Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Narrative Structure of Detective Fictions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sherlock Holmes used deduction to solve mysteries. Firstly, Sherlock Holmes used deduction in “The Red Headed League”. For example, Sir Arthor Conan Doyle, author, shares that Sherlock deduced that since Vincent Spalding, or John Clay, spent so much time in the basement, he must have been digging a tunnel to the bank (Doyle). Thus, Sherlock Holmes used deduction to solve the mystery. Secondly, Sherlock Holmes, used deduction in “The Speckled Band”. For instance, Sir Arthor Conan Doyle reports that Holmes deduced that Dr. Roylott is violent, because Helen had bruises on her arm. Therefore, Sherlock Holmes deduced Dr. Roylotts violent behavior. Thirdly, Sherlock Holmes used deduction in “The Copper Beeches”. To illustrate, Sir Arthor Conan Doyle
tells that Holmes deducted that the Rucastles’ daughter Alice, was being kept prisoner. Hence, Sherlock Holmes used his ability of deduction to solve the mystery. For all these reasons, Sherlock Holmes used his mastery of deduction to solve the mysteries.
In John Dickson Carr‘s “House in the Goblin Wood,” Sir Henry Merrivale said, “’Y’know,’ he [Sir Henry Merrivale] said, ‘I’ll always wonder whether I was carrying the‒head.’” (as cited in Mansfield-Kelley and Marchino, 2005, p.151). The investigating styles of Sir Henry Merrivale and Sherlock Holmes are basically polar opposites. Sherlock observes, pays close attention to details, and makes quick connections. Sir Henry Merrivale, on the other hand, is more negligent and naïve. While there are many differences between the investigating style of Sherlock Holmes and Sir Henry Merrivale, there are also some similarities. Both are amateur detectives and use inductive reasoning.
How Does Arthur Conan Doyle Create Tension And Suspense In The Speckled Band The Speckled Band is just one of the murder mystery stories featuring the famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. Holmes was not any ordinary detective, he was a detective who was famous for solving murders. In this case Holmes is trying to solve the mystery of the 'Speckled Band'. Some examples of tension building techniques are dramatic events and in some instances the inclusion of red herrings. Bad weather and night time are also used as a means of building up atmosphere and tension.
No, Sherlock Holmes is not guilty of killing Dr. Roylott. The story, “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” was written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. There are three claim statements that supported why Holmes was not guilty of this viscous crime. The weakest claim was that Sherlock had no clue where Dr. Roylott was positioned while in his room. The mediocre claim was that Sherlock Homes was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia Stoner and wanted to murder Helen due to money. Lastly, the strongest claim was that Sherlock Holmes used self-defense to protect himself from the swamp adder. Therefore, these three claims could prove that Holmes was not guilty due to his misdemeanors.
In both The Great Mouse Detective and Sherlock Holmes, the main detectives, Mr. Holmes and Sir Basil, make key observations that help find their scoundrel, Mr. Ratigan and Blackwood. Sir Basil and Sherlock Holmes both detect important observations through the process of deductive reasoning, which is how they come to their conclusions without doing much physical work. In Sherlock Holmes, when off a case, Mr. Holmes would write books, about tobacco to keep his wit sharp, while in The Great Mouse Detective Sir Basil would play the violin to keep his mind active and concentrated. Sir Basil and Sherlock Holmes both solve their cases with the help of an associate.
Grimesby Roylott was extremely intelligent meaning that Sherlock Holmes would not have known he would allow the snake to bite him. Dr. Roylott had numerous practices in India with several deadly animals. In fact, he owned a cheetah and a baboon that roamed freely through his front yard. He planned out the murder of Julia paying close attention to cause and effect details thoroughly. Dr. Roylott worked with this snake often. He was not dead, so he had not sat in the chair, previously. He was able to train the snake with milk to do what he pleased. Dr. Grimesby Roylott even had a leash with a noose at the bottom to catch the snake. There was no way in its entirety that Sherlock Holmes or Dr. Watson could have predicted Dr. Grimesby Roylott would be bitten by the snake. If Dr. Roylott had been so educated, how could he have made such careless mistakes? Although Dr. Roylott had the greatest fault, Sherlock Holmes could have been more careful when the snake entered Julia’s
One trait that Sherlock Holmes possesses is determination. For instance, when Sherlock took some of the yellow powder that was present by both of the dead bodies that had died from “the plague” and went to Guilford to find out what it was. On his way back from Guilford, he ran into Virginia. On page 153 Virginia asked, “So you risked your life based on the fact that you thought everyone else was wrong and you could prove them wrong?” Sherlock didn't know what it was and if it had caused the plague like death, but he was determined to prove that it wasn't the plague. Another example was when
Every time Holmes got new information about the problem or Helen Stoner, he became more and more enthusiastic which made Him even keener to solve it. He was very cautious about who he spoke to. To solve the mystery in the best way Sherlock Holmes could, he examined every possibility there was, very carefully. The story of the Speckled Band was written from Watson’s point of view.
