Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics and professionalism in law enforcement
The impact of domestic violence in society
Ethics and professionalism in law enforcement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics and professionalism in law enforcement
then listening to the girlfriend trying to get the victim to “stay with her” as the victim was gasping and gurgling. It was horrifying, but very interesting to me as well. The defendant ran off and was later caught in a high-speed chase in Savannah. His defense is trying to say it was self-defense because she came after him, honestly I can’t believe they are going with this because on the audio recording she was telling him to leave for about 15 minutes, then she said “what are you doing, what do you have in your pocket?” Then screams, there was no tussling or physical sounds heard, just voices. After opening statements there were many witnesses called, the director of the Victim Witness program in Fulton County, the Chief Medical Examiner …show more content…
I won’t lie, I cried a bit during the prosecutors closing statement. The prosecutor started out with a replay of the audio tape of the killing, the family of the victim broke down as the victims screams before and after she was shot echoed in the courtroom. I heard so much more detail in the audio tape than I heard the first time and it is haunting me, the gurgling of blood as she tried to breathe, the victims friend wailing for her to not leave her. I feel messed up about this case, maybe it was too much for me? Regardless, the prosecutor ended his statements with large pictures of the 3 little boys who are now motherless, it was powerful and my heart sank for the little boys. The defense attorney did a good job with his statement considering, in my mind, the case was a slam dunk. I keep thinking about the little boys that are now living with the victim’s sister. What type of damage was done to them? I wrote a list of things that I noted throughout this case in regards to the kids: they had to endure their mother’s relationship with this man that was twice their mother’s age, who was in and out of jail, who moved them all over the southern states, they never seemed to have a stable living situation, their mother broke away from him and now their only father figure (good or bad) was gone, they then have a new random …show more content…
I will be sad when I don’t get to walk through the doors with my “VIP” badge anymore. Yesterday I was able to sit in on the verdict and sentencing phase of the murder trial last week. The jury deliberated for over 4 hours, there were 12 charges stacked against the defendant, malice murder, felony murder, aggravated stalking, family violence battery, child deprivation, the list goes on. To make a long story short (for once), the defendant was found guilty and ultimately the judge sentenced him to life in prison without parole. I was relieved that this guy will pay for what he did, he did not show any emotion when the verdict and sentencing was read, I’m assuming he knew what was coming. I met a super nice advocate this week named Margaret, my interns had her before me and I heard horror stories, however I really enjoyed helping her! I made a bunch of copies for her of her victim follow up surveys the D.A.’s office sends out then I put the letters in envelopes, she said I only had to do 50 or so, but I did the whole 100 for her anyways. We chatted at her desk for a while as she explained that she had nothing more for me to do. We talked about careers and I listened to her experience as she is quite a bit older than me. I explained that I would love to work in a school district setting until my children are a bit older and she told me she used to substitute teach at the Marietta School
They found Casey Anthony, who was charged with first degree murder of her 3-year-old, not guilty. While she was not guilty of murder, she was convicted on counts four through seven for false information given to the police. The judge sentenced her to one year in county jail for each one of the four counts, but she was released 10 days after she received 1043 days credit. If I was part of the jury I would have said she was guilty of murdering her daughter. Even if she did not kill her, she is still part of the reason why she died. Casey neglected her child either way and did not report the crime to the police until someone else did. I am shocked that the visual evidence did not convince the jury that she was guilty. From the strand of hair in the trunk that matched the past child’s hair, to the extensive research on chloroform found on all web browsers, it was very evident that she did or was at least part of murdering her
The defendant of the Casey Anthony Trial, is Casey Anthony. At the age of 19 she had given birth to her daughter Caylee Marie Anthony, the victim in this case. The one who first noticed the 2 year old daughter missing were her grandparents, Cindy and George Anthony. Casey was found a month after she left her parents house, with her boyfriend Tony Lazzaro. It was then that Casey had told the police about how her daughter was missing for about a month because the babysitter, Zenaida “Zanny the Nanny” Fernandez-Gonzalez had kidnapped her. These were the main people who started off the investigation on Casey Anthony.
