Sent on a mission by their respective kings, both Ibn Fadlan and John of Plano Carpini gave us a look inside the culture, religion, and military prowess of the Viking Rus and the Mongols. Ibn Fadlans journey to the Bulgar king was not an easy one as he met with the Rus people near the Volga River. The same holds true for John, as he travels to the Mongols to learn much about them and their intentions behind their unprecedented military skills. The Viking Rus and the Mongols have similarities and difference in their culture, military conquest, and religion.
The Rus tribes are believed to be the descendant of the Vikings and slave (Fadlan, 387). They are gigantic in their physical appearances and are well known for their raid and trade throughout
…show more content…
their expansion. The Rus people are Scandinavians who later give their name to modern day Russia and is composed of todays, Denmark, Sweden and Norway. The Rus people not only have a gigantic appearance, but the way they wear their closes emulates a true warrior figure. “Every one carries an axe, a dagger, and a sword, and without these weapons they are never seen (Fadlan, 387).” The Viking Rus were also flamboyant. The women wear irons, copper, and gold chains on their necks based on the wealth of their husbands. According to Ibn Fadlan, the Rus people are also the “Filthiest race that God ever created.” He noticed that they do not wash their hands and clean up after themselves. As the Islamic religion value great hygiene control, Ibn Fadlan was highly disgust with the way they keep their hygiene because it contradicts with his religious value. The Viking Rus were great navigators and traders. The main reason that helped them to be a great navigator were there ability to make ships. There navigation skill also helped them in conquering many cities. As Fadlan puts it, there main reason for conquering is to find ground resources from the wealthiest cities. In addition, as the population increase the people needed an extra land to settle. When Ibn Fadlan get acquainted with the Rus people that first thing that draw his attention was the culture, appearance, and religious difference between the Rus people and his own. His description of the Rus people as gigantic tells us that he has never seen such people and he was amazed by them. Next, Fadlan harsh description on their hygiene is completely seen through his Islamic background. Another subject that drew attention to Fadlan was their rituals after they conquered a new land: As soon as their ships have reached the anchorage, everyone goes ashore, having at hand bread, meat, onions, milk, and strong drink, and betakes himself to a high, upright piece of wood, bearing the likeness of a human face…… he advances to the large wooden figure, prostrate himself before it, and thus address: ‘O my lord, I am come from far country, bringing with me so many girls……….’ This ritual highly contradicts with Fadlan, as he is monotheistic who believe in only one non-material God---Allah. The other major cultural difference that was seen by Fadlan was the burial ceremony of the Vikings.
In this case, Fadlan is seen narrating each and every step of the ceremony. In the Vikings culture, the burial ceremonies differ from social class to social class. If a slave has died, they leave him as he is until he becomes the food of dogs and birds of prey (Fadlan, 389). On the other hand if a chief has dies the ceremony is quite different. One of the different things that happen after the death of a rich man is, one of the chiefs girls will have to resigns herself to death. Although they are not forced, the girls can not change their mind after they have offered themselves to be cremated with their master. For Fadlan, the crimination and the self-sacrificing act gave Fadlan a strange viewpoint on the Vikings burial system that is different from his culture. ‘One of the Rus was at my side and I heard him speak to the interpreter, who was present. I asked the interpreter what he said. He answered, ‘He said, You Arabs are fools.’ ‘Why?’ I asked him. He said, ‘You take the people who are most dear to you and whom you honour most and put them into the ground where insects and worms devour them. We burn him in a moment, so that he enters paradise at once.’... These discrepancies between Fadlan’s culture to the Vikings shows how different and difficult it is to outsiders to understand the viewpoint of the people living in …show more content…
it. Unlike the Vikings, the Mongols were land conquers who uses horses for their conquest.
