Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of childhood abuse to adulthood
Child abuse during adulthood
Childhood physical abuse effects adulthood
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of childhood abuse to adulthood
On October 22 at 7:30pm in Williams Hall, I watched a film by Marta Cunningham called “Valenetine Road”. The film was about a murder that occurred on February 12, 2008 in Oxnard, California, were either-grader Brandon Mclnerney shot an openly gay classmate Larry King. Although what seemed like an open and shut case, the trial took over three years before the judge and jury was able to deliberate a decision. Coupled with the abnormality of a juvenile murderer and extenuating trail time, the case garnered countless media appearances that choose to depict the case one sided. However, through the film, the background information proved to be vital because the film choose to present both sides of the story persuasively and effectively. This allows …show more content…
the audience to think objectively and raises critical questions about our education and justice system. Using an objective lens, I learned about the impact of nurture, gay culture, and the inability for humans to create a black and white justice system. The value of the film is that humans are easily influenced by nurture.
The nature versus nurture debate has been argued across centuries. Within the film, both Larry and Brandon grew up in abusive families, which complicates their maturity levels. It was evident that both parties had their own supporters. On Larry’s side, people saw Brandon’s actions as a hate crime. In the opposing side, people saw Brandon as a confused juvenile that needed a just punishment that did not jeopardize his entire future. Both parties presented convincing arguments. Ultimately, everything can be broken down into the concept of “nurture” and how vital it is for children to grow up in a positive …show more content…
environment. The significance of the film is it shows how the majority of education and justice system are unprepared to deal with evolving social manners. In 2008, homosexual was already well known. Laws were even passed to prevent discrimination. Although laws are supposed to protect people, the discrimination law provided almost immunity to the homosexual community, which in turn jeopardizes heterosexual communities. Thus, laws cannot be created hastily even if their intent is positive because nothing is purely “black or white”. Within the film, Brandon was not able to seek any help as he felt that he was being bullied from Larry with his comfortable attitude of being openly gay. Although Brandon’s actions are condemnable, one must also learn to consider the struggles of the opposing views. By being able to objectively analyze situations, improvements can be addressed and made. Although the quality of the film was mediocre, the context of the film was enriching. Throughout the film, there was a copyright statement that hindered parts of the film. Additionally, a few photos of the victim and murderer seemed a bit more bias as it foreshadowed the director and film team’s own personal opinions about the case. For example, Brandon (the murderer) possessed an ominous dark lighting was Larry (the victim) was always portrayed happily. This in turn contradicts the films original intended purpose of portraying an objective opinion about the case. The films place in our culture is it reminds us to be open minded towards others.
In an increasing liberal society, we must learn to become more tolerate towards others. The freedom for others to truly express themselves is vital as it’s apart of one’s identity. By embracing others, we become respectful and allow everyone to positively grow in an encouraging environment. According to Marta, though conservative values are diminishing, it is also important for others to also respect their ideals even though they may seem to be unpopular, as it too, is apart of their identity. Thus, although possessing a moderate perspective towards others may be difficult, we must lean to become more selfless. In turn, we all help foster a more harmonious generation that is filled with tolerance and
respect. Over, I enjoyed the insightful film. I admire Marta’s honesty towards her work as she was able to present both the victim and murderers side equally and objectively. Her film was exceptional, and it helped train Oxford students how to think critically instead of what to think. Furthermore, the film has changed my perspective on the community, to never judge and listen to stereotypes about certain regions and people.
On May 7th 2000, fifteen year old Brenton Butler was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens, who had been fatally shot in the head while walking down a breezeway of a hotel with her husband. Two and a half hours later, Butler is seen walking a mile away from where the incident occurred, and is picked up by the police because he fit the description of the individual who shot Mary Ann Stephens. However, the only characteristic of the description that Butler featured was the color of his skin. Police then brought Butler to the scene of the crime in order for Mary Ann Stephens’s husband, James Stephens, to confirm whether or not Butler was the individual who had shot his wife. Almost immediately, Stephens identifies Butler as his wife’s killer.
Hariman, R. “Performing the Laws: Popular Trials and Social Knowledge” from Popular Trials: Rhetoric, Mass Media, and the Law, Robert Hariman, ed(s)., University of Alabama Press, 1990. 17-30.
