Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reactions and criticisms of the novel Les miserables
Themes around victor hugo life and work and why
Reactions and criticisms of the novel Les miserables
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reactions and criticisms of the novel Les miserables
Writers often use their writing to manipulate their audience through certain language techniques that make the intended reader more open. French writer, Victor Hugo is best known as the author The Hunchback of Notre Dame and Les Miserables. However, in the mid-1800s, Emperor Napoleon III banished Hugo for his works that express criticism of the Emperor and his control. Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s canny and urging letter to the Emperor Napoleon III uses juxtaposition, flattery, and pathos to convince the Emperor to pardon Victor Hugo. To begin with, the use of juxtaposition, appeals to Napoleon’s beliefs by displaying Browning’s perspective in a light that Napoleon can agree with. Additionally, juxtaposition makes Browning seem submissive …show more content…
Because the audience is specific to the Emperor, Browning carefully tailors her argument to Napoleon's beliefs and morals. She brings up God in another attempt to compare Napoleon to the religious deity, “Make an exception of him as God made an exception of him when He gave him genius...” (Browning 56-57). This comparison of God makes Napoleon seem like an idol to Browning, encouraging Napoleon to continue actions that mirrors God. Continuing the comparison of Napoleon to God, Browning instills in the emperor the idea of “turning the other cheek” by forgiving him and “disproving him with your [his] generosity”.While religion was the target of this emotional response, Browning also connects her argument to the son of Napoleon, that his son would think him “great” to forgive Hugo with “magnanimity” (44-45). Because the emperor is a parent, Browning then connects this to the parenthood of Victory Hugo, requesting that Napoleon allows Hugo to return to his “daughter's grave” (59). Appealing to the Emperor's religion and love for his children, Browning thoroughly makes her case, urging Napoleon to allow Hugo home. By using Napoleon's son to elicit emotion, Browning makes the case that the Emperor would be a better father if he pardoned Victor
Elizabeth Barrett Browning uses great rhetoric throughout her letter to Napoleon III to convey her position on the matter of the banishment of Victor Hugo. Browning uses many rhetorical strategies in the letter. Some of her strongest points in the argument are her ethos, tropes and schemes, and pathos.
In 1851, Victor Hugo, a french writer, was exiled from France for writings that were deemed critical by the government by Napoleon. Many believed the exiling was unjust and expressed their views strongly, through opinionated letters, which revealed people’s stances on Hugo’s exile. Although some agreed and other disagreed, one thing they all had in common was the persuasive use of rhetorical strategies. Elizabeth Barrett Browning, an English poet, wrote a letter to Napoleon in 1857, but never mailed it. Browning’s letter incorporated strong word choice, repetition, and an appeal to emotion which overall was used to persuade Napoleon to pardon Hugo would benefit him and his people.
“A person’s a person, no matter how small.” This lovely quote was spoken by a brilliant mind we all know today as the children’s book writer, Dr. Seuss. When someone mentions his name, we all immediately think, “Oh! The children's book writer!” but what we fail to recognize is that Seuss was shaping the minds of us and millions of other children to find the best in people, be a better person and to agree with equality.
Obviously, based on these observations, the two men of Browning’s monologues are very similar in some ways but vastly different in others. They both attempted to find a way to make their women immortal by keeping them around. However, one did it as a possession, and the other wasn’t even planned at all beforehand, it just happened. Based on this, the second of the two guys is most definitely the more messed up of the two men.
...s with his request to remove it. Hawthorne and Browning chose two different developments and extremes of their works. Hawthorne chose to be subtler with his approach to the control in Aylmer and Georgiana’s marriage. On the other hand, Browning chose a more harsh approach to the control between the Duke and his last Duchess. Regardless of the approach, both authors came up with a similar theme which was power and control.
