More handpicked essays just for you.
Social norms and their consequences on society
How does society influence one's behavior
How social norms affect human behaviour essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The two essays’ “Usl at the Stadium” by Rivka Galchen and “From is Shaming Necessary?” by Jennifer Jacquet express that society should not shame individuals if it is something that is not sever. Because the shamers’ tend to shame others because they feel like there is no other alternative or way for people to see or understand them. Shaming others can put them in dark spot that can be hard for them to get out of. If shaming is to be used as a punishment then it should be used for serious problems like drunk driving and criminal offenses.
Frist, on the subject of “Usl at the Stadium” there is a character named Usl. Usl had fallen asleep at a Yankees game. As he was sleep commentators turned against him. They had put him on the jumbo Tron,
…show more content…
and everyone had seen him. Because of social media even more people had seen him, he had become an internet sensation. Soon people started to shame Usl for sleep at the game. People were mad because they felt like Usl was sleeping and wasting money. Usl had tried to sue the commentators that he thought were his friends. But that made the shame become worse. They were calling him a fat attention seeker and a triple loser. The shamers’ even told Usl to kill himself. Usl started to think people were just disgusting. He thought this because once in a while people do fall asleep at baseball games, but are never shamed for it. Shaming Usl for falling asleep during the baseball game was mindless and useless. He did what every human being does and that is sleeping. Comparatively, this goes along with “From is Shaming Necessary?” by Jennifer Jacquet.
In the essay Jacquet states that shaming is not preferable, but people feel that it’s the only alternative, because they feel like it is part of their duty and values for them to say something. Even though nobody, but the people close to Usl really know him. The people on social media do not. The shamers’ only understand that he fallen asleep at a game and people pay money to go to that game. So, they get on YouTube or twitter and say all these hurtful thing because they feel like maybe by doing this someone out there would understand and jump on board with them. Because there really is no formal way or reason to punish people then people will use shame. Usl was not never in the wrong. People just wanted that attention and a reason to start something. Like with monkey see monkey do, people started to just jump in and attack Usl. If people were going to shame Usl it should have been a more suitable reason other than sleeping at a baseball …show more content…
game. Furthermore, in Usl at the Stadium there is a change in Usl behavior. Usl felt like everybody was against him and was worried about the comments people were making about him. After time passed Usl had stop going on the internet and then the radio. Because he was constantly worrying he started to lose sleep. Because he was tried he started to snap on the people that loved and cared about him. For example, after everything that happen his mother would say that she loved him. Usl had thought that his mother was very loving. And that if he was a father he would be a bad one, because good mothers are bad. He was blaming his mother for him fallen asleep because she was too caring. He also started to think about going into the woods for ten to fifteen years. Because by then people would forget about him. Then when his boss tried to help him feel better Usl stated yelling at him. Instead of his boss yelling back or fire him. The boss said that he was going to tell him something that he did not want to hear. His boss told him that he loved and cared for him. Which made Usl breakdown in tears. The shame that he was getting was not refining his behavior, but making it worse. In contrast, if shaming is to be used as a punishment, then it should be used for serious problems like drunk driving and criminal offenses.
Usl was just taking a nap at a baseball game and was severally shamed because sleep was punishment to those that shamed him. If that is true than what he did can be compared to drunk driving and criminal offense? But it is not true because drunk driving and criminal offense is an act harmful not only to that individual but also to a community and society. Usl sleeping did not harm anyone. That was his money to waste, not anyone else. The people that shamed him had no right to do that. They made fun of his image and character. Jacquet stated that shaming can change people’s behavior for example drunk driving and criminal offense because those people could hurt or even kill someone. So if they are shamed for the bad things they have done, then maybe they will think twice before hurting someone. Usl was just sleeping and dreaming about life and not bothering anyone Ultimately, Usl was a fictional character based on a real person named Andrew Rector. Rector had went through everything Usl did in April of 2014. Till this day because of social media the video of Rector sleeping and suing commentators can be found on the internet. In the video the commentators were making fun way too harshly of him and the comments on the video are still there, three years later. It is upsetting and shocking to know that this person life was destroyed by
people who did not even know him or why he was sleeping. Anybody could be sleep at the game, but they chose him because they wanted to feed off the attention, as long as it was not them. Both essay’s connects to the real world, that there are people out there that are severely punished because society feels like it is their duty to go out and shame others without understanding the real reasons of their actions. The dream that Usl was having that got him shamed felt like real life, just like the shaming.