In the 1930’s a plethora of prejudiced persons are present amidst the prominent Scottsboro trials, a seven-year-long case consisting of false rape allegations made against nine black boys from Scottsboro. When citizens fail to acknowledge their own preconceived ideas and look past the prejudice present in society, justice cannot be served. In the Scottsboro case, the court of Alabama disregards the societal issues surrounding racial discrimination and endorses the guilty verdict and conviction of the nine African American boys. Failing to look past their own personal biases, the jury ignores the unquestionable evidence that would support the boys’ case. Instead, the jury focuses on their predilection
Reading newspapers or watching TV at home, at least we find one article or news describing a killing, a shooting, or an armed robbery. With all these problems, we are in fear but cannot avoid hearing and dealing with them. They happen every day and some time justice system blunders and leads to wrongly convict people for what they do not commit. This is reality of wrecked system that is resulted by injustice and corruption. Ultimately, Errol Morris confirms this reality based on a true story of an innocent convicted Randal Adams for a criminal case by creating a film, The Thin Blue Line. David Harris, an important accuser, claims Adams was a murderer and shot Robert Wood, a Dallas police officer. With Morris’ suspicion of Adams’ innocence, he turns himself to be a detective movie director and investigates the criminal case that occurred in Dallas, Texas in 1976. His goal is to show that Adams was wrongly convicted and justice system was flawed. By using juxtaposition and recreations, Morris successfully contrasts Adams and Harris to show that Adams is innocent and Harris is guilty, intensifies distrust of the legality in Adams’ wrong conviction to prove a flawed legal system, and evinces the eye witnesses are discreditable.
Casey Anthony was a young mother who was put on trial in May of 2011, for allegedly murdering her two year old daughter, Caylee Anthony. The case had a number of key players, ranging from the offender herself, to judges, attorneys, and investigators. Three segments of the trial stick out in particular: the cross examination, the closing arguments, and the sentencing. All were covered extensively by the media, through a number of sources. There were a number of similarities and differences between the selected media sources, anywhere from detail to length, to what opinion the media outlet had itself on the case. Under a criminal profile, Casey Anthony very much fit the characteristics of a criminal psychopath, and the media did very much so have an impact on the outcome of the trial. Overall, the Casey Anthony trial was intriguing and merits both analysis and discussion.
The mass media loves a scandal; it focuses on the most outrageous cases in order to make profit and often blows things out of proportion in order to make a better story. The media coverage of Debra Lafave’s case is a perfect example. The mass media not only hindered the court in leading a fair trial, exposing the teenager at the center of the case by publishing his photo and name in European newspapers, it also allowed the offender to receive a lighter sentence. The crime that Debra Lafave committed, having sexual intercourse with a minor, who was also one of her students, is deviant not only criminally but socially in the United States. Yet the media coverage partially helped her receive a lighter sentence because of the focus on her looks,
As Schwartz introduces the topic of tolerance it seems as if he is going to describe an ideal liberal society with complete tolerance, in every form of the word. Then as he continues onto his forth sentence, this idea is disturbed. He states “And we reserve our strongest condemnation for individuals and institutions that are intolerant.” This shows that tolerance has conditions and limits. Therefore, the question “what are the multi-stages of tolerance, and how does one decide what is tolerable and what is not?” is formed.
...to be more accepting towards others’ flaws, which will prevent these individuals from coping with their issues in a negative manner. Keeping an open-mind can reduce the possibility of violence within society preventing the individuals susceptible to violent outburst from doing so. This could be achieved by reducing the emphasis placed on conforming to an ideal that is seen in media. By showing society that not every person is the same, we can decrease the amount of people who feel neglected in society. Ultimately, if society were to reject the status quo, then there would be a significant decrease of violence in society by individuals subject to the detrimental degradation from those around them.
Media sensationalism is the first thought to come to mind when analyzing this piece from “Losing Matt Shepard”, by Beth Loffreda. A young man tied to a fence, sitting on the ground, beaten and found near death, would grab a reader’s attention, enough to shake our head and wonder what this world is coming to. A young man, slight and youthful in appearance, homosexual, tied to a fence “like a scarecrow” (238), beaten so badly that “the only spots not covered in blood were the tracks cleansed by his tears” (238), leaves the impression of stark brutality, meant to horrify the reader and leave an impression on an emotional level. Leaving an impression the media did, however, not an impression based on fact. The exaggerated journalism exercised in reporting the events of Matt Shepard is not uncommon; the media is catering to the preference of the masses. The public is the media’s platform and the more sensational the event is, the more we gravitate to it, regardless of the integrity of the piece.
