The Courts System: The Role Of The Court System

This essay will define the role of the courts system provide some history of the courts highlight the various types of courts.with outline of civil and criminal courts and supreme courts. Pages to follow will establish the jurisdiction and hierarchy. Evalutate the advantages and disadvantages of using The jury system. With final piece to provide a conclusion

The role of the courts are to administer the law, which has had much history over centuries going back as far as Anglo-Saxon period. When local issue where decided by local customs laws. The word court brought about when justice decided by the king’s court or also known as royal court and punishments dealt with in different excessively In 1873, Parliament passed the judicature Act,

The aim of this essay, identify the role of the tribunal system and discuss the impact that any reforms may have had on the system.

The tribunal system in the United kingdoms is part of the national system of administrative justice with tribunals classed as non-departmental public bodies The courts structure covers England and Wales; the tribunals system covers England, Wales, and in some cases Northern Ireland. And tribunals system has its structure for dealing with cases and appeals, but decisions from different chambers of the Upper Tribunal and the Employment Appeals Tribunal may also go to the Court of Appeal. Scotland

Framework Document for Her Majesty 's Courts and Tribunals Service says its aim is "to run an efficient and effective courts and tribunals system, which enables the rule of law to be upheld and provides access to justice for all."The tribunal system of the United Kingdom is part of the national system., from 2007 reforms were put in place to build a unified system. with recognised judicial authority, routes of appeal and regulatory

The Lord Chancellor’s Department made its enquiries as to the most eligible candidates. Is considered that the appointment process was open to the criticism that a member of the government should not have the sole responsibility for appointing judges. It was also found that judges were nominated in the image of existing judges rather than solely on merit from a pool of widely drawn eligible candidates.

Despite the criticisms levelled at it, the former method of appointment in fact worked rather well. Candidates selected on merit, there was no question of any political consideration being involved, and Lord Chancellor usually acted on the advice of the senior judiciary, who were in a position to identify able practitioners. Selection was, however as critics pointed out, from a rather narrow pool, and this did nothing for the diversity of the judiciary.

It was considered that, while judges should be appointed on merit, if we are to have a judiciary that has the confidence of citizens, it must fairly reflect all sections of society that are in a position to provide candidates of the requisite ability. The new system of selection seeks to encourage such candidates to come forward. Open competition makes all appointments. The Commission recommends candidates