Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Scarlet letter novel analysis
Scarlet letter novel analysis
Symbolism in The Scarlet Letter
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Scarlet letter novel analysis
In the novel: The Scarlet Pimpernel, written by Baroness Orczy, a couple must come together to face a villain who threatens French aristocrats. It is just after the French Revolution, and the common people have taken France for their own. The French aristocrats, who have just suffered a major loss are being executed; at least 100 innocent men, women, and children are sent to Madam Guillotine daily. The Scarlet Pimpernel, a reverse British Robin Hood saves many of these innocents, which then leads to a call for his capture, and his main hunter is the villain, Chauvelin. Sir Percy Blakeney and his wife, Lady Marguerite Blakeney must face this villain together as the identity of the Scarlet Pimpernel is revealed to be the loud, stupid, and yet …show more content…
quietly intelligent, Sir Percy. In the Scarlet Pimpernel, a prevalent theme of the story is family comes first. This theme is represented in the book many times, such as when Lady Blakeney betrays the Scarlet Pimpernel in order to save her brother, Armand, and when she travels many miles and suffers many losses in order to help her husband, Sir Percy. The author’s main message is this: one’s family is something that one can’t change, and one has protect them at all costs, because that is what family is for. This theme is first introduced when Marguerite betrays the Scarlet Pimpernel to Chauvelin in order to save her brother, Armand. Here, she explains the reason for her actions to Sir Percy. “Armand was all in all to me! We had no parents and brought one another up. He was my little father, and I his tiny mother; we loved one another so…. Percy! Armand is in deadly danger....(He) is hopelessly compromised...tomorrow, perhaps he will be arrested...after that the guillotine...oh! It is horrible...” (Orczy 127-128). Marguerite loved her brother so much that she was willing to do this horrible deed in order to save him, and it was probably one of the hardest, and yet, easiest things she had ever done. She didn’t know who the Scarlet Pimpernel was, so it was easy to make the sacrifice, because in her mind, her family comes first. Another similar case is when the Comte de Tournay’s family makes it to Britain without him. They are all happy to have made it, but also very upset having left him behind. Here, the Comtesse is speaking to Sir Andrew Ffoulkes and a few others after having just escaped from France. “But my husband, Monsieur...he is in such deadly peril - I would never have left him, only...there were my children...I was torn between my duty to him, and to them….But, oh! Now that I am here amongst you all - in this beautiful, free England - I think of him, flying for his life, hunted like a poor beast...in such peril...Ah! I should not have left him... I should not have left him!...” (Orczy 32-33). Even though most marriages in the upper class are arranged, one can see that the Comtesse does actually care about her husband. This might be because he is probably the only family she has left, besides her children, and she wants him to be safe, and family comes first. This theme is improved through two more scenes from the book.
Even though Percy was very upset with Marguerite for her heinous actions, he still promises to help her brother, because she cares about him. “Faith, Madame, since it distresses you....for Armand, I pray you have no fear. I pledge you my word that he shall be safe...” (Orczy 130). Percy is still willing to help Marguerite, even though he thinks that what she did was wrong, because family comes first. Furthermore, even though the Comte de Tournay wanted to escape to Britain, he made his family go first and leave without him. Again, the Comtesse is speaking of her husband to Sir Andrew Ffoulkes and a few others.“(My children)...refused to go without me...and you and your friends assured me so solemnly that my husband would be safe.” Once again, family comes first. The Comte was willing to make the sacrifice, because his family’s lives were more important to him than his own, just like any other …show more content…
parent. The end of this novel only proves that family comes first when the next two scenes are played out. When Marguerite decides to go after Percy, she does it because she realizes that she really does care about him, contrary to her prior beliefs. “How could she (Marguerite) imagine that a man who could love with so much intensity as Percy Blakeney...could be the brainless idiot he chose to appear (as)?...But there was no time now to go over the past. By her own blindness she had sinned; now she must repay, not by empty remorse, but by prompt and useful action” (Orczy 151). Another example is when Percy forgives Marguerite for everything she did, including getting the Marquis de St. Cyr executed, and for betraying him in order to save her brother. “Percy… if only you knew…” said Marguerite. “I do know, dear...everything,” he said. “I have naught to forgive, sweetheart; your heroism, your devotion, which I, alas! So little deserved, and you have more than atoned for that unfortunate episode at the ball” (Orczy 246). This final statement made by Sir Percy really ties the whole family theme together, because he didn't have to forgive Marguerite. But he did, because that is what family is for. As one can see, this theme of family can be found all over this novel, and it is rather hard to miss.
