Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion written and unwritten law in Malaysia
An introduction to the concept of law in Malaysia
Concept of Law in Malaysia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion written and unwritten law in Malaysia
Law is a body of enacted or customary rules recognized by the community as binding. It is normative in character, capable of change overtime and also carries a sanction or punishment for disobedience. There are three sources of Malaysian Law which are written law, unwritten law and Islamic law.
Malaysian legal system practices parliamentary democracy and headed by Yang di-Pertuan Agong which is the King. The King is elected by the Conference of Rulers to preside and rule the country for a five-year term. The King is selected among the nine states rulers namely from Perak, Kedah, Perlis, Johor, Pahang, Terengganu, Negeri Sembilan, Selangor and Kelantan. Today’s Constitution of Malaysia clearly states that the separation of power between legislative, judiciary and executive. There are two sources of law in Malaysia which is written and unwritten law. The written law is the most vital source of law and it
…show more content…
Unwritten law means law that is not enacted by the legislature and cannot be found in the written law. Unwritten law consists of Common Law or English Law, Judicial Precedent and Customary Law. Part of the law in Malaysia is formed by the English Law. There are two conditions to apply English Law in Malaysia where there is “lacunae” in the local statues covering the same matters or the law suits the local circumstances. There are two conditions to apply English law in Malaysia. First, there is a lacunae in the local statues covering the same matter and the law suits local circumstances. Judicial precedents is the decisions of the superior courts which is federal court, court of appeal and high court. There are two categories of judicial precedent which is binding and persuasive. In binding, all the decisions of higher courts bind to the lower courts. The high courts are bound by their own decisions. While in persuasive, the High Court judges are not bound to follow the decisions of another High Court
The application of these laws in the real world has become a hot debate as to whether the Australian legal system is based on justice and fairness. This is strongly related to the judge-made laws. Judge-made laws or common laws rely on the doctrine of precedent. This means that the decisions made by judges in the courts are based on previous cases that have similarities with other cases. The decisions in the doctrine of precedent are normally based on the higher authority court decision.
Hammarabi's Law Code Many people may not know it, but they have heard of Hammurabi's Law Code before. This is where the fabled "eye-for-eye" statement came from. However, this brutal way of enforcing laws was not always the case in ancient Mesopotamia, where Hammurabi ruled. The Laws of Ur-Nammu are much milder and project a greater sense of tolerance at an earlier time. The changing Mesopotamian society dictated this change to a harsher, more defined law that Hammurabi ruled from.
This characteristic is a good quality of its government, which is divided in three branches: the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. The executive branch is set to make sure that laws are carries out the proper way. The Governor, the Lieutenant General, and the Attorney General are part of this branch. The legislative branch is composed by the Senate and the House of Representatives, which makes it a bicameral branch. Its job is to generate laws and balance the budget. Then, the judicial branch, composed by the supreme court, county and local courts, is in charge of civil and criminal cases. In other words, such system is very much like the check and balancing system of the Federal
Laws are objects that dictate how people act every single day, but laws are not just made easily with a flick of a wand, there is a specific and tough process to go through if a bill wants to become a law, which
There are four sources of Law in the Australian Legal System. They are Statute Law, which is made in Parliament, Common Law and the Law of E...
Laws are structured and implemented to benefit the masses. Unfortunately this objective is not always achieved. The constitution of the states is considered the best work of law yet it is unable to save the life of a child. Clearly the problem of violence is turning more into a socio-cultural and psychological problem than a legal one. However laws still need to be implemented justly in order to preserve the freedom and rights of me...
In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
Law is a social construct, which is a result of various external social influences like culture, history, politics, economy and power. It describes the society that it exists in as it is the ideologies and values of a society that are embodied as rules and principles of law. Law constructs a framework for the society, according to the goals, interests and understandings of the people of that society i.e. It reflects the ideals, ideas and ideologies of a distinct legal culture.
Legal Pluralism is the presence of various legal systems within a single country or a geographical area. Legal Pluralism is omnipresent although it is generally assumed to exist in countries only with a colonial past. This is because in most countries with a colonial past, colonial laws co-exist alongside indigenous laws. However, if we look at the expansive definition of legal pluralism, it can be said that every society or country if legally plural. The modern definition of legal pluralism also deals with the issues of relation between state and non-state legal orders. It shows the dichotomy that exists between customary legal norms and state law. The judiciary of India has upheld this principle of pluralism in many cases by showing that
Law is a tool in society as it helps to maintain social control, promoting social justice. The way law functions in society and its social institution provide a mechanism for solutions. There are many different theories of the function of law in relation to society in considering the insight they bring to different socio-legal and criminological problems. In the discussion of law’s role in social theory, Leon Petrażycki and Eugen Ehrlich share similar beliefs in the jurisprudence of society. They focused their work on the experience of individuals in establishing meaning in their legal relations with others based on the question of what it means to be a participant in law. Jürgen Habermas presents a relationship between law and morality. From a certain standpoint, law is a key steering mechanism in society as it plays an educational role in promoting conducts, a mean of communication and it
The Employment Act in Singapore is an act that covers every employee who is under the contract of service to their employer except employees engaged under managerial and executive levels or domestic workers. If either party intends to end the contract, they may do so with a notice of their motive of termination. Employees may need to serve a notice period before leaving, which ranges from 1 day to 1 month.
What is international law and is international law really considered to be law; the answer to these questions can be found in the examples of different international resolutions. Some of these examples of when the law has been followed and upheld can be called law can be found in the examples of New Zealand v. France with the bombing and sinking of the Greenpeace vessel. Another example can be seen in the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Untied States of America in regards to the United States shooting down an Iranian commercial aircraft. There also is an example in the case of New Zealand v. France where the law was not followed so could this still be considered law.
In countries where religious law is prominent, it is very important and respected. It is divine law , and strives to guide human behavior with spiritual mandate. Religious law serves as a representation of the religions values and morals. Most followers of this type of law believe that the law came from God(s).
According to Reference.com (2007), law is defined as: "rules of conduct of any organized society, however simple or small, that are enforced by threat of punishment if they are violated. Modern law has a wide sweep and regulates many branches of conduct." Essentially law is the rules and regulations that aid in governing conduct, handling disputes, and dealing with criminal actions.
The Rule of Law means that the state should govern its citizens, in a way which works with the rules that have been agreed on. The Rule of Law is simply a fundamental principle of our constitution. Britain and other Western democracies are different in that Britain has an unwritten constitution, meaning that our constitution is not found in a certain document but that we actually have a constitution from the rules about who governs it, and about the powers they entail and how that power can be passed or even transferred. The Constitution includes; Acts of Parliament, Judicial decisions and Conventions.There are three main principles around the Rule of Law being the separation of powers, the supremacy of Parliament and the Rule of Law. The