Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Woman oppresion in literature
Literature and gender equality
The influences of freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Woman oppresion in literature
To force me to give my fortune, I was imprisoned-yes: in a private madhouse…” (Maria 131-32). These lines from Mary Wollstonecraft’s (1759-1797) unfinished novella Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman substantiates the private operation of the madhouse where the protagonist Maria is confined. The importance of private ownership is that this places the madhouse outside the discourse of law. It is illegitimate yet it is legitimized as it is a symbol of male-dominated state oppression. Parallel to this Bastille becomes the direct symbol of the same repression which is used by Wollstonecraft to depict the predicament of dissenting revolutionary women in the late Eighteenth- century England. The language which she is using is evidently from the French Revolution as we know the symbolic importance of the dreaded tower of Bastille where political ‘criminals’ were imprisoned. So, Wollstonecraft’s objective is to politicize the genre of novel as the other Jacobin women writers- novel, for them, is a vehicle of political propaganda.
The objective of this paper is twofold. Firstly, to examine why Wollstonecraft felt this quest into the genre of novel for the politics which she already had discussed at length in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)? The second strand of inquiry will be into the domestic ideas of despotism which arise from gender discrimination perpetuated by the state machinery, with the legal system, in particular. This second strand will envelope the prevalent issues like the legally disadvantageous position of married as well as maternal women and how the revolutionary bodies of these mothers are confined along with infliction of mental harassment by both private and state systems. The issue of the imprisonm...
... middle of paper ...
...enstock. “The Missing Mother: The Meanings of Maternal Absence in the
Gothic Mode.” Modern Language Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1/2 (Spring - Autumn, 2003), pp.
25-43. JSTOR. 2 November 2008.
Todd, Janet. Reason and Sensibility in Mary Wollstonecraft's "The Wrongs of Woman."
Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 17-20. JSTOR. 2
November 2008.
Humphreys, A. R. “The ‘Rights of Woman’ in the Age of Reason.” The Modern Language
Review, Vol. 41, No. 3 (Jul., 1946), pp. 256-269. JSTOR. 2 November 2008.
Komisaruk, Adam. “The Privatization of Pleasure: ‘Crim. Con.’ in Wollstonecraft's Maria.”
Law and Literature, Vol. 16, No. 1 (Spring, 2004), pp. 33-63. JSTOR. 2 November 2008.
Born as a free woman in London, England Mary argued for education along with unjust laws for women that subjected them to a form of slavery. As the world around her at the time was facing a political breakthrough with the United States using idea’s formed by philosophers John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories in the social contract, to break free from England, she hoped the French Revolution would create an era of equality and reason. Wollstonecraft places her opinion that the condition of adult women is caused by the neglect of education for girls. Most of the essay is based on her argument for education of
Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. Rebel Without a Cause. Dir.
The Romantic principle of individualism was shaped by the notion of man’s natural goodness which is prevented through artificial structures such as hierarchy. A Vindication of the Rights of Women was a text written to challenge the existing social and gender stratifications which constrained an individual’s freedom. Endorsing Jacques Turgot’s presentation of his Six Edicts in 1776 which proposed the elimination of privilege amongst the nobles, Wollstonecraft expresses her disdain for entitlements such as money metaphorically in her denunciation “Birth, riches, and every extrinsic advantage that exalt a man above his fellows, without any mental exertion, sink him in reality below them” exploring the dangers of the suppression of individuality.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1792. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. New York: Penguin Books, 1992.
Women still need to break away from the cult of domesticity. Women, although having made strides to be more independent, are still more or less dependent on men. Society still perceives women to be just housewives or mothers, women are subjected to the same ideas to that in Wollstonecraft’s era. Although women are given more freedoms, such as education, and employment, they are still not on the same standing as men. The role of women has undoubtedly evolved, however, this evolution does not put women in the same standing as men. Society still believes that women are still better off being housewives and mothers. According to Martha J. Cutter society believes that no matter what splendid talents a women might have “she could not use it better than by being a wife and mother” (384). The cult of domesticity still has a grasp on women; women are still bound by the home. Women are still seen as mere servants by society. Society condemns women to the home; it forces them to become dependent on men for their existence. Women must emancipate themselves from the home; they must break the chain that binds them to the cult of domesticity. Women must shatter society’s preconception of them and move towards building their own image. The cult of domesticity must be erased from society in order for women to become free from the home. Cutter asserts that women must
Boundless limitations existed in society, which in turn caused inequality, a lack of freedom and inferiority to occur. Immanuel Kant (2016) explores and deconstructs the notion of enlightenment in ‘An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” by claiming that people with power cause fear in others, which has created a society that has restrictions and rules to control and ‘guide’ the general public. On the other hand, Mary Wollstonecraft (2016) highlights the inferior status that has been imposed upon women by those with power, which she further emphasizes in ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman’. Although, both authors have clearly demonstrated their perspectives on freedom, there is a dissimilar concept they both debate upon throughout their respective texts.
