Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Development of military leadership
Building effective teams and teamwork
Military leadership philosophies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Development of military leadership
I believe in the value of leadership. Leadership can take many forms. When you take advantage of it, you will thrive. Authoritarian leaders lead by direction and command such as in the military. Inspirational or authoritative leaders lead by cooperation and example. I believe an example of an authoritarian leader would be Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Allied Commander in the Pacific during World War II and General George S. Patton, Commander of the Third Army in Europe. Without a good, strong leader who can make the best decision for the success, or survival of the group, business or, for that matter, the country, failure is predictable. When I say strong leader, I mean one that can listen and hear their people, consider their thoughts, plans …show more content…
In one situation I was going to race with a friend, he was a better skipper than I was so he skippered. My friend was very laid back and was not good at making decisions quickly which you need while sailing. We got out on the water on a sunny day it was hotter than hell outside and even hotter out on the water. We were out to win, but we didn't we came in last for 4 of the 5 races for that morning. At 12:30 we went in to the beach to have lunch, my friend and I sat next to each other and me said that I could skipper in the afternoon. When we got out on the water after lunch it was even hotter than the morning. It took the race committee about a half an hour to get out on the water. We started racing at 2:00pm and went all the way to 4:30pm. We raced in 4 races and in the last race we won at the line because of a penalty, but before that we had to get into the position to get the penalty. We were on a port tack and the other boat was on starboard tack so I saw that and sailed over to them and was about 10 meters I front of the other boat and tacked. By then we were on the starboard tack and we were down wind so we had the right of way. We were at this time about 50 meters away from the finish line and they were gaining on us and then they made the mistake of turning to far and they hit us. They had to slow down 2 boat lengths so we pulled ahead and crossed the line and won the race. If it wasn't for the cooperations of my friend and the things I learned at camp and from my grandpa the out come of that race would have been different. I believe different situations require different kinds of leadership. The situations Generals Patton and MacArthur found themselves in required one kind of leadership and it worked. On the other hand, this summer my group found itself in a situation that required another model. The best leader knows which type of leadership to use in which situation, and then uses
Denisco & Barker, (2016) discusses the foundation of leadership and the four conceptual pillars that comprise it. Understanding the leadership is a responsibility of an APN, the following final question was posed to Ms. Gordner. “Of the four pillars of leadership; professionalism, inspirational motivation, interpersonal relationships, and business skills, do you feel that one is more important than another, and why?” She responded,
Natural born leaders are almost nonexistent in today’s military. Military members have to complete numerous leadership classes as you progress through the military ranks whether you are an enlisted or as an officer. There are many attributes that people would have to possess to be considered a great leader. Some of those attributes include honesty, respect, trustworthy, and enthusiasm just to name a few. There have been many leaders I have worked with or for over my past 19 years in the Army. One of the most important one would have to be honesty. Honesty is important because if the people that work for you cannot believe what you tell them, they will never trust you or support you. Employees can make or break their supervisor. If they do not like or trust the manager they will not respect them and they will only do the least amount possible. When your employees believe that, you value their opinion and their work ethic. Like you and trust, you they will do anything you ask of them. Whether the decision is right or wrong it is a decision, a leader never want to leave their subordinat...
There are a variety of ways to define both leader and leadership. There is not, however, a clear definition of how to become one. There is no set list of mandatory traits, either innate or learned, that a person must embody to be considered successful or proved a failure. What I feel it takes is the right mix of strengths and weaknesses in a given situation to demonstrate effectiveness. No one person has abilities without accompanying deficiencies. It’s all in the way they are balanced. The balance in the way one uses his or hers’ abilities will ultimately determine the type of leadership one has throughout time. To support these claims I will examine a well-known leader throughout the military, General James “Mad Dog” Mattis. This essay will provide some insight into both his strengths and weaknesses while discussing some personality traits he is said to possess.
In conclusion, all types of leadership are similar in ways such as taking initiative or setting the example. However, different types of leadership have a different perspective depending on the situation. Combat leadership is high-risk and requires a single-unquestioned authority. A certain level of responsibility and decisiveness is necessary. On the other hand, leadership in the dorm has an entirely different perspective, one of patience, listening, and finding a thought-out solution. Both leaders are necessary to lead the group, but differ dramatically in style based on the
Leadership is something I feel is both learned and skilled. Personally, I’ve always felt that I was a more than adequate leader and my decision-making skills were both popular and correct. In this lesson, we’re testing ourselves with tests to determine where we actually fit as leaders. I have never taken tests like this, so was honestly excited to see how I scored.
Leadership is a simple word that easy to say but in reality difficult to apply it. The fact as we can always found, there is still problems about leadership in either military or governmental and civilian. Those who are not able to distinguish between commander and boss will encounter many problems in their leadership. The complexity challenges that they face right now are higher rather than the old times, and the challenges in the future will become more complex. Eventually, if a leader cannot perform his/her leadership by right, it will give bad effect to the members, culture and organization.
