans say [voter-ID laws] are needed to prevent fraud and protect the integrity of elections. Democrats say the laws are not needed and are being pushed in order to reduce voting among groups that skew Democratic in elections especially Latinos and African Americans” (Jost, p. 171). Both of these perspectives are valid, and with an open mind, can both sides have important points about the validity and inclusion of elections. On one hand, it is crucial to prevent fraud and keep the elections free of error, otherwise the outcome could be an unfair ruling. On the other side of the argument, voter-ID laws can cause discrimination and prevent people from voting, also
Since Electoral system can change outcome of the election, it often misrepresent the will of citizens. In electoral system, candidate with most popular votes in states wins electoral votes regardless of difference in popular votes. That means, people living in urban areas support one candidate, they could easily mislead the result of popular votes. Smaller area with more population often drag result on one side than larger part with less population. Either it is a presidential election of 1888 or 2000 election, candidates with higher electoral votes happen to win against people’s popular votes. Candidate of election of 1888, Benjamin Harrison won seat in white house even if he lost popular votes because he carried electoral votes on his side. Furthermore, margin between electoral votes was less than one percent, but still Harrison became president despite of 100,000 popular votes difference! Election of 2000 came up with same scenario. Gore won people’s support but lost electors’; therefore he had to accept G.W.Bush as President. After all this, what we can believe is indeed, the Electoral College is such an unreliable representative of the...
Media concentration allows news reporters to fall victim to source bias, commercial impulse, and pack journalism. Together, all three of the aforementioned factors become known as horse race journalism, a cause for great concern in campaign media. In complying with horse race journalism, media outlets exclude third party candidates, reinforce the idea that politics is merely a game, and dismiss issues that directly affect voters and their day to day lives. Through horse race journalism, the media is mobilized in impeding an active form of the democratic debate in American politics. Even across the wide range of human values and beliefs, it is easy to see that campaign media coverage must be changed, if not for us, then for our children. It is imperative that we discern the flaws of the media and follow our civic duty to demand better media
With any decision, both parties (republican and democratic) campaign over the state to gain support from voters to increase their chances of being elected to the office that they desire. When voting most voters arrive at polling stations to vote, first for instance, they can be given a paper ballot on which they will select their choices and which later will be checked by hand; second they can be given a paper ballot on which they will select their choices with the assistance of a voting machine; or thirdly they can be given a sheet of paper with a numerical access code. Texans share a lot of the same essential needs of voting and nonvoting as other Americans. The republican party remains undefeated after a decade that saw fights over legislature redistricting, bitter and commonly intense campaigning around both inside and between the parties, continuously expensive battling up and down the ballot. In 2002, Republican competitors cleared all statewide races and took control of both houses of the Texas legislature, viably assuming the organizations of powers. The resulting year the legislative gathering returned to the distribution of districts for the U.S. House of Representatives the accomplishment of that offensive is seen inside the progressive changes in the delegations that are represented in the features of The Texas Delegation to the united states House of Representatives.
To begin with, what is voter fraud? Voter fraud is the illegal obstruction of an election. Voter fraud is composed of double voting, intimidation, undocumented citizens voting, tampering with electronic or paper ballots, as well as deceased voting. Some opponents such as Attorney General Eric Holder suggest that there is not a problem with voter fraud. He also says that voter ID laws are “unnecessary” and has kept them from being used in Texas and South Carolina (John Fund). The problem is that most people think that voter fraud is a recent thing made up by republicans so that they can get more votes in elections by coming out with laws that will keep some people that tend to vote democratic from voting. The truth is that voter fraud has been around since voting started, and is a growing problem that needs to be dealt with. Voter id laws seem to be the only sensible deterrent for voter fraud. I will admit the laws do have some flaws, but if we don’t get rid of the problem now it...
Voter ID laws in the United States have begun to create controversy since the beginning of its adaptations in the early 2000’s. Voter ID laws in the United States is a law that requires U.S. citizens to have a special form of identification in order to vote in an election. The idea with Voter ID laws is that the state must make sure that the laws do not pose any sort of burden on the voters. These laws have been proposed in order to stop voting fraud. However, the institution of Voter ID laws has caused trouble in states, including Texas, regarding the various amount of identification requirements needed.
Today it seems almost impossible to get a straightforward answer on any major topic from the media. All sources of media have a specific audience that they are intending to hear or view the information that they have prepared, therefore they will cut bits and pieces out so that only the message they are trying to get across will be received. So indeed there is a media bias, and yes it more often than not slants towards the liberal view point, as many reporters and journalists have liberal views themselves.
from voting, but are used by creating new laws that would prevent one’s ballot to be
The news media rejects the fact that they are biased. They claim that they are the “middle of the road,” and are neutral on the stories that they cover. Publishers also claim that they are the watchdog for the political system, and they make sure that the system is free of any corruption, or wrongdoing. Th...
If one were to look at the voting history as of late in America you would surely find information on the Florida catastrophe in 2000. The problem with our voting system today is in the technology being used; many demographic groups find our current systems confusing and hard to use. As voters step into the polling places this election year many will be voting through new devices some even sporting “touch screen” technology and we can only hope that the new technology is understood and accepted.
This is very wrong. Why do we still need this system of voting? I don't want a committee of people to decide the vote of an entire state of people. I don't want my vote reinterpreted as one vote for an entire state. That is really what is going on and will continue to go on unless the Electoral College is abolished. Voting is an obligation of citizenship. We will continue to vote and if it doesn't vote in your favor then your vote will be changed. This is why I think that each vote should be counted equally and accurately. The nation was at a stand still while the votes in Florida were counted and in the process of a recount.
Just three days ago, on the 19th, New York residents arrived to vote at a voting site in Queens, where all three of the voting machines were broken (2016). Bad voting experiences did not just occur in Queens that day, in Brooklyn voters arrived early to vote and were shocked to find out that the polling place did not open for an additional thirty minutes after it was declared time (2016). There were even instances where voters were turned away from polling sites because their party affiliation was changed, therefore, resulting them not to be able to vote. In regards to this, New York voters have decided to take further legal action and continue with a lawsuit, in hopes that they can still get the chance to vote (2016).
Newspapers and nightly news shows have become a business. They no longer go by the public services values they once stood by (Sensationalism, 2005). Instead of being the fourth branch of government, they are just like any other money making business. It is no longer a race to put out the truth; it is more a race for dollars and control. Sensationalism is purely fueled by money and popularity. If a news outlet garners a large amount of popularity, they can swing votes, and influence voters. Sensationalism has already affected many political situations. Sensationalism has proven to spread like a virus. If sensationalism is not controlled, there is no way the news outlets can be the advocate for the people.
...in the politically process could be a reality. Once a person's vote is stolen their voice is lost and the votes could be sold for a profit. The challenge to the validity of our future elections could destroy the confidence in our electoral process.
To this date, a lot of controversy exists surrounding electronic voting in all its forms. During elections employing electronic voting, sometimes mysteriously votes get deducted. Or even added. Bannet et al. [1] show that these machines can, with reasonable effort, be tampered with to do exactly what an adversary wants them to do. On the other hand, Clarkson et al. [2] worked hard on creating a system that tries to defend itself from these attacks. However, they have quite a few assumptions to make the system work. Voting machines have a lot of advantages and flaws, however, solutions are being made to make them more secure.