Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women in literature through time
Women's treatment during the Renaissance
Women in literature through time
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women in literature through time
The women living during the Early Modern period experienced a rather hostile environment, as they were considered man’s unreliable counterpart. Writers of this era often reflected these views throughout their works. Pierre Beaumarchais’ Marriage of Figaro depicted the characters Suzanne and Countess of Almaviva in a similar light. However, Thomas More’s Utopia and Tomasso Campanella’s The City of the Sun strayed from this historical perception of women. The fictitious works of Beaumarchais, Campanella, and More propose alternative political and social reforms embodied within the society of the narrative. After taking into account the role of women in the societies of Utopia and City of the Sun, as well as their ideas about love and family, …show more content…
Suzanne and the Countess of Almaviva would enjoy the freedoms found in More’s Utopia, but Campanella’s City of the Sun would offer the two women greater opportunities. The origin of Suzanne and Countess of Almaviva, The Marriage of Figaro, coveys the standard European belief that women were subordinate to men, especially those of higher social standing. The idea of blue-blood favoritism can be seen in the interactions between Suzanne, the Countess and Count, and Figaro. These characters also symbolize how different groups within European society treated one another. The story revolves around the married Count’s perusal of Suzanne, who was engaged to his servant Figaro. The Count’s position of power gave him control over Suzanne, as well as others, who in turn had to be cautious in her declines of his advances. His attempts to “get [Suzanne] alone for a few minutes to exact an ancient droit de seigneur” are another sign of aristocratic privilege in European society reflected in the work (Beaumarchais 108). The “droit de seigneur” translates to the legal right of a lord or nobleman to sleep with a married or engaged woman. This concept exemplifies an unequal social hierarchy that favored men at the price of women’s rights and freedoms. Had Suzanne and the Countess been placed in Thomas More’s Utopia, they would flourish given the freedoms found within the social structure. Women are allowed to work and vote, implying that they are more involved than their European counterparts, whose contribution to society revolved around their marriage, reproduction, and caring for the husband and children. Raphael explains “The women of priests are the most extraordinary women of the whole country, sometimes the women themselves are made priests”, which is a significant difference from European society and the world of Suzanne and the Countess, as those societies would have never left a highly regarded position left to women. Suzanne and the Countess of Almaviva would appreciate the value the Utopians place on marriage.
While marital unions in More’s Utopia are not forcefully arranged by class or social standing as many in the Early Modern period, they were not based on feelings or true love or passion either. They stressed the concept that choice and great consideration were important in matters concerning marriage. “All men are not so wise as to choose a woman for only her good qualities” (More 58). This caution is seen in their tradition of the bride and groom presenting their naked bodies to one another before the wedding. This idea ensured that both spouses knew exactly what they were getting into. Utopians were especially mindful of choosing their spouse because divorce was unusual and had to be approved by the state. The deliberation shown by couples within Utopia would provide Suzanne and the Countess say in their marriage, similar to this aspect of life in their original work. The Barber of Seville and Marriage of Figaro allows the women to have an opinion on their marriage, as the Rosaline (the Countess) consents to her marriage with the Count and Figaro and Suzanne are both willing parties in their own …show more content…
marriage. The Utopians stand on adultery would present greater opportunities to the two women. Raphael informs More, “They punish severely those that defile the marriage bed” (More 59). The first offense results in slavery for each, the second offense is a death sentence. Women whose husbands were unfaithful were allowed to divorce and remarry. This is a key significant difference in Utopia that would help the women fare well. The shame, severe consequences, and dishonor brought on by being unfaithful would prevent the philandering of The Countess’ husband and Suzanne’s. This would completely alter the life of the Countess in particular, as the Count would no longer hold the belief that natural order of life involves the woman’s job of keeping her man faithful, satisfied, and entertained. This would be yet another way in which the women would thrive in More’s Utopia. A detrimental aspect of Suzanne and the Countess in Utopia would be the structure of families and patriarchal relationships. While women had choice in becoming married in Utopia, once they were wed, a strict submissive relationship was cemented. As in European societies of that period, “Husbands have the power to correct their wives” (More 59). Women were given little freedom and independence in their married life. This statement from St. Thomas Aquinas reflected the beliefs of many people, that “Man has more reason and logic, therefore men should have authority”. This gives the message that women were not considered wise or educated enough to have a say in their own marriage or other affairs, which left all the power and decisions up to men. Similar patriarchal ideas reflected onto the family as a whole, as well as the ideas of government.
