Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” setting
Hamlet and mental illness
Critical essay on the yellow wallpaper by charlotte perkins gilman
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The theme of violence spans across countless works of literature. This theme is seen in the short story “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and in Hamlet by William Shakespeare. In Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the protagonist slips into a state of madness. Her repeated exposure to the same wallpaper drives her insane. While Gilman does not portray physical violence in this short story, she does depict psychological violence. On the other hand, in the play Hamlet, Prince Hamlet of Denmark has just learned his father was murdered. The ghost of his father appears to him and demands he seeks revenge. Hamlet spends the rest of the play plotting to kill his murderous uncle. Hamlet is riddled with scenes of physical violence. While …show more content…
both “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Hamlet by William Shakespeare depict scenes of violence, the psychological violence shown in “The Yellow Wallpaper" impacts readers differently than the physical violence shown in Hamlet; furthermore, the two different types of violence lead to a different release of emotion. “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman portrays the violence trapped inside Jane’s mind. The major act of violence in this short story is between Jane and herself. Jane is confined to her room at all times. Her husband forbids her from working and controls every aspect of her life. This controlling nature leads Jane to reflect all her emotion inward. This inward anger is shown when Jane writes, “I got positively angry with the impertinence of it and the everlastingness. Up and down and sideways they crawl, and those absurd, unblinking eyes are everywhere” (Gilman). This anger Jane demonstrates to the wallpaper is shown countless times throughout the short story. As the story progresses, her anger begins to slip into madness. Because she is unable to let out her emotions, Jane begins to reflect her psychological pain onto the wallpaper that lines her bedroom. She begins to see shapes in the wallpaper, and even pictures a woman trying to break out. The use of psychological violence creates a feeling of unrest in the reader. Readers expect the shock that follows a murder, but the shock that follows an act of psychological violence forces readers to look inward. The violence Jane inflicts on herself through her mind is hard to grasp. Everyone feels anger, and it is often hard to express anger in a positive way. Jane’s story shows a perfect example of how inward emotions can lead to psychological violence and how that in turn can become madness. On the other hand, Hamlet by William Shakespeare shows scenes of physical violence. Hamlet is seeking blood. His uncle murdered his father and how he wishes to do the same. There are many examples of violence throughout Hamlet. One such example is when Hamlet murders Polonius. Before Hamlet stabs the innocent man, he remarks, “How now, a rat? Dead for a ducat, dead” (Shakespeare 29). This statement shows Hamlet’s affinity for violence. His first thought when he hears the noise is that it is Claudius spying on him. Throughout the play, Hamlet acts out his violent impulses on others. These acts of external violence show the key difference between Hamlet and “The Yellow Wallpaper”. While Hamlet killing Polonius is only one of many times physical violence is included, the impact on the audience is always the same. Physical violence shocks the reader. It angers the reader, but it does not cause the reader to think. Physical violence is solely used for shock value. The nature of the violence depicted in each literary work defines the ending.
In Hamlet, Prince Hamlet is free to express his anger and inner violence on those around him. This free expression of anger shapes the outline of Hamlet’s future. Even before Hamlet succeeds in murdering Claudius, he expresses his anger out on Ophelia and Gertrude. Hamlet’s acts of violence lead to his casual murdering of Polonius in later scenes. These depictions of external violence lead to the many murders found throughout the course of the play. By including external violence that leads to murder, Shakespeare shows readers the danger of free expressions of anger. Hamlet’s anger was left unchecked. He was free to release his anger and pain on those around him. His anger never affected him, but it impacted everyone who came in contact with him. At the end of the play, multiple deaths take place. When he learns he is dying, Hamlet lunges at the king and forces him to drink poison. This is shown when Hamlet says, “Drink off this potion. Is thy union here?” (Shakespeare 357). On the contrary, in “The Yellow Wallpaper,” Jane’s inner violence leads to her taking her own life. Because Jane was never free to release her anger like Hamlet, she inflicted her violence on herself. Her slow decent into madness can also be contributed to this lack of release of emotion. While it is debated on whether Jane actually did commit suicide, Gilman writes that “[Jane is] securely fastened now by [her] well-hidden rope” (Gilman). Because of this quote, it can be interpreted that Jane did kill herself. Gilman’s use of inner violence and suicide creates a feeling of discomfort in the reader. Inner violence is hard to stomach. In Hamlet’s case, readers understand why Hamlet yearns for revenge. In Jane’s case, her apparent suicide is shocking. Even though her slow descent into madness is experienced by readers, her finally act still brings with it utter shock. While Hamlet is responsible for the death of many
characters, it is Jane’s act of suicide that cuts into the hearts of readers. In conclusion, the violence found in Hamlet by William Shakespeare and “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is not one in the same. In Hamlet, the external acts of violence portrayed lead to the murders found in later acts. In “The Yellow Wallpaper,” Jane’s lack of external expression leads to her suicide. These two portrayals of violence not only impact and shape the course of the play but also the readers. Jane’s suicide shocks readers. It forces them to come to terms with internal violence and affects everyone. In Hamlet, Shakespeare warns what can become of someone who lets anger and violence consume their life. While these stories deal with the topic of violence differently, they both offer important narratives that impact the world today. Anger cannot be bottled in or one may explode. On the other hand, anger cannot be freely expressed on others.
