Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The international involvement on the suez crisis
US role in suez crisis
Suez crisis and united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The international involvement on the suez crisis
How did the historical facts change Peacekeeping operations before and after the cold war? History
In order to understand the concept behind peacekeeping we have to first look at the history of this UN term and how it got established. The initial kick-off year was 1948 (un.org) when the Security Council deployed troops to the Middle East in order to observe the region. It was the outcome of the creation of the state Israel and the rest of the land piece was given and left over to the Palestinian Arabs. The Arab society and the Arab Nation leaders did not accept this division which caused the conflict. At first the UN sent only observers and peaceful troops to the region which should calm down and settle the issue but this didn’t help and the Israeli peacekeeping mission is the longest running UN mission of all time. The Mission goal changed and developed over time because other issues arose and the activities of the UN mandate spread over Egypt, Lebanon and several other Arab nations. (mapleleafweb.com)
Suez Canal Crisis
This spread-over peaked in the Suez Canal crisis in July 1956 (un.org) when Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal Company against the protest of the West especially the United Kingdom and France. On the October 13 the Security Council came together and formed a resolution which included certain rules and guidelines on how Egypt is allowed to operate the Canal. Around 2 weeks after this resolution was proposed the Israeli military in combination with the Brits and the French launched a missile attack on Egypt as they were falling under the power of the soviets and occupied Sinai and the Gaza Strip. (un.org) After this attack soon later the Brits a...
... middle of paper ...
...ture of Peacekeeping Operations: Fighting Political Fatigue and Overstretch . European Journal of International Law, 1(3), 1-14.
This paper was written in 2009. It’s about the future on peacekeeping and it addresses topics e.g. how the operations could fail?
Jonstone, I., & Gowan, R. (2007). New Challenges for Peacekeeping: Protection, Peacebuilding and the “War on Terror”. International Peace Academy, 1, 4-11.
This paper is a very good paper written by Johnstone and co-authored by Gowan. It mainly talks about the Phenomena which came after 2001 and the terror and how fighting terror could be a new peacekeeping issue.
Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p.1
I had to take his ideas as they are the main focus of the view of the constructivists and he is and was the main leader of that ideology.
The crisis took place on the Suez-Canal in Egypt during the cold war years of the 1950’s. Gamal Abdel-Nasser was in charge of Egypt in 1954. He wanted to improve conditions in Egypt, and so he decided that he would build the Aswan Dam. In order to fund the construction of the dam he seized the Suez- canal, and charged each passage that sailed across it. The British, French, and the Israelis, who strongly opposed the idea, used this as a reason to attack Egypt.
In the early years of Canada before Confederation Canada had been defended by the British Army, and some units known as the Canadian Militia. After a few years new units were created to defend Canada such as the Royal Canadian Horse Artillery, the Royal Canadian Dragoons. These troops participated in many missions to protect Canada, one of them would be the North West Rebellion for Confederation in 1885 in which Canada fought against Saskatchewan to bring peace, and secure the province. In this battle 58 soldiers lost their life, 98 got wounded, and 26 were capture. For World at War 1 all this militias came together to create the Canadian Expeditionary force, this force was mostly full of volunteers there we around 619,646 soldiers in the force at that time in which they fought many battles during World at War 1. One of the most famous one is Vimy Ridge, at Vimy Ridge all the allied forces could not get through since the ridge Germany had a an advantage in a high location in which their army was placed. Canada as a young nation no one believed that Canada would get passed it. But on April 12, 1917 Canadian Soldiers had full control over the ridge, but this had not been achieve easily it cost the life of 10,602 Canadians. For World at War 2 in the 1940s The Canadian Militia was renamed to the Canadian Army. This new army was formed as part of NATO which is in charge of the protection of all North America. Canada also fought many battles in World at War 2 to free, and protect the liberty of other countries, and people specially the Jewish community. Since then Canada knew the great power they have to help people in need at the end of World War 2 In 1939, 20 Years later in 1956 Canada became part of the United Nations.