In May 2000 a fifteen-year-old black male was picked up by police in Jacksonville, Florida and eventually charged with the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. His name was Brenton Butler and the documentary Murder on a Sunday Morning covered his trial. Thankfully he was acquitted, but it’s easy to see how close he was to going to prison for a crime he didn’t commit. It is commonly estimated that between 2-5% of all prison inmates are innocent. Brenton could have joined them because of the failure of the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Department to administer justice. There were multiple psychological factors that led Brenton Butler to falsely confess to and be charged with the murder. The only witness to the crime, the victim’s husband, was blinded by weapon
In America, violence has always been an integral part of national culture. Crime and bloodshed are glorified both on and off screen. The more disturbing the act of violence, the more enthralled the public seems. The most prolific of crimes, those committed by infamous serial killers, inspire the most attention. As said by Jeff Lindsay, creator of the book series that inspired the wildly-popular television program, Dexter, “We’re sickened and disgusted, but we need to know. And the more we know about the scene, the more we really are horrified” (“Sympathy for the Devils”). Violence, especially committed by this special class of felons, is enthralling. News reports play a role in this strange attraction, as it is through the news that people even have knowledge of such killers, but the evolution in the “serial killer genre” (Lindsay, “Sympathy for the Devils”) of film and television helps to desensitize people to the gruesome murders that are committed. This begs the question of whether this disturbing trend should be stopped, lest the American “culture of violence” (this has a source) continues to grow stronger. Through news reports, film, and television, criminals are constantly romanticized through use of sympathetic characterization and gratuitous depictions of their crimes, which lends to peoples’ increasingly positive attitudes toward violence and, in turn, feeds the growing culture of violence in America.
In one of the first mainstream documentary dramas, The Laramie Project seeks to uncover the truth behind the vicious murder of teenager Matthew Shepard, the victim of a homosexual hate crime in October of 1998. Written by Moisés Kaufman and members of the New York based Tectonic Theater Project, this piece is made up of a series of moments rather than scenes, and told in a series of interviews with the people surrounding the case, be they doctors, policemen, or average citizens of the college town of Laramie, Wyoming. However, amidst the claims of “live and let live” being the local mentality, it is prominent that the town is highly divided regarding its beliefs, with the educated students of University of and the
At the time, society struggled to comprehend how two young teenagers were put on trial as murderers – children were given sympathy for being targeted as victims. However, today journalists and reporters blame the way children are raised for committing crimes. The environment they grow up in and the values that are instilled within them are what influence their every action. While Nathan and Richard were raised in upper-class families, both endured difficult childhoods. Reporters claim that Leopold’s childhood was “scarred by feelings of physical inferiority, the sexual abuse of a governess, and the loss of his mother when he was fourteen” and may be a reasonable explanation for his detrimental actions (Fass 934). This perspective shifted the blame from the teenagers to the parents, who were considered at fault for raising their children irresponsibly.
The way Victoria hurts and the indifference of her captors and spectators is brutally tough to watch. We see the cycle repeat and Victoria suffer with her tormented screams as her memory is wiped each time. We can’t help but sympathize, but at the same time, we’re being asked to sympathize with someone whose crime was unforgivable. It adds to the problem with the public being way too invested in other people 's struggles. This can be tied to the Casey Anthony case that happened in 2008. Casey Anthony was the mother of a two year old girl, Caylee Anthony, who mysteriously disappeared in Florida. When the case finally went to trial, the prosecution painted a picture of Casey Anthony as a promiscuous party girl, unconcerned with her missing daughter and responsible for her murder. This drew much attention to the young mother. Casey Anthony is now an extremely well-known name around the United States, when it should not be. Even though Casey was found not guilty, she still is almost a celebrity for committing a horrendous crime. Along with Victoria, these two women should not be seen as popular.
The all-white jury is challenged with putting their prejudices aside and fairly hearing a case and deciding the guilt or innocence of a black man. At first, the issue is portrayed as an extremely easy decision for the majority of the jury members throughout the movie as they voted each night at a restaurant dinner table. After listening to an emotional closing argument by Carl Lee’s lawyer, in which he told the story in detail of a young 10-year-old girl, who while walking home from the store was brutally beaten, raped, hung and dumped…left for dead. Finally, to the jury he said “now imagine she’s white”. The jury members now come face to face with a moral dilemma.