United Cereal

1375 Words3 Pages

Problem Identification
United Cereal, is an establishment with experience of more than 100 years in the breakfast food business. This corporation is going through difficulties in making a choice for the launch of its latest cereal product. United Cereal is a multinational organization with worldwide experience. The issue here is that the company's vice president Lora Brill is deep in thoughts about whether she should adapt the idea of Eurobrand and launch the Healthy Berry Crunch throughout Europe or that pursuing France is the best alternative for launching Healthy Berry Crunch. The VP needs to think critically about the situation in order to select the most ideal option.
Porters Five Forces Analysis
Threat of New Entrants: The barrier of …show more content…

This alternative contains numerous significant features that works in favor of the implementation if chosen. The initial benefit will be the growing interest of French buyers in regard to healthy products. This however, provides an opening for the company to harness. Furthermore, since this segment is somewhat new in the industry, especially in France, the competition will most likely be minimal. Also, by entering this new segment of the market, the corporation can attain a first mover advantage and obtain a sturdy hold in the French market as well. Implementing the Eurobrand strategy in France will be great since it has a good geographical location. There will also be cost savings between 10%-15% which will be a great benefit for the company. Also, cost savings will favour the long-term plan of the company and will provide it with the influence to settle and discover other markets as well. A disadvantage of going into France will be the high costs and risks in introducing this Healthy Berry Crunch cereal. Also, Cereal is not the primary choice for the French people when it comes to breakfast. Moving on, another concern in regard to a full-scale launch of Eurobrand is the company's structure. Within the case, the company's vertical integration is considered as a good one because of its traditional setting and how it averts many dangers. Hitherto, it can be negative as …show more content…

Also, by using Eurobrand teams, the company can obtain more information about the similarities and differentiations within cultures and be able to device that into their product-making and distribution plans. Another advantage will be attaining higher economies of scale by becoming more of a power house throughout Europe by standardization. Furthermore, a sturdy standardized brand name will grow the marketing power United Cereal has throughout Europe. Lastly, a more swift and aggressive plan such as Eurobrand can avert the Podcafe fiasco problem. Moving on, one con of this option is that the is a high check attached to Eurobrand, and therefore, in a recession, cash flow is not readily accessible like before, especially with diminishing revenues. Furthermore, if the power of the GMs within the company are diluted, it can interrupt the harmony in the organizational structure leading to a lot of esteemed people leaving or becoming unmotivated. It will also be a bad idea on the company's part to ignore local cultures and markets. This is because for them to be able to compete with Kellogg, they will need to achieve competitive advantage by attaining shelf-space, delivery chains, and brand within the community. Lastly, a leader chosen for the Euroband strategy ought to be obvious. This is due to the fact that, if administrators do

More about United Cereal

Open Document