Throughout, we have heard from the victims’ family. I would like to now offer in my behalf and on the behalf of my fellow jurors in the case our utmost sympathies for the respective families of the two victims on the loss of Mr. Stephan Swan and Mr. Mathew Butler and commend them for their bravery throughout this ordeal, which I could only imagine is a hard one. I urge all the victims’ families
In July of 2008, one of the biggest crime cases devastated the United States nation-wide. The death of Caylee Anthony, a two year old baby, became the most popular topic in a brief amount of time. Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony, became the main suspect after the child supposedly was kidnapped and went missing. To this day, the Casey Anthony case shocks me because justice, in my opinion, wasn’t served. I feel as if the criminal conviction system became somewhat corrupted in this case. The entire nation, including the court system, knew that Casey Anthony was behind this criminal act, but yet she escaped all charges. I chose this case not only because it’s debatable, but also to help state the obvious, this case was handled the wrong way. Clearly the legal system was biased, which worked in Casey Anthony’s favor, freeing a murderer.
Most people don 't look at every aspect of a crime. They don 't think about everyone that was affected, other than the victim. In her article "On Punishment and Teen Killers", Jennifer Jenkins explains how her younger sister was taken from her by a murderer who shot and killed her. In her article she states, "So few who work on the juvenile offender side can truly understand what the victims of their crimes sometimes go through. Some never recover." Jenkins is explaining her personal experience of losing her younger sister to help others understand what the families of the victim have to deal with for the rest of their lives. She brings a point of view that most people have never been in because they 've never experienced what it 's like to have a loved one taken away from you by murder. In her story she also states, "If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world." Many people believe that the supreme court needs to be more lenient on juveniles because their brain is not fully developed as that of an adult, but brain development cannot be used as an excuse because as Jenkins explains, the teens would be killing at the same rate all over the world. Jenkins also brings up a good point about how the US as a whole needs to step up to prevent these crimes from happening. Jenkins states, "We in America have to own to this particular problem, with weapons so easily available to our youth, and the violence-loving culture we raise them. She is trying to bring awareness to society that America is also at fault for these crimes. Furthermore, she also explains why life sentencing is not as cruel as some may feel it is when she says, "… a life sentencing still allows a great deal of good living to be done, even from behind bars, far more than these teen killers gave to our murdered love
If a family member was murdered, a family member was murdered, age should not dictate if the punishment for homicide will be more lenient or not. If anyone not just juveniles has the capabilities to take someone's life and does so knowing the repercussions, they should be convicted as an adult. In the case of Jennifer Bishop Jenkins who lost her sister, the husband and their unborn child, is a strong advocate of juveniles being sentenced to life without parole. In her article “Jennifer Bishop Jenkins On Punishment and Teen Killers” she shows the world the other side of the spectrum, how it is to be the victim of a juvenile in a changing society where people are fighting against life sentences for juveniles. As she states in the article “There are no words adequate to describe what this kind of traumatic loss does to a victims family. So few who work on the juvenile offender side can truly understand what the victims of their crimes sometimes go through. Some never
After reading this story, I most certainly do believe that it is possible for crimes just as terrible as this one to occur without justice being found. There isn’t any way to guarantee that all crime scenes ever will be uncontaminated and sometimes the issues with the crime scene cane make the evidence there unable to be used, which will strongly hinder a case, just like in this case with Jonbenét Ramsey. I don’t think it is selling out the rights of the victim because as humans there is only so much that we are able to
During the identification and prosecution of a suspect, eyewitnesses are the most important. Eyewitness testimony needs to be reliable as it can have serious implications to the perceived guilt or innocence of a defendant. Unfortunately, the reliability of eyewitness testimony is questionable because there is a high number of eyewitness misidentification. Rattner (1988) studied 205 cases and concluded that eyewitness misidentification was the factor most often associated with wrongful conviction (52%). Eyewitness testimony can be affected by many factors. A substantial literature demonstrates own group biases in eyewitness testimony. For example, the own-race bias, in which people are better at recognizing faces of their own race versus another
Wayne Williams’ case was heartbreaking but it was an interesting case that could have had more justice for all the victims and their families. The judge should have thrown in all of the other murders in
I hope that through this experience I can grow my understanding of the legal system and its affects on others. I feel as though working diligently with those who are in dire need of legal help will advance me in the path of law at a rapid pace. Being immersed with people who have
Many people who are against capital punishment are only thinking of the criminal and how cruel it is for them. But, shouldn't we think of the families that are broken apart now because of the merciless acts of these criminals. Think of Susan Smith, how she knowingly drove her car off into a lake with her two children strapped to the seats. Think of how they must have felt as the cold water started to fill the cabin of the car, and then ultimately drown them. Barbaric is exactly the word I would use to describe her actions. But yet, the jury rejected the death penalty and chose a life sentence instead. Mr. Smith, the father of the two children, broken up from the ruling said "Me and my family are disappointed that the death penalty was not the verdict, but it wasn't our choice. They returned a verdict they thought w...
