Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Victimization in criminology
Role of courts in the criminal justice system
Criminal justice quizlett
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Victimization in criminology
Victim means an individual who are likely to suffer serious physical injury, psychological harm, financial loss, emotional harm or property damage due to the action of alleged commission of an offence. Most of crime such as sexual assault or physical assault committed by either family members or acquainted. Before 1980, the court and justice system officials were reluctant to identify the rights of the accused or the victim because of lack of the consultation, information, and lack of trust in the system. The courts or legislators focused less on victim injury or condition. Victims may be subjected to insensitive questioning by the police as they have somehow at fault in the offence. Victims rarely report incident to the police due to embarrassment or questioned by the police. After the initial pain of the crime, victims can be made feel worse by the actions of criminal justice system by postponed their case or dismissed and lose wages because of time spent testifying in court. Victim may be fearful of testifying in court due to low faith in the justice system or being embarrassed by defence attorney. Victims’ suffering does not end with the offender act; they may suffer more victimization at the hands of the justice system. …show more content…
Victims rarely report the incident to the police due to fear and lack of trust in the criminal justice system. As in case of the People vs. Turner, the judge gave six month jail sentence for committing three counts of felony sexual assault. Judge mentioned that Turner already suffered from the media attention and gave him six months jail sentence. Case like the People vs. Turner undermines the public confidence in the criminal justice system. Public have less faith in the criminal justice system and feel that the criminal justice system is too lenient on the
2. Did you easily find the National Criminal Justice Reference Service when you searched for NCJRS on the search tools?
In Canada, crime is measured using a combination of both police and victim-reported information. Statistics Canada presents surveys to criminologists to analyze the data of criminalization and victimization to determine understand criminal behaviour, how the public perceives it, and how to prevent it. Uniform Crime Reporting Survey (UCR) intended to standardize the collection of police-reported crime statistics from across Canada. Figures generated by UCR are less than perfect, due to variations in the grey lines of recording and interpreting crime between different police. (Cartwright, 2015) The General Social Survey (GSS) was implemented later as a broad social survey to poll for crimes not reported to police. This was because Statistics
Generally, the study of crime mainly focused on the offender until quite recently. In fact, Shapland et al (1985) described the victim as ‘the forgotten man’ of the criminal justice system and ‘the non-person in the eyes of the professional participants’. A new perspective was brought with victimology, an expanding sub-discipline of crimin...
The criminal justice system is dynamic and has changed rapidly since the works of Cesare Beccaria and Cesare Lombroso during Enlightenment Period and this reflects in the issue of intersectionality with the changing approaches taken towards concepts of gender, race and class. Sexual assault will be a predominate study used throughout the essay to examine the different approaches and issues between traditional and non-traditional justices. This essay will first establish where are these intersectionalities found in terms of sexual assault cases and the challenges victims face in the legal process with traditional approaches then followed by a comparison to the transition towards non-traditional alternative justice system has responded with a deeper insight into restorative justices and its effects on resolving these challenges. The role of alternative justice and the key challenges in disproportionate crimes are also important aspects of intersectionality in Australia as they aim to resolve challenges women and the mentally disabled encounter during processing through court in the criminal justice system.
I take into consideration that instead of authorizing the state or professional to ratify and speak their mind, the most relevance to a case the court should take into consideration of what the victim seems fit as a fair punishment or payment in forms of restitution, whether it is labor or monetary to then go along with the judge 's sentence. “The Charter, apart from other things, sets forth that the victim should enjoy the same rights as the culprit. But it is not enough to put this in writing, the law has to be changed in such a way that the victim is not only not deprived of his say, but has rights at least equal to those enjoyed by the accused”. I agree with the previous quote due to the fact that victims should not be deprived from speech and equality. I believe that by having the original parties engaged rather than being driven to the side, society will be more concerned to make sure that everyone is given fair, equal and consistent resolution to a conflict. This would establish that the neighbourhood and state have a set of shared values and goals that they are working towards to support social order. “At present, the role of a victim of a crime is only at the periphery of the criminal justice delivery system. Once the first information is furnished, the only stage at which the victim comes into the picture is when she is called upon to give evidence in court by the prosecution. The victim virtually
The criminal justice systems vary in each country as far as their policies and procedures go. Each aspect of the criminal justice system has its advantages and disadvantages. The main purpose of the criminal justice system is to sanction criminals, mitigate crime, increase security and uphold a fair system of justice. In some cultures, fairness is not always given as certain laws are expected to be honored. This paper will discuss the criminal justice system in the United States, England and Japan.
