Victor's Code Of Ethics In Frankenstein

978 Words2 Pages

Frankenstein and the monster are complex beings with a multitude of flaws that drive their motivations and actions, but ultimately, the monster is the more deserving candidate for sympathy due to a variety of inconsiderate and inequitable behavior aimed at him throughout the book; the monster’s journey and his concluding fate stands as an example of the harmful effects of crossing ethical boundaries in the long-term pursuit of scientific advancement. The monster stands as an hapless victim of Victor’s selfish endeavors and decisions to fulfil his own objectives.

At the beginning of this novel, Victor reanimates the new creature, but doesn’t think of the repercussions of his actions and acts on poorly thought out decisions due to his superficial …show more content…

Victor does not follow any guidelines that a physician should follow when treating a patient; for instance, a physician should “be dedicated to providing competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights” (AMA). As mentioned above, Victor crosses a generally held ethical boundary of proper responsibility by his initial escape from the monster and carefree disregard of his actions and their effects on the creature, along with his surroundings and as anticipated, his unthinking actions don’t pass without consequences. Victor had probably realized the society in general wouldn't accept his creation, as he himself has done, and that the outside world would be a significant danger to the monster. Moreover, he doesn't show any form of “respect” for the monster as an individual and instead, spends a majority the time thinking about how the monster was being a nefarious nuisance to his personal life and proceeded to deny repeated attempts of mutual connection and companionship from the monster. This is shown when the monster actually tries to communicate and interact with his creator when he first wakes up, only to be rejected: “His jaws opened, and he muttered some inarticulate sounds” (Shelley 49). Victor’s mentality is extremely unfair and reprehensible and holds him somewhat accountable for the ensuing repulsion and …show more content…

The enticement of these scientific practices repeatedly trump any of Victor’s good conscience and results in the wide range of prejudiced behaviour that is unfairly directed towards the monster. A similar mindset can be witnessed by the researchers and doctors in “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, who tested cancer related tests on the uninformed prisoners in the Ohio Penitentiary, ignored the risks that these tests may pose. The prisoners were convinced that they “deserved” these tests done on them, as they had harmed others in the past and the researchers knew full well that these tests had the potential for great harm, but didn’t get informed consent due to “any unnecessary fear” (Skloot 130). Additionally, this novel also mentions the Nuremberg Trials, a series of war tribunals centering on “conducting unthinkable research on Jews without consent” (Skloot 131), which had gathered historical significance due to it setting up the ethical code called the Nuremberg code. The advent of these laws illustrate how far humans have gone to gain more knowledge in the field of medicine and relates to the overall theme of Frankenstein, as they both emphasize the odious implications of rapidly advancing science. The monster’s and Victor’s situation is similar to that of the helpless Nuremberg

Open Document