The theme of the first semester of my senior year at Bryn Mawr College, although I have lacked any gender coursework in my first three years of semesters, unexpectedly heavily involves the collision of the science, literature, and politics of gender. As my most last minute, haphazard schedule of any semester ever, on the next to last day of the shopping week period, I found myself adding two gender studies classes to my schedule. One entitled Advanced Topics in Developmental Psychology for my Psychology minor, and the other entitled, Interdisciplinary Perspectives of Sex and Gender. Both classes, although very different in their methodology - (one placing a profound importance on precision, cautious and careful experiment design, and the other on "stories" both individual and collective, and their relation to society) - hoped to find the "real" gender problems, look at them with the attention they deserve, and encourage some kind of dialogue for change.
The O. J. Simpson Trial 1995 Professor Shea Criminology CCJ1001 July 26, 2017. It was the night of June 12, 1994, a woman and her long-time male friend were murdered in cold blood. The victims, Nicole Brown Simpson, her neck cut so savagely it almost severed from her body and Ronald Goldman, stabbed repeatedly, nearly 30 times. The accused, her ex-husband and football star, Orenthan James Simpson, better known as O.J. Simpson. During the trial, a trial that consisted of 150 witnesses, lasted 133 days and cost in the ball park of 15 million dollars, there were many questions asked and even more questions left unanswered (Douglas).
The short story, Witness for the Prosecution is a murder mystery written by Agatha Christi. This story centers around a man named Leonard Vole who is charged for the murder of a rich, eccentric woman named Emily French. Suspicions were raised against Vole when French’s maid, Janet Mackenzie places him at the house at the time of the murder and he is named the primary heir to the estate. The only person who can give him an alibi is his wife Romaine Heilger but, she despises him and ends up being a witness for the prosecution. Fortunately, his lawyer, Mr. Mayherne receives a letter that ruins Romaine’s testimony and takes the focus away from Vole. The jury finds Vole innocent, however, Mr. Mayherne soon realizes that justice has not been served.
She explained that his involvement in the crime was not excessive and that it was his brother who was the leader. She went on to describe his eight previous arrests for crimes like robbery and cocaine possession. Given his long history she said she was not surprised to see him involved in this kind of case. Because of his other charges I thought the prosecutor was going to suggest the higher end of the sentencing guidelines. However, as she continued I realized I was incorrect. Instead of focusing on his previous crimes she talked about how he needed rehabilitation. She emphasized recovery from his current lifestyle more than sending him to prison again. She brought up his involvement in his church and his successful marriage and questioned why he would throw all of that away. She also suggested that he turn to his church and his wife for support and to aid him in his battle with addiction. Throughout the case, the prosecutor was compassionate and seemed more like a disappointed parent to the defendant rather than angry. The one time the prosecutor did act somewhat harsh was towards the middle of her statement. She brought up the fact that the defendant had previous medical conditions such as a stab and shot wounds. She suggested that the defense had asked for these injuries to be taken into account when the sentence was decided on. She was adamant that the court should not take