After their great leader—Genghis Khan, the Mongols were unstoppable in their military conquest. Starting there conquest in northern china and then to west conquering Turkestan, which was the great Muslim power, then to Russia, Mongols succeeded in all direction. As Christopher Dawson—a historian, put it, ‘Genghis Khan succeeded in destroying a larger portion of the human race than any modern expert in total warfare.’ It was after this conquest that John of Plano Carpini was sent on a mission to identify there intentions. After his arrival, he was able to observe Mongols living style. As an envoys John said that the Mongols had treated them better than other envoys (John, 416). When he arrived, John was able to see their custom of hospitality. The Mongols gave them a tent and a provision. In the next few days, John noticed the preparation for the enthronement of the Cuyuc. One remarkable things that John noticed was the way they change their cloth. “On the first day they were all clothed in white velvet, on the second in red, on the third they were all in blue velvet, and on the fourth a finest brocade (John, 417). In addition, he noticed their affection towards mare’s milk and drinks. In john’s cultural viewpoint this was something that he was not accustomed to. “…. They kept plying us with drinks to such extent that we could not possibly stand it, not being used to it…. (John,
417). Both the Vikings and the Mongols were viewed through the outsiders cultural and religious view point. In both cases, the Vikings and the Mongols conquers land for the same reason—to get ground resource. Both of their culture also influenced the culture of the original settlers. In places where there was less inhabitants—Greenland and Iceland the culture was directly transplanted while in places where local system was established—Eastern England the Scandinavian culture fused with the indigenous (Cunliffe, 397).
Rossabi, Morris. "Life in China Under Mongol Rule: Religion." The Mongols in World History | Asia
Both the Mongols and the Muslim Caliphates had similar beginnings. Each of these cultures rose from unexpected origins. The Muslim Caliphates and the Mongols share certain characteristics unexpected of such different cultures. The Caliphates relied on the Persians to govern their territories while Genghis Khan demanded complete and undisputed loyalty to himself from his followers. Yet, under both of these cultures trade flourished and people were organized into very specific groups with certain rights.
When the word “Mongol” is said I automatically think negative thoughts about uncultured, barbaric people who are horribly cruel and violent. That is only because I have only heard the word used to describe such a person. I have never really registered any initial information I have been taught about the subject pass the point of needing and having to know it. I felt quite incompetent on the subject and once I was given an assignment on the book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Age, I was very perplexed for two reasons. One I have to read an outside book for a class that already requires a substantial amount of time reading the text, and secondly I have to write a research paper in History. I got over it and read the book, which surprisingly enough interested me a great deal and allow me to see the Moguls for more than just a barbaric group of Neanderthals, but rather a group of purpose driven warriors with a common goal of unity and progression. Jack Weatherford’s work has given me insight on and swayed my opinion of the Mongols.
The Mongols were a tough, strong, and a fierce Asian group of people. Their reign
William of Rubruck, who was a Franciscan Monk, took upon a mission in hopes for promoting the conversion of Christianity to the Mongol peoples. Though his primary focus was the Nestorian Christians and their practices, he as well provides a unique portrayal with helpful information about the Mongol customs, their food and how they loved to drink, to religious practices and their surrounding daily life. His careful account recorded intimate encounters that provide readers how the Mongolian people reacted and interacted with European foreigners. For example we know some of the customs of the Nestorian Christians from Rubruck’s account, “ they prostrated themselves, with their foreheads touching the ground in the Nestorian fashion, and next touched all the images with the right hand, always kissing the hand after they had done so; and then they preferred the right hand to all those who stood round about in the church,” (Rubruck 189). From this example Rubruck’s provides a personal account that there were some Christians in Mongolia and how ...