This shows a man?s racism and inhumanity towards another man. Tom Robinson hasn?t done the community any wrong but is a social outcast for being black which is not his fault.
... athletes to do as they please. However he does not do a good job of being non-partisan. He leads his readers to believe the only group of people who would do such things are “jocks”. This bias is not true. The newspapers report that University fraternities, and secret societies are as likely, if not more likely, to commit these very same acts. He also leads the reader to believe that all athletes and athletic teams are similar. The impression he leaves about the majority of teams and their members is prejudicial and unfair. It is very unfortunate and disheartening that members of a community that were so highly reguarded, would commit such acts. It is even more disturbing to hear about the scenario leading up to the rape, and the community which produced these troubled young men. It is more important to look at why the events took place rather than who committed them, because ultimately the only innocent person involved is the victim, a mentally handicapped young girl, named Lesli Faber.
Krakauer reveals the truth behind some of the issues with gang rape among football players and the victim. In the end majority of the group will favor the football players more and condemn the victim for being raped. For example, when Beau Donaldson was arrested fans supported him by posting on eGriz stating, “I know nothing about the facts, but I know Donaldson and I have doubts that raped occurred or that this will stick...but my instincts tell me that he didn’t rape anyone (p.53). This shows that sometimes society can be unethical because they choose what they want to believe in despite how severe the problem is and oppose those whom they disagree
“My grandmother and I followed the Yankees together, and by the time I was ten it had become an ongoing conversation between us. Box scores, averages, pitching rotations, prenogis for the World Series – because there was almost never a series without the Yankees” (12). The Yankees were a symbol of American pride for Peter, “they were more than a team...
Neyland Stadium provides a gathering place where over one hundred thousand people come to cheer for the Tennessee Vols. The stadium, located in the middle of the UT campus, ranks as America’s third largest collegiate stadium with a capacity of 104,079; since people began recording attendance, more than 22.89 million fans have watched Tennessee football in the stadium, and the record attendance was reached when the Vols played the Gators in September 2000(UTsports.com). If you think all you can do is watch the games at home on the couch, think again. You can actually be part of these games and fulfill all your football fan needs. If you come watch a game, it will be well worth your time.
Impaired driving is a major issue in our society and is an issue that can easily be preventable unlike many other legal issues. The punishment of impaired driving is barely considered when impaired drivers operates a vehicle while under the influence. It is seen as lenient and study shows that it is a conviction that is repeated multiple times. In order to avoid all of these issues and to fill in the flaws of our government system, the punishments regarding the accused’s conviction of crimes related to impaired driving should be far stricter than the current punishments in order to completely stop impaired driving within our flawed
Main Point I: I’d like to start off by talking about the penalties of drinking and driving. Did you know that drunk driving is the nation’s most frequently committed violent crime? A chronic drunk driver is a person who has driven over 1,000 times before being caught. They do not respond to social pressures, law enforcement, and the messages that have been combined to reform the drinking and driving behavior of our society.
When the victim does not fit the ideal victim attributes which society has familiarised themselves with, it can cause complications and confusion. Experts have noticed there is already a significant presence of victim blaming, especially for cases involving both genders. The fear of being blamed and rejected by the public is prominent in all victims. Victim blaming proclaims the victim also played a role in the crime by allowing the crime to occur through their actions (Kilmartin and Allison, 2017, p.21). Agarin (2014, p.173) underlines the problem of victim blaming is due to the mass of social problems and misconceptions within society. The offender can have “an edge in court of public opinion” if victim blaming exists, resulting in the prevention of the case accomplishing an effective deduction in court (Humphries, 2009, p.27). Thus, victims will become more reluctant to report offences because of their decrease in trust in the police and criminal justice system, leading to the dark figure of
The continuous rate of drunken driving deaths makes a case that the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient and makes a call for stricter laws. There is a need for the United States to improve on their drunk driving penalties just the way the other country’s have done and this is giving them a reduced rate of drunk driving death. The United States can’t go on like this. There is a need for stricter laws to be introduced as the United States.