Victimization is what happens to a person as when another person deliberately harms them, assaults them physically, sexually or even mentally as well as if they purposely took their possessions or property without the other persons consent. People are victimized every day and all over the world. Violent acts happen to everyday people in their homes, at their work places or just about anywhere. These horrific acts are brought to our attention by the several different types of media outlets. But there are people who are subject to this type of violence that we do not hear about and they are inmates in our correctional facilities.
This research paper will be used to acknowledge the trending factor in our criminal justice system of wrongful convictions. Wrongful convictions socially can be defined as convicting the innocent and punishing the not guilty. In other words, wrongful convictions play a huge part of our flawed Criminal Justice system. In order to fix and come up with a solution, we will have to first come to basis of first understanding the issue, then using this information to gain ideas to which we can apply to access better results to the issue of wrongful convictions. Once we come up with a reasonable solution to this problem then we can conclude that the data will show an eminent decrease in this trend. The causes of wrongful convictions include the “Snitch” Testimony, Eyewitness misidentification, false confessions and much more that I will add during the readings of this paper.
The criminal justice system is composed of three parts – Police, Courts and Corrections – and all three work together to protect an individual’s rights and the rights of society to live without fear of being a victim of crime. According to merriam-webster.com, crime is defined as “an act that is forbidden or omission of a duty that is commanded by public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law.” When all the three parts work together, it makes the criminal justice system function like a well tuned machine.
The criminal justice system views any crime as a crime committed against the state and places much emphasis on retribution and paying back to the community, through time, fines or community work. Historically punishment has been a very public affair, which was once a key aspect of the punishment process, through the use of the stocks, dunking chair, pillory, and hangman’s noose, although in today’s society punishment has become a lot more private (Newburn, 2007). However it has been argued that although the debt against the state has been paid, the victim of the crime has been left with no legal input to seek adequate retribution from the offender, leaving the victim perhaps feeling unsatisfied with the criminal justice process.
The idea of victim-oriented crime prevention holds that the majority of victimisation that occurs centres around a relatively small percentage of the population and that targeting crime prevention efforts and policy at potential or prior victims can prevent a large quantity of crime (Riley and Mayher 1980). In Garland’s (2001) investigation he observed that a reduced public confidence in the criminal justice system and its capability to reduce crime has led to victim treatment as playing a more important role in creating reform. In considering victims during criminal processes and law-making, the standard of efficiency in our system has been critically analysed and led to changes in a variety of areas. The development of official definitions of what constitutes victimhood and increased recognition of victims has helped legitimise and validate the criminal justice system.
A victimless crime is a consensual illegal act lacking any complaining parties. No one is directly harmed, or if harm occurs, it is negated by the informed consent of willing participants. It has been suggested however the actual is indirect and can take on various forms. But that since the targeted individual consented to participate in one of these acts, the attribution of victimization is no longer considered. Victimless crimes may include: public drunkenness; vagrancy; various sexual acts that usually involve consenting adults (fornication, adultery, incest, homosexuality, and prostitution); obscenity; pornography; drug offenses; abortion; gambling; and juvenile status offenses (offenses that would not be criminal if the actor were an adult).
Understanding the theories of victimology is important to understand the victims, we need to understand the four main theories of victimization. These theories are the principals of victim assessment. It will give the officer the tools to understand the motive behind the victimization giving him different types of views to analyze the victim. The four main theories of victimization are: Victim Precipitation, Lifestyle, Deviant Place, and Routine Activity. These four theories according to victimology give us the idea of how the victim become to be a victim. The word Victimization meanings “an act that exploits or victimizes someone” and “adversity resulting from being made a victim” (Vocabulary.com. Dictionary Victimization (2017)). By understanding the victim and the influences of their social life is important so we can give the victim the treatment and
There are many forms of victimization which include, stalking, robbery, domestic violence, rape, sexual misconduct, assault, sexual harassment, and various others. Some individual risk factors include, young age, prior victimization, low education level, employment status (citation). The scenario reviewed for this assignment discusses an 8-year-old girl that has been victimized by her father. Evelyn lives at home with both her parents and one younger sibling, her family relocated recently to a new home at father insistence (Laureate Education, 2012). The main influence for Evelyn’s victimization is the victim offender relationship. The family relationship between victim and offender is that of a parental figure and their child. This relationship
Precipitating factor can be defined as the extent to which an individual who has been victimised is responsible for that to happen, that is to what extent he or she has played a role to become a victim. While facilitating factors can be explained as when a person by his own negligence fail to take necessary measures and inadvertently make themselves an easy prey to criminals. Anyone be it in Mauritius or around the world can become a victim of crime by either these two ways. However it may also happen that these two factors overlap and both these factors are responsible for victimisation to happen.