Utilitarianism: If I Were Living In Nazi Germany

When reading about utilitarianism, it became evident that there are multiple ways to interpret this theory of ethics. However, the classical utilitarianism states that we ought to always to do whatever brings out the greatest amount of pleasure over pain for everyone affected by the action. On the surface, this seems to be a plausible theory, however,when looked at below the surface, there are possible consequences. Utilitarianism is potentially dangerous because the option that has the highest point total could be dangerous. For example, if I were living in Nazi Germany, there might be more benefits to assassinate and kill Hitler despite the fact that the rule of thumb usually says that killing is wrong. The second problem with utilitarianism

is the concept of the rule of thumb. This provides a space for exceptions to be made which could be potentially dangerous. For example, as a rule of thumb, killing is wrong, however, a pregnant mother whose life is threatened by the pregnancy might have to weigh the options of giving birth to the baby vs. having an abortion.
    It is clear that utilitarianism has many applications to our everyday life and history. However, it could be problematic if applied to my future career. As a future teacher, this might be reflected in the grading process. If a student is on the edge between “failing” and getting a D in a class or getting a C- and passing the class, it would be very difficult as a teacher to weigh the positives and negatives of this situation. As a rule of thumb, you have to follow the district grading scale and system. But, if a student could be held back a grade or flunk out of school, the concept of an exception complicates the situation. Utilitarianism can be misinterpreted and can cause complications.