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman is a novel written by Mary Wollstonecraft about how women are suppressed from their rights due to the ideals of the European society. Women are so blindsided from the ideals of society that they are not aware of the condition they are in. The women in the civilization only care about perusing elegance and attractiveness instead of an education. This civilization is under arbitrary political power that desires women as slaves, who are confined in the home, and only care about their “natural” tendencies of being modest, chaste, and beautiful. These women are treated as inferior beings that are too vulnerable to justify their primary rights.
In this passage from A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft passionately describes the plight women face in an attempt to live a virtuous life. She finds that the overall presumption of society that women should only be striving for beauty it the main culprit hindering humanities forward movement towards “true virtue”. Along with the blaring passion resonating throughout the passage, the tone Wollstonecraft’s words elicits towards gender roles at the time is critical and negative. Wollstonecraft uses the rhetorical devices: similes, rhetorical appeals, and rhetorical questions, to strengthen her argument to reform the expectations set for 18th century women in the book A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.
The Romantic period was a time where individuals and groups challenged established societal classes epitomised through the late 18th Century French Revolution where the clergy and working class destabilised the 3-tier feudal system. Similar to the lower classes’ attitude, Wollstonecraft expresses her disdain for entitlements metaphorically in her denunciation “Birth, riches, and every extrinsic advantage that exalt a man above his fellows, without any mental exertion, sink him in reality below them”. Furthermore, Wollstonecraft explores the corruption of moral values amongst the upper classes through cumulative listing of her targets in “wretchedness that has flowed from hereditary honours, riches, and monarchy, that men of lively sensibility have almost uttered blasphemy”. To resolve upper class society’s moral degradation, Wollstonecraft idealistically demands individuality over conformity to rigid social structures metaphorically through “There must be more equality established in society as virtuous equality will not rest firmly even when founded on a rock, if one half of mankind be chained to its bottom by fate.” Wollstonecraft extends her condemnation of a hierarchical structure by explaining through her extended metaphor “his opinions have been so steeped in the vat consecrated by authority, that the faint spirit which the grape of his own vine yields cannot be distinguished” exploring how even the clergy are similarly confined by social stratification supportive of Rousseau’s declaration “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” (The Social Contract, 1762). Wollstonecraft’s personification in “Liberty is the mother of all virtue” alludes to the motto of the French Revolution: “Liberty, equality, fraternity” reinforcing Wollstonecraft’s idealistic hopes for an egalitarian society.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. “A Vindication of the Rights of Women with Structures on Political and Moral
In Mary Wollstonecraft’s The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria and Mary Robinson’s The Natural Daughter, women are subject to many hardships economically, simply because they are women. Women are not given sufficient opportunity, as men are, to pursue a living. Even if she is a woman of taste and morals, she may be treated as though she is a criminal and given no means to protect herself.
Mary Wollstonecraft was a self-educated, radical philosopher who wrote about liberation, and empowering women. She had a powerful voice on her views of the rights of women to get good education and career opportunities. She pioneered the debate for women’s rights inspiring many of the 19th and the 20th century’s writers and philosophers to fight for women’s rights, as well. She did not only criticize men for not giving women their rights, she also put a blame on women for being voiceless and subservient. Her life and, the surrounding events of her time, accompanied by the strong will of her, had surely affected the way she chose to live her life, and to form her own philosophies.
Wollstonecraft is considered, in many cases, to be the first feminist, but rather should be considered the first liberal feminist. There are two options as to why, frequently throughout her texts, she pities and occasionally vilifies women; either that, through socialisation into the rather patriarchal middle class life of the 1700s, she genuinely believed herself to be one of the only middle class women aware of her own suffering and have a desperate need to change it; or, as this analysis will henceforth assume, that she dulled down her more feminist ideas to compensate for her generally male
At the heart of Wollstonecraft’s work is a call for change in the treatment of women based on the political nature of the family unit, thus her work takes on a feminist aim. Feminism as a critical theory seeks to address and reform society’s structural inequalities between gender (Philips, 1998). As such, Wollstonecraft’s work (1792) is essentially an appeal to a major tenet of feminism: equal opportunity. Rather than socializing girls from birth to the pursuits of pleasuring men, Wollstonecraft fervently believed that women should be able to cultivate their rational faculties through education, just as men are. She condemns the arbitrary authority assigned to men within the household – however, her argument stops short there. In other words, she does not argue for a complete overhaul of a patriarchal society that penetrates every aspect of life – representation in government, career prospects, private property rights and ownership, the struggle of working class women, and so forth – but primarily for the dynamic between husband and wife
Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice, 5(2), 454-460.