Mysteries have always held great fascination for the human mind, not least because of the aura that surrounds them and the realm of the Unknown into which they delve. Coupled with the human propensity of being particularly curious about aspects which elude the average mind, the layer of intrigue that glosses over such puzzles makes for a heady combination of the literary and the popular. In the canon of detective fiction worldwide, no detective has tickled the curious reader’s imagination and held it in thrall as much as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes. The 221-B, Baker Street, London ‘amateur’ detective combines a rare blend of intellectual prowess and sharp wit to crack a series of baffling riddles.
The acclaimed authors, Edgar Allan Poe and Arthur Conan Doyle, formulate the characters of Auguste Dupin and Sherlock Holmes respectively, to be similar in the way that they analyze, deduce, and connect segments of desperate and often-thought “unsolvable” detective cases. Through their comparable techniques and system of deduction, Dupin and Holmes never fail to trace back their evidence to the scene of the crime. However, due to the vast difference in the writing styles of Poe and Doyle, the audience observes the main characters not as clones, but rather an analogous pair that think alike, but do not act alike. The personalities of Auguste Dupin and Sherlock Holmes, although present are recognizable differences in their actions, continue to
to ask for help with the case of her sister’s murder. She tells us the
An examination of Sherlock Holmes' abilities and techniques. allied to his personal characteristics, enable him to solve crimes. There are many reasons to explain why Sherlock Holmes is one of the world's most famous fictional detectives. However, the main reason for This is that not only are the stories complex, but the actual character of Sherlock Holmes has extreme depth, with some subtle. elements of his character only becoming apparent when he is in certain situations.
The very essence of any detective story is the mystery. Unlike murder mysteries, which have a lot in common with detective stories, Holmes's problems are not invariably as severe as homicide. These mysteries are not usually insignificant though, and "Often they have to do with theft or murder" (Adventures). The first mystery may be an important and confusing conundrum, but there is often a more worthy case that presents itself after the first has commenced. This adds a level of intrigue to the tale because "The first story leads towards dissolution, the second towards restoring order" (Horsley). In each adventure, someone has been or is in danger of being wronged by another person, and comes to Sherlock for help. This creates "A clear and unambiguous triangle of characters - the investigator, the victim, and the transgressor" (Horsley). All of this is incorporated into the author's puzzle.
Deduction is the third characteristic of rationalism, which is to prove something with certainty rather than reason. For example, Descartes attempted to prove the existence of God through deductive reasoning in his third meditation. It went something like this: “I have an idea of a perfect substance, but I am not a perfect substance, so there is no way I could not be the cause of this idea, so there must be some formal reality which is a perfect substance- like God. Because only perfection can create perfection, and though it can also create imperfection- nothing that is imperfect can create something that is perfect.
Deductive reasoning is general information people have and use to reach to some type of conclusion. Deductive is done by understanding the first part which is using logic to reach a conclusion which reasoning is to understand what is going on. There are many different ways to explain what is required of deductive reasoning. For example, in an article, it states, “logical way of reaching a conclusion based on ded...
Holmes recognizably, had a unique talent for deduction. He was well known to have an unusual gift for investigative talent. Sherlock Holmes was a non-typical avant-garde detective who thought out of the box when solving crimes. He was able to draw inferences, based on very careful observations. Holmes was known to say “when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains however improbable, must be the truth.” Additionally, Sherlock could play the violin well and considered himself a loner. He was also an expert Single Stick player, boxer and swordsman. Ideally, Sherlock had a practical knowledge of British law.