Victor's Actions In Frankenstein

668 Words2 Pages

Actions can create evil as well as preserve good as shown in Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein. The creature states many times how Victor abandoned him during his creation. He quotes, “I was benevolent; my soul glowed with love and humanity: but am I not alone, miserably alone? You, my creator, abhor me; what hope can I gather from your fellow-creatures, who owe me nothing? they spurn to hate me” (Shelley 89). However, were the actions the creature made against Victor, reasonable? No, the creature's actions were not reasonable, and in fact they were evil! The first reason why the creature’s actions are not justifiable, is the fact that the creature basically killed all of Victor’s family; except for Ernest who really isn’t a big part of the story. The creature ends up physically killing three people and those actions end up killing three more, including Victor. The creature did start out with some compassion, examples of this would be when he helped out the poor people, living in a cottage, with their chores. He also attempted to save a girl from …show more content…

Victor was really the only one involved in this whole ordeal. However, the creature took it out his family on friends. The reason for doing this is very clear, he wanted to make Victor suffer as much as possible. The fact that he hurt many people not involved, people who had no idea this was going on, shows evil. One of the few things in the creature's defense is that he did own up to what he did. I have murdered the lovely and the helpless; I have strangled the innocent as they slept, and grasped to death his throat who never injured me or any other living thing. I have devoted my creator, the select specimen of all that is worthy of love and admiration among men, to misery…” (Shelley 196). But by then it was far too late and everyone was already dead. He should've noticed this

Open Document