Vonnegut's So It Goes Philosophy Of Slaughterhouse-Five

849 Words2 Pages

The “So It Goes” Philosophy of Slaughterhouse-Five “There are no characters in this story and almost no dramatic confrontations, because most of the people in it are so sick and so much the listless playthings of enormous forces. One of the main effects of war, after all, is that people are discouraged from being characters” (Vonnegut 208-209). Slaughterhouse-Five is riddled with anti-war messages, and this quote explains a major one: a loss of meaning brought on by war. Vonnegut uses main character Billy Pilgrim to present and reflect on not the strategy, historical context, or glory of war but the pointlessness of war. Vonnegut experienced the horrors of World War II, specifically the bombing of Dresden, and effectively employs Billy to …show more content…

All the meaningless deaths he has witnessed contribute greatly to his loss of hope. Vonnegut makes this hopelessness clear by describing Billy’s devotion to the Serenity Prayer, which involves understanding and accepting the things he could not change. However, in Billy’s case, “among the things [he] could not change were the past, the present, and the future” (Vonnegut 77). Once he realizes he can change nothing about the deaths, his “range of affect is severely restricted, shown most prominently in the much repeated phrase 'So it goes,' his passive and emotionless reaction to tragedy and death” (Vees-Gulani 297). After the war, “Billy wanders thoughtlessly in life, eventually adopting a philosophy which justifies his purposelessness" (O'Sullivan 245). The hopelessness Billy feels leads him to fabricate the Tralfamadorian Philosophy, a viewpoint based on the belief that all things are predetermined. Granted “the inability of events, there is little reason to be overly concerned about death” (Telgen 265). Billy takes this message to heart and lives by it, and up to this point, it seems Vonnegut would be of similar …show more content…

It allows for an indifference that for Billy to overcome his misery is practically necessary. Throughout the novel, instances that parallel his past horrors cause Billy to return, or at least in his mind, to his life during the war. Therefore, “being ‘spastic in time’ thus is a metaphor for Billy's repeatedly reexperiencing the traumatic events he went through in the war” (Vees-Gulani 295). One incident in particular reveals what he believes to be the only cure for grief. While Billy is recovering in a hospital, he meets another former soldier Eliot Rosewater who deals with a similar crisis of finding life meaningless. Billy overhears Rosewater retort to a Psychiatrist, “I think you guys are going to have to come up with a lot of wonderful new lies, or people aren't going to want to go on living” (Vonnegut 129). Billy understands this pessimistic attitude, as he has just about exhausted every solution for his grief. Stemming from this idea, he “tries to develop new lies to live his life; but in his attempt, he creates the Tralfamadorians and their philosophy” (Brown

Open Document