We live in a time of laziness and choosing an uneducated TV show over a book containing precious knowledge. In Ray Bradbury's book Fahrenheit 451, we witness a world where books are banned and people are encouraged to sit all day and watch television. The smart ones that read books live in a life of fear since firemen in this world are commanded to burn the houses of anyone that owns a book. Our society isn't at that point yet but a large group of our society are showing strong similarities toward the people in Fahrenheit 451 that sat around all day. This is also encouraged by everyone wanting to be “In the know” so they decide to watch TV all day. The book Fahrenheit 451 is a warning to our society that if we do not stay educated we will ultimately
...her temptation had accomplished this; therefore her cruel effect must have been fate. As she awaited death, one character noticed the incidence of destiny when she remarked that “‘God has it all written down in His book'” (182). One aspect of Victor Hugo's work, his revelations of themes, philosophies, and morals through humorous characters, seems reminiscent of Sir Walter Scott's usage of a comparable pretext. Through the philosopher/poet, Gringoire, Hugo presents a moral that “‘the temptations of the flesh are pernicious and malignant'” (276). Certainly there exists some truth to this supposition on a central idea of the novel, the animosity stirred by mortal sensitivity, that during man's eternal search for affection--even when he possesses it, he still craves more.
Taplin said a little something about her desire, “In the face of her desire to make her contemporaries think and act in response to the pressing problems of her day, Barrett Browning's use of passionate feeling, religion, and other aspects of sentimentality seems entirely appropriate”. What Taplin was basically saying was that Browning wrote about things that was going on in her everyday life, but the fact that people back then was just about going through the same thing that she was going through at that time
Everyone Is A Monster In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley uses emotional intensity and nature as refuge as her main focus. She tells us that nobody is born a monster, it is society's personal view that makes you who you are. The Monster has been on his own ever since the beginning. He tries to be a good civilized person more than once and fails. Victor shows us what all society will think of him right at the beginning of the chapter.
In essence, Elizabeth Barrett Browning dramatic monologue proved a powerful medium for Barrett Browning. Taking her need to produce a public poem about slavery to her own developing poetics, Barrett Browning include rape and infanticide into the slave’s denunciation of patriarchy. She felt bound by women’s silence concerning their bodies and the belief that “ a man’s private life was beyond the pale of political scrutiny” (Cooper, 46).
The Sinister Duke in Robert Browning's My Last Duchess. In Robert Browning's "My Last Duchess," a portrait of the egocentric and power-loving Duke of Ferrara is painted for us. Although the duke's monologue appears on the surface to be about his late wife, a close reading will show that the mention of his last duchess is merely a side note in his self-important speech. Browning uses the dramatic monologue form very skillfully to show us the controlling, jealous, and arrogant traits the duke possessed without ever mentioning them explicitly.
Through the appearance of jealousy, the Duke tries to hide his actual inner struggle of insecurity. The Duke may have that feeling, possibly because of his appearance and how the Duchess usurpers him in that category. This results, in the Duke poisoning the Duchess, because the Duke comes to the conclusion that possibly someday she would grow tired of him and have an affair. So not only did he murder her but in doing so he made sure she could only be with him, thus sealing her fate. For this reason, the Duke clearly thinks of himself as a self-justifier who is attempting to cover up his feelings and actions by getting rid of her. The quote references his insecurity which therefore is a fuel for his jealousy. Michael G. Miller states in his essay, “Browning’s My Last Duchess”, “His subtle and unconscious slander of his last victim exposes at the bottom an instinctive self-justifier or at least a man
In "My Last Duchess", by Robert Browning, the character of Duke is portrayed as having controlling, jealous, and arrogant traits. These traits are not all mentioned verbally, but mainly through his actions. In the beginning of the poem the painting of the Dukes wife is introduced to us: "That's my last Duchess painted on the wall,/ looking as of she were still alive" (1-2). These lines leave us with the suspicion that the Duchess is no longer alive, but at this point were are not totally sure. In this essay I will discuss the Dukes controlling, jealous and arrogant traits he possesses through out the poem.
Elizabeth Barrett Browning was one of the braver literary pioneers. Choosing to utilize the vocabulary she favored rather than submit to the harsh criticisms of those who held the power to make or break her is an applaudable novelty about her. Many writers, having been successful in their literary exploits, are susceptible to accusations that their work was catered to critics. Surely, this cannot and should not be said of Elizabeth Barrett Browning.
Shaviro, Steven. "Browning upon Caliban upon Setebos." Browning Society Notes 12 (1983). Rpt. in Robert Browning: Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom, N.Y.: Chelsea House Publishers, 1985. 139-150.