On “Their manner of living in society: the oldest man of every family is its governor; wives serve their husbands” (More 39). The family could be described as a “little commonwealth”. The ruler or father tie together the family or kingdom. A ruler does for his subjects as a father does for his children- provides safety, shelter, economic stability, and disciplines. The subjects- mother and children- were expected to show loyalty, love, and respect. An abnormal family structure would be one in which a powerful woman had influence over her hen-pecked and feeble husband. These attitudes reflected the aversion to a dominant woman, which would be a shortcoming to Suzanne and The Countess. Their trick on the Count would be frowned upon in Utopia because it suggests that the women are trying to defy gender roles and the patriarchal society that gave men all the
power. Suzanne and the Countess would be restricted by this idea that women were naturally weaker compared to males, especially in the aspect of work. While every Utopian is required to work, Raphael claims, “Women, for the most part, deal in wool and flax, which suit best with their weakness” (More 34). On the other hand, men were assigned the more crude and strenuous physical labor. While labor division was not uncommon throughout history, this classification of females as the weaker sex was damaging to society’s perception of them. As mentioned earlier, women were allowed to become priests, but in religious festivals, “Both wives and children fall on their knees before their husbands” (More 87). This practice of prostration reflects that the idea that men are more religiously pure than women. This presents another obstacle to the two women, who would then be looked down upon by men. These gender roles are also present in the emphasis on women playing the role of mother and caretaker. The Utopians asserted that “No family may have less than ten persons in it” (More 38). This regulation implies that their society placed a high value on reproduction and fulfilling their obligation of creating a family. These limitations within their work combined with the women’s proper role of being a mother would be very oppressive for both Suzanne and the Countess. It would leave them with little chance for opportunity to do anything other than care-taking or simple tasks. This would change little for Suzanne, as she was used to waiting on and attending to the Countess. These ideas about gender roles are not far from those held by Europeans in Early Modern period.
In Janet Lewis’ “The Wife of Martin Guerre,” the author illustrates the family dynamics of the sixteenth century. Martin would legally remain a minor for the extent of his father’s lifetime, and women’s identity and importance were only known through their husbands. However, Bertrande de Rols, the wife of Martin Guerre, is known as herself in this novel, which expresses that the novel was written according to her experience as the wife of Martin Guerre. Even though it wasn’t acceptable for women to go forward with such accusations, Bertrande de Rols did the right thing by pursuing Arnaud as an impostor because she knew he was not her husband, despite what everyone else said. In sixteenth century France, women were not independent and treated as equals as they are today.
Traditional female characteristics and female unrest are underscored in literary works of the Middle Ages. Although patriarchal views were firmly established back then, traces of female contempt for such beliefs could be found in several popular literary works. Female characters’ opposition to societal norms serves to create humor and wish- fulfillment for female and male audiences to enjoy. “Lanval” by Marie De France and “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” by Geoffrey Chaucer both show subversion of patriarchal attitudes by displaying the women in the text as superior or equal to the men. However, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” also incorporates conventional societal ideas by including degradation of women and mistreatment of a wife by her husband.