It can be seen when Lady Blakeney betrays the Scarlet Pimpernel in order to save her brother, Armand. Another example is when she travels many miles and suffers many losses in order to help her husband, Sir Percy. Remember that one’s family is something that one can’t change, and one has to protect them at all costs, because that is what family is for. During the reading of this amazing novel, the writer of this essay came to think of her own family, and wondering if she would do all of these selfless acts for them. The answer she came up with is: most likely, yes. Would the reader do the
same?
Little Girls in Pretty Boxes and The Scarlet Letter. Both authors persuade the reader to feel pain of the stories subject. In Little Girls in Pretty Boxes the author used pathos and interviewing to share the stories of these overly dedicated youth. Joan Ryan wrote to show how these young, talented, sophisticated women can hide the harsh reality of the sport. In her biography she listed the physical problems that these young girls go through. They have eating disorders, stunted growth, weakened bones, depression, low self esteem, debilitating and fatal injuries, and many sacrifice dropping out of school. Whereas the Scarlet Letter is a fictional drama that uses persuasion and storytelling to involve the reader. Nathaniel Hawthorne discusses
Hester is a youthful, beautiful, proud woman who has committed an awful sin and a scandal that changes her life in a major way. She commits adultery with a man known as Arthur Dimmesdale, leader of the local Puritan church and Hester’s minister. The adultery committed results in a baby girl named Pearl. This child she clutches to her chest is the proof of her sin. This behavior is unacceptable. Hester is sent to prison and then punished. Hester is the only one who gets punished for this horrendous act, because no one knows who the man is that Hester has this scandalous affair with. Hester’s sin is confessed, and she lives with two constant reminders of that sin: the scarlet letter itself, and Pearl, the child conceived with Dimmesdale. Her punishment is that she must stand upon a scaffold receiving public humiliation for several hours each day, wearing the scarlet letter “A” on her chest, represe...
The Scarlet Pimpernel is a novel about a rich English man saving many aristocrats from the fate of the guillotine which has been interpreted into many versions of movies. This action packed story takes place in France and England during 1792. In this story a man named Sir Percy Blakeney turns out to be the Scarlet Pimpernel. In the story there is the romance element between Percy and Marguerite. The two love each other, but when Sir Percy finds out that she had something to do with the Marquis de St Cyr and his family being killed their trust and love is not that strong in each other. In the end, both Marguerite and Sir Percy end up loving each again and they get away from the villain in the story, Chauvelin.
being a witch. This is a very evil thing in the eyes of the Puritans.
What exactly is this secondary community? Hawthorne creates this sort of secondary community that is always there and is able to express emotions that are the very opposite of what the Puritans show by using nature. “Nature personification, for Hawthorne, is an effective vehicle with which to bridge the gap between the community of humankind and the community of nature” (Daniel 3). Hester and Pearl are outcasts from the Puritan society due to Hester’s sin. She broke their rules of morality, and for this reason nature must be used as their peer. “Mother and daughter stood together in the same circle of seclusion from society” (Hawthorne 78) and so, it is nature who lends a hand and helps.