The Tragedy of Hamlet is a play written by William Shakespeare about a young prince trying to avenge his father’s death. In the beginning of the play, young Hamlet is visited by the ghost of his father, who tells Hamlet that his uncle, Claudius, killed him. Meanwhile Hamlets mother, Gertrude, has gotten married to said uncle. Now it is Hamlet’s job to kill his Uncle-father to avenge his dead father, a task that may prove to daunting for Hamlet. In Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Hamlet, the author uses diction and syntax to make Hamlet portray himself as mentally insane when in reality, he is sane thorough the duration of the play, tricking the other characters into giving up their darkest secrets.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet undergoes a transformation from sane to insane while fighting madness to avenge his father’s death. The material that Shakespeare appropriated in writing Hamlet is the story of a Danish prince whose uncle murders the prince’s father, marries his mother, and claims the throne. The prince pretends to be feeble-minded to throw his uncle off guard, then manages to kill his uncle in revenge. Shakespeare changed the emphasis of this story entirely, making his Hamlet a philosophically minded prince who delays taking action because his knowledge of his uncle’s crime is so uncertain.
Hamlet displays aggressive behavior towards others because he had no remorse for murdering his girlfriend’s father, and forcefully attacks all women in his life with words. The moment Hamlet realized that it was Polonius he killed, he reacted with “ Thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell. I took thee for thy better. Take thy fortune. Thou find’st to be too busy is some danger.” This quote proves that Hamlet did not care about murdering Polonius, even though Polonius was his girlfriend’s father. He did not know who he murdered, which meant he was okay with murdering anybody. Also, Hamlet did not think twice about his actions which proves that he is impulsive and doesn’t know what he is doing. Another instance when Hamlet aggressively
All of the madness in the play originates from Hamlet and the meeting with his father’s ghost. Here, Hamlet discovers the truth of his father’s death and the emotional affairs between Hamlet’s uncle, the now King, and his widowed mother. Despite the Ghost’s warning to leave his mom out of the problem, Hamlet confronts his mother about the events preceding his father’s death and the current state of the royal court. All the while, hiding behind a nearby curtain Polonius listens to the conversation. The way Hamlet is acting frightens the Queen and she cries out for help. Polonius in turn shouts giving away his hiding place. Unsheathing his sword, Hamlet leaps towards the wall hanging and stabs through it, killing Polonius who Hamlet mistakes as the King. He returns to his mother, and continues ranting to her about the differences between his murdered father and uncle. Then, the Ghost appears to Hamlet and chides him for the rough way he’s been treating his mother. At the sight of Hamlet’s unseen conversation, the Queen
The madness of each individual is not realistic, but the idea that death, grievance, and revenge can drive someone to do things that seem to be mad or make them do things out of their nature. Overall, we see that the theme of madness has a significant impact on the conflicts and overall development of the play as well as the characters themselves and is successfully conveyed. Shakespeare developed a theme that tied the many important emotions and ideas together to make the play what it is. He used Ophelia’s grief and love, Hamlet’s wit and ruminative nature to convey a theme that could be related to more than the one character, and tie all of the conflicts and complications down to one cause.
In "Man and Wife Is One Flesh": Hamlet and the Confrontation with the Maternal Body, Janet Adelman argues that the motivating force behind the plot action in Hamlet is the collapse of boundaries between relationships of individuals, sexes, and divisions of public (state) and private (love) life. The primary cause of the breakdown results from the bodily contamination spread through overt sexuality, specifically maternal sexuality. Janet Adelman asserts her feminism into the sexist view of psychoanalysis to define the contamination as that power of women that men fear.
Revenge has caused the downfall of many a person. Its consuming nature causes one to act recklessly through anger rather than reason. Revenge is an emotion easily rationalized; one turn deserves another. However, this is a very dangerous theory to live by. Throughout Hamlet, revenge is a dominant theme. Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet all seek to avenge the deaths of their fathers. But in so doing, all three rely more on emotion than thought, and take a very big gamble, a gamble which eventually leads to the downfall and death of all but one of them. King Fortinbras was slain by King Hamlet in a sword battle. This entitled King Hamlet to the land that was possessed by Fortinbras because it was written in a seal'd compact. "…our valiant Hamlet-for so this side of our known world esteem'd him-did slay this Fortinbras." Young Fortinbras was enraged by his father’s murder and sought revenge against Denmark. He wanted to reclaim the land that had been lost to Denmark when his father was killed. "…Now sir, young Fortinbras…as it doth well appear unto our state-but to recover of us, by strong hand and terms compulsative, those foresaid lands so by his father lost…" Claudius becomes aware of Fortinbras’ plans, and in an evasive move, sends a message to the new King of Norway, Fortinbras’ uncle.