Chandler, David G. "The Road to Military Humanitarianism: How the Human Rights Ngos Shaped a New Humanitarian Agenda." Human Rights Quarterly. 23.3 (2001): 678-700. Print.
Kash, Douglas A. “An International Legislative Approach to 21st-Century Terrorism.” The Future of Terrorism: Violence in the New Millennium. Ed. Harvey W. Kushner. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
"Second Generation Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) Practices in Peace Operations: A Contribution to the New Horizon Discussion on Challenges and Opportunities for UN Peacekeeping." United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations. http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/documents/2GDDR_ENG_WITH_COVER.pdf (accessed May 19, 2014).
Palmer, Alex. "Evil by Any Other Name: Humanitarian Intervention for the 21st Century " Harvard International Review 32, no. 3 (2010): 31-35.
McLaughlin, Greg, and Stephen Baker. The Propaganda of Peace. Bristol, UK: Intellect Ltd., 2010. Print.
“United Nations Peacekeeping.” United Nations. Web. 2 Feb. 2010 . The United Nation's website that tell about how the UN keeps peace in foreign states, the definition of peacekeeping, and the missions the UN is currently involved in and the mission it has completed.
One of the greatest threats to peace is the actions of belligerent actors in a state, who thrive on breeding conflict and espousing chaos. It is imperative, then that such intrastate and interstate conflicts can be focused on to bring about peace and ultimately a successful resolution to these issues. Following such conflict, the need for peacekeeping is apparent. How effective the peacekeeping actually is, is a topic that all of the authors discuss. Peacekeeping can be an effective tool when properly employed and with adequate resources and backing. In proving its effectiveness, successes and failures can serve to show how best to employ it and the effects of changing post-war, volatile regions into peaceful ones.
I am pursuing a Master’s in International Affairs through American University’s Global Governance, Politics, and Security Program. My emphasis is on security risks that arise from great powers and non-state actors in the international system. To these ends, I have taken courses on great power politics, countering terrorism, insurgency/counterinsurgency, and intelligence in foreign policy. The takeaways
... (Karlsrud, 2015). Despite the UN’s involvement in peacekeeping and mediation, the concept of stabilization is actually conflicting to what the UN peacekeeping operations are intended to accomplish. In most cases, these UN missions were not given a specific mandate endowed with peace-enforcement, but rather a general mission to ‘neutralize’ the intended state, and protect the civilians using all indispensable means.
One should not forget that the United Nations is an international organization comprising almost all world countries, and its ability to respond to conflict, is directly dependent on the political will of the Member States. Also significant is the financial aspect - a lack of funds expensive peacekeeping
...on on terrorism, it has to be acknowledged that the body of international law in the field of counter terrorism has undergone a massive upheaval, more so than in any other field of international law. From a complacent, sectoral, sanction less participation of Anti-Terrorism treaties before 2001 to an accountable, unified, obligatory and mandatory compliance participation post 2001, the transition has been enormous. Even then, the rampant deaths of innocent civilians at the hands of these terror outfits continue. Terrorism continues to be one of the most serious threats to mankind and civilisation and its only resolution lies through percolation of international cooperation and inspiration.
Following the establishment of the United Nations (UN) after the Second World War, there has been ongoing debate and conflicting opinions with regard to the ability of the ‘universal international organisation’ to uphold peace and security in the international system (Muravchik 2006; Melber 2011; Ryan 2000: 1-4; Weiss and Zach 2012: 374-375). There are several scholars and professionals who argue that the UN has been – and will continue to be – a ‘central institution’ with a ‘critical role’ in the maintenance of international peace and security (Roberts and Kingsbury 1994: 9 Donlon 1996: 576). This view reflects the central argument of neoliberal institutionalist scholars, who assert that international organisations or institutions are independent