Many times we feel that our family is against us or no one else cares for us. We even feel there is favoritism or preferences in our family, especially among other siblings. Most of the time it is our immaturity or jealously within ourselves that leads us to these conclusions. Moreover if we neglect others for our own selfish reasons, or if we choose to see things only from our point of view we usually end up by ourselves, longing for the presence of our family. In Eudora Welty’s “Why I Live at the P.O.”, the main character Sister, cannot step outside of her own perspective and is unable to understand the reality of the events taking place around her, therefore making her an unreliable narrator.
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter is one of the most respected and admired novels of all time. Often criticized for lacking substance and using more elaborate camera work, freely adapted films usually do not follow the original plot line. Following this cliché, Roland Joffe’s version of The Scarlet Letter received an overwhelmingly negative reception. Unrealistic plots and actions are added to the films for added drama; for example, Hester is about to be killed up on the scaffold, when Algonquin members arrive and rescue her. After close analysis, it becomes evident of the amount of work that is put into each, but one must ask, why has the director adapted their own style of depicting the story? How has the story of Hester Prynne been modified? Regarding works, major differences and similarities between the characterization, visual imagery, symbolism, narration and plot, shows how free adaptation is the correct term used.
The respect that Elizabeth had for her husband she lost it all. The trust she had for her husband was not the same after. She felt like everything he said and told her was not the truth. She had trust issues after that. She felt like her family was torn apart that her life would never be the same after. After all the lies and heart break. But that should ...
Being strongly tied to a family, where you would risk death is one thing, but as in any family a person usually takes their anger and frustrations out on individual family members, as in this passage on page 24, lines 100-103:
Authors use character development to show how a person can change. Through a descriptive portrayal of a charter and their development they become real to the reader. A well-developed character stirs up emotions in the reader making for a powerful story. A person can change for better or worse and Nathaniel Hawthorne shows this thru the character development of Hester, Chillingworth, and Dimmesdale in The Scarlet Letter.
Throughout the novel, 'The Scarlet Letter,'; Nathaniel Hawthorne illustrates the themes with various dramatic colors. Of the array are the colors green and gold, where green symbolizes different aspects of nature such as tranquility, security, and gloominess, whereas gold represents all that pertains to luxuriance, serenity and goodness. In certain chapters, it seems as if one color is codependent with the other.
4. The Scarlet Letter was written and published in 1850. The novel was a product of the Transcendentalist and Romantic period.
In today’s society there are many forms of revenge. Revenge can destroy a person from the inside out. The quest for revenge can become so all consuming that a person can waste their life away and lose who they are in the process. This is demonstrated in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The Scarlet Letter, in one of it’s main characters Roger Chillingworth. Roger Chillingworth spends years attempting to take revenge on the characters Hester Prynn and Arthur Dimmesdale. When Chillingworth is crossed by Hester and Dimmesdale he feels so much anger and pain boiling up inside him that he must act out. The character Chillingworth in the novel The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne becomes the embodiment of evil because of the way he strives to demolish another human being’s life by seeking revenge.
In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen tells of the romantic exploits and drama of the Bennet family. Due to the prejudice of most of the characters, even the protagonist, Elizabeth Bennet, misunderstandings and problematic situations arise. It does not help the heroine that many antagonists stand in her way. The most prominent villain turns out to be George Wickham, a member of the militia of whom uses his good looks and seemingly good personality to lie and manipulate others, playing ignorant to the troubles he has created; he becomes a large contributor to Lizzy’s prejudice and the book’s overall concept of a judgmental society that favors certain characteristics of a person over others.
As for example in the novel when Mr. Darcy is talking badly about Elizabeth she over hears what he and his friend, Mr. Bingley, are saying about her but she does not stand up for herself. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen shows examples of how most marriages were not always for love but more as a formal agreement arranged by the two families. Marriage was seen as a holy matrimony for two people but living happily ever after together was not always included, for example in the novel Mr. Wickmen seemed like a blessing for the Bennet family, a young, good looking soldier, but he ended up being a nightmare for their daughter.... ...