In Federico García Lorca’s La Casa de Bernarda Alba, a tyrant woman rules over her five daughters and household with absolute authority. She prevents her daughters from having suitors and gives them little to no freedom, especially with regard to their sexualities and desires. They must conform to the traditional social expectations for women through sewing, cleaning, as well as staying pure and chaste. While, as John Corbin states in The Modern Language Review, “It was entirely proper for a respectable woman in [Bernarda’s] position to manage her household strictly and insist that the servants keep it clean, to defend its reputation, ensure the sexual purity of her daughters, and promote advantageous marriages for them,” Bernarda inordinately
Over the course of time, the roles of men and women have changed dramatically. As women have increasingly gained more social recognition, they have also earned more significant roles in society. This change is clearly reflected in many works of literature, one of the most representative of which is Plautus's 191 B.C. drama Pseudolus, in which we meet the prostitute Phoenicium. Although the motivation behind nearly every action in the play, she is glimpsed only briefly, never speaks directly, and earns little respect from the male characters surrounding her, a situation that roughly parallels a woman's role in Roman society of that period. Women of the time, in other words, were to be seen and not heard. Their sole purpose was to please or to benefit men. As time passed, though, women earned more responsibility, allowing them to become stronger and hold more influence. The women who inspired Lope de Vega's early seventeenth-century drama Fuente Ovejuna, for instance, rose up against not only the male officials of their tiny village, but the cruel (male) dictator busy oppressing so much of Spain as a whole. The roles women play in literature have evolved correspondingly, and, by comparing The Epic of Gilgamesh, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, and The Wife of Bath's Prologue, we can see that fictional women have just as increasingly as their real-word counterparts used gender differences as weapons against men.
In the 1890s, American women emerged as a major force for social reform. Millions joined civic organizations and extended their roles from domestic duties to concerns about their communities and environments. These years, between 1890 and 1920, were a time of many social changes that later became known as the Progressive Era. In this time era, millions of Americans organized associations to come up with solutions to the many problems that society was facing, and many of these problems were staring American women right in the face.
Many readers feel the tendency to compare Aphra Behn's Oroonoko to William Shakespeare's Othello. Indeed they have many features in common, such as wives executed by husbands, conflicts between white and black characters, deceived heroes, the absolute vulnerability of women, etc. Both works stage male characters at both ends of their conflicts. In Othello, the tragic hero is Othello, and the villain is Iago. In Oroonoko, the hero is Oroonoko, the vice of the first part is the old king, and the second part white men in the colony. In contrast to their husbands, both heroines—Desdemona and Imoinda—seem more like "function characters" who are merely trapped in their husband's fates, occasionally becoming some motivation of their husbands (like Desdemona is Othello's motivation to rage, Imoinda's pregnancy drives Oroonoko restless to escape). While Shakespeare and Behn put much effort in moulding them, to many readers they are merely "perfect wives". This paper aims to argue that, Desdemona and Imoinda's perfect wifehood may be the product of compliance to male-dominated societies, where women are
From an outside view, everything in relationships seems to be wonderful. However, on many occasions, taking a deeper analysis of the women and their daily lives, one can realize the true dangers they face around their husbands. It is important to understand the reasons why the women in the following stories behave and feel the way they do. Firstly, in the story “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway, the female character is in danger because her boyfriend wants her to have an abortion. Secondly, in the story “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, Mrs. Louise Mallard is at risk because her husband, throughout years of marriage has limited her freedom. Finally, in the story of “The Chrysanthemums” by John Steinback, it is the frustration Elisa Allen feels towards her life because her husband never shows admiration towards her beauty which leads her to have a melancholic and miserable life. Even though men took an important role in the stories, it is clear they were the cause of the women’s suffering and perilous lifestyles.