A great leader, in my opinion, should know their subordinates and must understand that leadership is not about the leader. For example, if subordinates are doing drugs, the leader should be aware of this and they should be able to spot the signs. Two girls in my squad were addicted to something, but it was not drugs. One of the girls was addicted to pur...
Leaders show up in infinitely varying circumstances and characters. Typically, each individual has a picture of who they see as a perfect leader, but no leader is perfect for everyone. Different circumstances and different people require different character traits and styles for their leaders to be effective. The coach of a high school football team is not going to have the same character traits or leadership style as a kindergarten teacher. Not only is the scope of a leader’s character limited in the minds of individuals, but the circumstances in which a leader is needed, or in which a good leader could be found, is typically a narrow field in the minds of individuals. When good leaders come to mind, they are often pictured as outgoing, authority-demanding,
One of the challenges facing nurses today is learning how to be an effective leader. Assessing and analyzing the style of leadership the nurse possesses is the first step in facing the challenge. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and understand the characteristics of my style of leadership from an assessment performed by Gallup Strength Finders and DiSC and compare the strengths I have in common with Eleanor Roosevelt.
Leadership can be defined in many ways, but one thing all leaders have in common is determination to get a task done. Although leaders may carry out this action in many different ways they all do what needs to be done in order to reach their goal. Florence Nightingale was willing to gather a group of women and pick up and leave her home to tend to the wounded soldiers of the Crimean War.
Situational leadership theory states that instead of using just one style, successful leaders should change their leadership styles based on the maturity of the people they 're leading and the details of the task (Blanchard, et al. 1993). Since the situational approach is “ based on the premise that leaders will match their directive and supportive styles to meet followers’ level of development” (Weiss, 2011) it is the theory best suited to serve today’s military leaders the best. Military leadership, as well as members in general, is developed through sequential events of combat training, education, as well as technical and practical-based events (Hussain & Hassan, 2015). Situational leadership allows leaders to use the necessary approach, be it directive, supportive, or empowering dependent on the situation (battlefield or classroom) and the audience (new recruit or seasoned
It is very common in this day and age to become discontent with where you are at in leadership. One of the reasons for this discontentment can be because influencing all of those around us is not an easy thing to do. If we are to not only stay content, but also excel in leadership we must keep in mind that ninety-nine percent of leadership does not come from the top of any given organization, but the middle. John C. Maxwell, author of The 360-Degree Leader, speaks to us about the principles that leaders can use to bring value and influence to any organization from any level within the organization, enabling them to do, what John C. Maxwell describes as leading up, leading across, and leading down.
I like the fact that the teacher pointed out that leadership can be found everywhere. Leaders don't necessarily exist only in a company where there are a lot of people following you. “Everyone has the potential and possibility to be a leader”. They could be the best at inspiring others, or best at solving problems or dealing with criticism. By and large we all have the necessities to lead and I find, during the group discussions, that the difference and uniqueness of us that give us our own perspective to view and do things. Leadership is also about understanding and combining many different talents and to make them work together to create the best result. There are many kinds of leaders out there, and so many leadership styles. Yet I think we shouldn’t categorised ourselves into one or identify our superiors into one. Why? Because I think it is crucial to be flexible and adapt to which way to lead according to the situations For example, the Democratic style maybe the most popular and most effective, yet it is proved to be counter-productive in urgent occasions requiring instant and firm decisions from one person only, and that is the
The primary leadership theory I believe in comes from John Maxwell and speaks to the dual nature of leadership: leaders are both born and made. I believe that some individuals are born with innate leadership qualities and that those characteristics, though infantile, if cultivated, evolve through lifelong experiences, training and development. Maxwell asserts that born leaders require cultivation: “Leadership is developed, not discovered. The truly “born leader” will always emerge; but to stay on top, natural leadership characteristics must be developed”(Maxwell, 1993 p. viii). Maxwell indicates that individuals who want to become leaders fit into one of four categories: the leading leader, the learned leader, the latent leader or the limited leader.
Leadership is one of the most important facets in organizations. In most cases, leaders act with respect to organizational culture as well as the codes of conduct that determine the manner in which leaders relate with subordinates. Leadership entails the use of effective communication skills to get activities done in the workplace and to ensure that employees shelve their individual interests for the sake of their organizations’ shared targets. It is the role of leaders to ensure that consumers attain high quality products and services by making certain that members of their firms’ workforce are fully motivated to work effectively and utilize resources in an efficient manner (Bass, 22). With the increasingly sophisticated nature of the corporate world, leadership should not be based solely on the desire to control and coordinate affairs within the workplace, but leaders should also exhibit positive examples and continually monitor the changing trends in corporate governance to initiate the most relevant guidelines. Competitiveness can only be attained when leaders are in a position to set the right standards in their firms and coordinate affairs appropriately by understanding consumer and employee needs.