In early May 2002, a ban that the management of Major League Baseballs’ Seattle Mariners imposed requiring non-admittance of any fan wearing a tee shirt saying, “Yankees Suck” was finally lifted. Telling the Seattle Mariner fans that the word “suck” was offensive and had no place in a family atmosphere, was out of line to many. The backlash from the fans was overwhelming to the point that Mariners management had no choice but to lift the ban. The ban caused three major backlashes: It angered season ticket holders, it told the fans that the first amendment could be twisted at the ballpark, and it tried to strip fans of team spirit and pride. Mariner management ignored the minor uprising as long as possible until the ban reached near boiling point levels. Things have since settled down in Seattle, but hopefully Mariner management will not try a stunt like the ban anytime soon.
Approximately one-third of individuals arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) in the United States are re-arrested, indicating that remedial interventions for DUI offenders are not completely effective. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data indicate that “21-48% of drivers arrested or convicted for DUI had previous offenses for alcohol-impaired driving” (Lapham). When it comes to drinking and driving, society tends to make psychiatric excuses for repeat offenders of alcohol abuse. They are at times labeled as stressed, unemployed, substance abusers, to name a few. Should society be making excuses for these repeat offenders or actively ensuring that they do not become a danger to themselves or innocent individuals on our roads? So much is spent on rehabilitating these DUI individuals but their nonchalant re-occurring actions prove that mandatory jail time should be instituted to curtail the negative and deadly behavior they por...
There is a need for the introduction and implementation of new drunk driving laws by the legislature, because presently the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient. The continuous rate of drunken driving fatalities makes a case that the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient and makes a call for stricter laws. According to Valenti “countries with strict drunk driving penalties have a far lower incidence of accidents than the United States (1). The United States being a first world country is weak in enforcing strict punishment for drunk drivers. Valenti is emphasizing on the fact that the united States need to improve their present laws and be firm in enforcing these new laws. There is a need for the United States to improve on their severity of its drunk driving penalties just the way the other part of the world have done and this is giving them a reduced rate of drunk driving fatalities. The claim of the leniency of the United States drunk driving laws is further stated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), this is a prominent body when it comes to the issue of drunken driving fatalities. It claims that the drunken driving laws are severe enough. “Despite great strides in awareness, education and enforcement in the last two decades the United States still has one of the most lenient drunken driving standards in the world”. (NHTSA of existing laws. There is a need for stricter laws to be introduced as the United States ranks behind the world when it comes to effort to combat drunk driving and more efforts need to be put in place by the implementation of harsher laws so as to reduce the high rate of repeat offenders and first time offenders.
The issues with drinking and driving are very evident within the United States. Many people state that we should put a tag on drunk drivers plates, while others say we should not. This may be against a small portion of our civil liberties, but the benefits outweigh the cons in this situation. By putting tags on previous drunk driver’s plates, future incidents could be prevented and the protection of our citizens could be ensured. Those who are against the idea of certain counter measures for people that drink and drive say that one should not make a display out of someone's past or present mistakes.
Players getting abuse on the pitch from another player can make them feel targeted against. This was the case between Borussia Dortmund goalkeeper, Roman Weidenfeller, and Gerald Asamoah of Schalke. During the match, Weidenfelller clashed with Asamoah and called him a “black pig” (sbs). The goalkeeper was fined 10,000 euros (17,000 usd) and banned for three games (sbs). Although he apologized for the incident, that does not excuse his racism on the pitch.
Two former Vanderbilt football players face the possibility of decades in prison. Corey Batey and Thomas Thurman were the two perpetrators that were captured raping a woman on video that had done viral. Corey Batey was known to be a hard drinker and had many easy hook ups at Vanderbilt University, in which he violated the in multiple ways and urinated on her. The other perpetrator was Brandon Vandenburg, who briefly dated the woman who was raped. Brandon was “not accused of touching the woman sexually, but was found guilty for being the ringleader, gave condoms and egged others on, voice heard on video, instructing them, and laughing” (Blinder, Alan, and Richard PÉrez-peÑa). Security camera images found the men carrying an unconscious woman into a dormitory room. “Several people knew of the assault, but failed to report it” (Blinder, Alan, and Richard PÉrez-peÑa), therefore bystanders need to speak up to consequent the perpetrators. Thomas Thurman, prosecutor in this case, said alcohol was an excuse football players had fallen back on and “these young men appeared to think they were entitled because they were athletes and rules didn’t apply.” Before the case even went to trial, the men were expelled. Another rape case that is very recent is with a Louisville basketball