In many stories there is a hero and a villain. There are also some stories where one person is both the hero and the villain. In the story of Hamlet there are multiple villains and no heroes. Everybody has a fault that leads to something tragic or dramatic during the story the main villain in this story is Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.
Revenge is a recurring theme in Hamlet. Although Hamlet wants to avenge his father’s death, he is afraid of what would result from this. In the play Hamlet, Hamlet’s unwillingness to revenge appears throughout the text; Shakespeare exhibits this through Hamlet’s realization that revenge is not the right option, Hamlet‘s realization that revenge is the same as the crime which was already committed, and his understanding that to revenge is to become a “beast” and to not revenge is as well (Kastan 1).
One of the most popular characters in Shakespearean literature, Hamlet endures difficult situations within the castle he lives in. The fatal death of his father, and urge for revenge leads Hamlet into making unreasonable decisions. In William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s sanity diminishes as the story progresses, impacting the people around him as well as the timing and outcome of his revenge against Claudius.
William Shakespeare's Hamlet is, at heart, a play about suicide. Though it is surrounded by a fairly standard revenge plot, the play's core is an intense psychodrama about a prince gone mad from the pressures of his station and his unrequited love for Ophelia. He longs for the ultimate release of killing himself - but why? In this respect, Hamlet is equivocal - he gives several different motives depending on the situation. But we learn to trust his soliloquies - his thoughts - more than his actions. In Hamlet's own speeches lie the indications for the methods we should use for its interpretation.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s behavior and actions cause readers to question his sanity. Hamlet’s character can be interpreted in many different ways. It could be said that he is indeed insane, or it can be disputed that he, as he made known, is simply putting on a good act. The complexity of knowing Hamlet’s true character derives from the fact that we, as readers, are unable to read Shakespeare’s or Hamlet’s minds. Therefore, judgments could be made solely by reading and interpreting his behavior and coming up with a satisfactory conclusion. Taking into consideration incidents such as Polonius’ murder and Hamlet’s contemplating suicide, it is natural for individuals who perform such acts to be categorized as crazy. Ignoring Hamlet’s actual actions, and paying keen attention to what altered his character, one can debate that Hamlet is not at all insane. It is important to consider the situations which triggered Hamlet’s different actions. By giving discreet thought to Hamlet’s position and what he endures, one will realize that he is not demented, but he is actually an angry, betrayed and emotionally devastated fatherless son.
Hamlet contains three plots of revenge throughout the five acts of the play. Young Hamlet, after getting a shocking realization from his father’s ghost, wants to enact a plot of revenge against his uncle. Laertes, who was struck twice in quick succession by the death of his father and sister, wants to kill Hamlet. Away in Norway, Fortinbras wants to take revenge on the entire nation of Denmark for taking his father’s land and life. These three sons all want the same thing, vengeance, but they go about it in wildly different ways, but as Lillian wilds points out, “he also sees himself in the mirrors of Fortinbras [and] Laertes.”(153) It becomes clear that the parallels presented throughout the play are there to further illuminate the flaws of
Hamlet is one of the most often-performed and studied plays in the English language. The story might have been merely a melodramatic play about murder and revenge, butWilliam Shakespeare imbued his drama with a sensitivity and reflectivity that still fascinates audiences four hundred years after it was first performed. Hamlet is no ordinary young man, raging at the death of his father and the hasty marriage of his mother and his uncle. Hamlet is cursed with an introspective nature; he cannot decide whether to turn his anger outward or in on himself. The audience sees a young man who would be happiest back at his university, contemplating remote philosophical matters of life and death. Instead, Hamlet is forced to engage death on a visceral level, as an unwelcome and unfathomable figure in his life. He cannot ignore thoughts of death, nor can he grieve and get on with his life, as most people do. He is a melancholy man, and he can see only darkness in his future—if, indeed, he is to have a future at all. Throughout the play, and particularly in his two most famous soliloquies, Hamlet struggles with the competing compulsions to avenge his father’s death or to embrace his own. Hamlet is a man caught in a moral dilemma, and his inability to reach a resolution condemns himself and nearly everyone close to him.
Hamlet is one of Shakespeare’s most well-known tragedies. At first glance, it holds all of the common occurrences in a revenge tragedy which include plotting, ghosts, and madness, but its complexity as a story far transcends its functionality as a revenge tragedy. Revenge tragedies are often closely tied to the real or feigned madness in the play. Hamlet is such a complex revenge tragedy because there truly is a question about the sanity of the main character Prince Hamlet. Interestingly enough, this deepens the psychology of his character and affects the way that the revenge tragedy takes place. An evaluation of Hamlet’s actions and words over the course of the play can be determined to see that his ‘outsider’ outlook on society, coupled with his innate tendency to over-think his actions, leads to an unfocused mission of vengeance that brings about not only his own death, but also the unnecessary deaths of nearly all of the other main characters in the revenge tragedy.