Anne F. Broadbridge’s Kingship and Ideology in the Islamic and Mongol Worlds is comprised of the contrasting positions held on different ideologies in the Medieval Islamic world. She distinguishes the between attitudes held toward political rule in the Middle East and Central Asia, specifically examining the years from 1260 to 1405. Where the influence of the Islamic religion had been playing a major role in how rulers defined their sovereignty, Mongol invasions led to unsettling comparisons to be established in order to clarify a ruler’s purpose as an administrative leader. The primary difference addressed is the conflict between Mamluk Sultans and Mongol Khans, which led to an even greater sense of dissimilar forms of political legitimacy
The Mongols had an original idea for how their empire was set up. Obedience and supporting their own kind was most important to them. The Mongol warriors always listened to their superiors and the “leaders are to personally examine the troops… and to punish those lacking any necessary equipment” (document b). The discipline was not soft either “whoever gives food or clothing without permission of his captor is to be put to
Genghis Khan once said, “A leader can never be happy until his people are happy.” Genghis Khan claims that he truly cares about his people and wants to make them feel content otherwise he doesn't think he has fulfilled his duty. Before he ruled the fierce Mongols, they lived in the steppes northwest of China where the climate was harsh and the natural resources were limited. They lived a nomadic lifestyle in tents, called yurts. In the late 1100s, Genghis Khan began to build a strong army. By 1206, the Mongols were united under Genghis’ rule. The Mongols were civilized because they had well thought out battle tactics, an advanced economy, and they maintained law and order.
...y populations were put into action as siege experts, and even the cavalry was a mixture of Mongol and other nomadic groups.
The Mongols built an empire that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to the Baltic Sea. One of the richest parts of that empire was the land of the Rus - but how did the Mongols conquer it so quickly? This lesson examines how, as well as how the Mongols ruled their new territory.
This story can be summarized by dividing the story into three major sections that represent a genealogy of the Genghis Khan ancestors, the lifestyle of Genghis Khan and the story of Genghis son and Ogodei his successor. This piece of early time’s literature was translated and edited by Jack Weatherford and it was not released until 16th February, 2010. The piece of work restores early history’s most prominent figures to the positions they rightfully deserves. It clears the picture of the nomadic lifestyle of the Mongols and it is rich with information regarding the society of the Mongols in the 12th and the 13th centuries” (Kahn, 2005).
The Vikings were impressive international tradesmen of their time. In fact, one of the most prominent features of the Viking Age was the immense trade network that the Norse maintained, which stretched from Greenland in the west to Baghdad and central Asia in the east, and comprised virtually all of the communities who lived in between. Moreover, Northern Europe’s economy was renovated from an exchange system into a commercial trade economy. For the Vikings, trade was the principal focus of all their settlements. In fact, the Vikings passion for trade led to numerous enhancements of various civilizations. For example, the Vikings introduced concepts and goods that would not have been assessable for some civilizations, which possibly saved a
Vikings were warriors that were still culturally rich, inspiring warriors, and daring masters of the sea. Their obsession with ships help them achieve greatness with their amazing craftsmanship and how cunning the Vikings were. Their fighting strategies are not old in the weapons but also in their religion. The weapons why used played a big role in the viking reputation, but also symbolized how good or wealthy the Viking was. The conclusion to this paper is that Vikings were more than just barbarians but they were a great civilization that believes in multiple gods and goddesses but were fierce in battle.
Located in the province of Xianjing, the Uyghurs are isolated by massive mountains, deserts, Communist China, and extreme poverty. The Uyghurs are of Turkic origin, and were one of the 9 original tribes. One of these tribes, the Ottomans, sacked Constantinople in 1459, starting the rein of the Sultans for 400 years. The superpower carved a massive empire, from its roots in Turkey, to spread from the Russian steppes to the Alps to India, and stamping their name on history in blood. European history in the 1400‘s, 1500‘s, and 1600‘s centered on the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire and the Arabic people carved two massive empires in an extremely short time. They crushed the medieval christian kingdoms around Jerusalem, and quickly started attacking Christian kingdoms in Spain, Greece, and the Balkans. These conflicts between Muslims and Christians have been the longest and bloodiest in the history of the world, and still persist today. These Ottomans are, understandably, the most wel...
Cohat, Yves. The Vikings: Lords of the Seas. Trans. Ruth Daniel. New York: A Times Mirror Company, 1992. Print.