Clair's marriage is one built upon the balance of life. She “agrees” with her husband, Harold that their relationship should be built around a paper stating who has paid for what. Lena earns less money than Harold, therefore pays less when it comes to the mortgage. “Since Harold pays more, he had the deciding vote on how the house should disrupt the lines” (161). This unbalance in house distribution represents the unbalance in the relationship. Since the house is paid by Harold, it is designed by Harold. Harold unconsciously forms an ego of superiority after starting his own business and paying his wife. He is the male, therefore he is the leader. Harold's incapability to allow Lena to take charge leads to a lack of a feminine voice in their relationship, which catalyzes the questioning of their marriage . “I'm so tired of it, adding things up, subtracting, making it come out even” (164). The questionable design of the house stems from the questionable rules of the relationship. The dominance of Harold is apparent in Lena’s life, even if she doesn’t notice it. Harold refuses to throw away his old table that he made in college, stating that it has sentimental value. This is just like Lena. Love is not a bundle of rules agreed upon so the couple can live together. A set of rules does not guarantee balance in life. Balance and love, at the end of the day, is the ability and willingness to acknowledge the others faults, and change the rules to ensure
Women in The Count of Monte Cristo possess unique personalities, but intensely similar restrictions. Currently, women in the United States, as well as other countries, are able to have jobs, travel, and participate in many other activities that the ladies Dumas portrays are not allowed to. Feminist analysis of this book reveals the ways of the time and the delicate balance of society’s typical structure. In The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas realistically conveys that when women violate their traditional roles, the balance of life is disrupted. This is evident through descriptions of instances in which females are in the home as well as when they are not.
A utopia is a society that is characterized by being one in which everything is perfect or ideal. The opposite of a utopia is a dystopia, a society where everyday life is less than perfect. These concepts are widely subjective for varying parties, as some may view the utopian society they live in as a dystopia and choose to leave to find true happiness for themselves. This is demonstrated in the novels, Into the Wild, The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, and The Warmth of Other Suns. These three novels each demonstrate the same underlying themes. The main protagonists in each novel must deal with a realization that they are unhappy with the current state of their lives, they had to leave in search of a better life, and they must deal with the changes brought by there actions as it affects the state of the society they left. These various accounts serve to form a concept for the most ideal utopia within the three texts.
Human sacrifice killings is a horrific but devastatingly true reality for some that come too close to the jaws of the Matamoros cult. People usually think of a utopia as an amusement park or just an amazing dream. The dictionary version is often defined as “any visionary system of political or social perfection” (“Utopia”). A dystopia is quite the opposite though. Think of your worst nightmare and that is exactly what a dystopia is. The professional definition is “a society characterized by human misery, as squalor, oppression, disease, and overcrowding” (“Dystopia”). As it goes in 1984, the whole book is based on a dystopian society. Citizens have horrible lives which leave them dehumanized by the central government. They are also being under
...present powerful characters, while females represent unimportant characters. Unaware of the influence of society’s perception of the importance of sexes, literature and culture go unchanged. Although fairytales such as Sleeping Beauty produce charming entertainment for children, their remains a didactic message that lays hidden beneath the surface; teaching future generations to be submissive to the inequalities of their gender. Feminist critic the works of former literature, highlighting sexual discriminations, and broadcasting their own versions of former works, that paints a composite image of women’s oppression (Feminist Theory and Criticism). Women of the twenty-first century serge forward investigating, and highlighting the inequalities of their race in effort to organize a better social life for women of the future (Feminist Theory and Criticism).
Women roles have changed drastically in the last 50 to 80 years, women no longer have to completely conform to society’s gender roles and now enjoy the idea of being individuals. Along with the evolution of women roles in society, women presence and acceptance have drastically grown in modern literature. In early literature it was common to see women roles as simply caretakers, wives or as background; women roles and ideas were nearly non-existent and was rather seen than heard. The belief that women were more involved in the raising of children and taking care of the household was a great theme in many early literatures; women did not get much credit for being apart of the frontier and expansion of many of the nations success until much later.
Many intriguing characters in literature are devised from the apprehension women have encountered with men in the institution of marriage. Although portrayed differently, marriage is perceived as a constraint to the protagonists. This has been presented very well in “The Way Up To Heaven” penned by Roald Dahl who blatantly critiques the accepted societal roles of women in the mid-twentieth century and “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin who highlights a woman’s plight in the 19th century. This is not only painted through the events of the stories, but also through the way each protagonist evolves into a dynamic character. The two main characters in these stories show many similarities, but they are also remarkably different in the ways they deal with their problem to gain independence.
...r’s household most women in this period had no self-respect and were controlled by their husbands.