Together with the common law, the Uniform Commercial Code is one of the primary sources of contract law in the United States. The Uniform Commercial Code is commonly known as the UCC, that have been promulgated in conjunction with a purpose to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial exchanges within the U.S. As a model law, it's really proposal that each state has to choose whether to adopt or not but the code was enormously successful that it has been enacted in all of the 50 states, although with variations. Once they are adopted by the states they become state statute. Among other things, Article 2 of the UCC governs transactions for the sales of goods that are moveable items and they have to be tangible. The UCC also provides different provisions relying upon whether parties to a contract are merchants or non-merchants (referred to individuals who don't have expert knowledge about the goods he/she deals in). …show more content…
The common law “mirror image rule” tells us that to have a contract, the offer and the acceptance must be the same.
If the acceptance doesn't “mirror” the offer, we don't have a contract. Under the UCC, a different set of rules apply. First and foremost, we have to ask if other parties merchants are not. In any case when both parties are non-merchants, then any additional or contradictory terms are to be construed as proposals. They don't become part of the contract unless the other party specifically accept those terms. This rule applies to sales between a merchant and a non-merchant or two non-merchants. In any case when both parties are merchants, the UCC tells us that additional terms in acceptance between merchants become part of the sale contract; unless the offer saysaless the offeree can't add terms, or if the additional terms materially change the contract, or finally if the offeror opposes to the additional terms within a reasonable time
frame. The common law “mailbox rule” applies where parties to a contract communicate from a far distance. The rule permits acceptance upon dispatch as long as the offeree conveys his acceptance by the same or faster means used by the offeror. The UCC acknowledges the mailbox rule, but relaxes the common law's treatment by requiring that acceptance need only be made in a reasonable manner by a reasonable medium. Therefore, under the UCC, acceptance may be slower than an offer. In addition, the UCC provides gap filling provisions in which parties leave a gap in contract, which is often known as “open terms”. Where a common law contract would fail for indefiniteness, the UCC will find a contract enforceable even if it omits price, place of delivery and time for shipment, etc. For instace, if the destination of delivery is omitted, the UCC provides the place of delivery as the seller's place of business. If a contract omits the time and place of payment, the UCC states that payment is due at the time and place where buyer is to receive the goods. The problems the UCC was designed to address include the ever growing complexity of transactions and laws dealing with transactions and the differences in state laws making itnce difficult to conduct business on an interstate level. If the UCC did not exist it would have a chilling effect on interstate commerce due to the lack of foreseeability involved in business transactions. It would add to legal expenses since you would have to be familiar with the laws of every state in which you do business. In addition, since there would likely be difference in laws and the interpretation of laws it would result in unnecessary thus driving up the costs of goods. The UCC also minimizes the use of legal formalities while making business contracts. This helps in reducing intervention by lawyers. However, there are some drawbacks regarding the lack of uniformity. The UCC, however differs from state to state, it requires businesses to understand difference. The rules under the UCC can be confusing since there is a general rule for non-merchants, and a different rule for merchants and then exceptions to the rule.
This is clearly an incident where the offeree, McLaughlin, did not accept the terms as stated in the offer which is what Cheeseman (2013) explains did not meet the mirror image rule: “for an acceptance to exist, the offeree must accept the terms as stated in the
A Louisiana attorney is constantly asked by non-Louisiana peers if the state ever adopted the Uniform Commercial Code or if they are still using the old, outdated, Napoleonic Code. Though Louisiana has stark interpretations of the relevance of the UCC, the state has adopted the code in piecemeal. This article is a partial synopsis of introducing readers to a few of the concepts of UCC as adopted by Louisiana compared to the existing principles of the law of sales.
The primary purpose of the “Statute of Frauds” (SOF) is to protect the interests of parties once they are involved in litigating a contract dispute (Spagnola, 2008). The relevant statutes are reliant upon state jurisdictions to determine whether the contract falls under the SOF, and whether the writing of the contract satisfies the requirements of the statute of frauds (Spagnola, 2008). However, all contracts are not covered under the SOF. In essence, for a contract to be deemed as legal by definition of the SOF, there must be verification of the following requirements for formation of the contract, which are as follows: (1) There must be least two parties to the contract, (2) There must be a mutual agreement and acceptance on the price to pay for goods and services offered, (3) The subject matter or reason for entering the contract, must be clearly understood by all parties to the contract, (4) and there must be a stipulated time for performance of duties under the contractual obligations (Spagnola, 2008). Lastly, there are five categories of contracts that are covered under the SOF, which are as follows: (1) The transfer of real property interests, (2) Contracts that are not performable within one year, (3) Contracts in consideration of marriage, (4) Surtees and guarantees (answering to the debt of another), and (5) Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) provisions regarding the sale of goods or services, legally valued over five hundred dollars ($500.00) (Spagnola, 2008).
...is not in writing, the contract is still enforceable because the standard purchase order contains the required elements. Bill’s oral agreement serves as authorization.
In all but name, building codes have been present in the construction industry for thousands of years. They can be found as far back as 1700BC, when King Hammurabi declared that the builder was responsible for and structural failure that occurred (Remmer & Norton, 1981). In a somewhat biblical fashion, the builder received ‘An eye for an eye’ punishment. Codes of practice have vastly evolved, however are still an essential component of the industry.
When discussing the concept of contract law, there exist two bodies of legal rules that may apply to the contract. These bodies are the common law of contracts and Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code or the UCC. The common law of contracts is court made and is constantly changing, but the UCC is required in every state within the U.S.A. It is important to know which one to use and when, as well as what the differences between them are.
Legal Studies Essay Joey Agerholm Exclusion clauses determine the liability of something that might go wrong within a contract. They are used by sellers as an attempt to avoid or limit their liability. The seller has the advantage over the buyer who must agree to the clauses to purchase the product/service. Because of the buyers disadvantage the court takes such cases, involving exclusion clauses, very seriously, and the content of the clauses are carefully interpreted. With the current Trade Practises Act and the Fair Trading Act the standard form of business contract is adequate and effective in protecting the buyer. The Trade Practise Act is the most effective legislation for the protection of the consumer. It implies to the following situations:- - “A promise by the seller that the buyer will become the owner” If a car dealer breaks a promise or part of a contract, for example that he has the right to sell a car, and the car is stolen then although the buyer will have to give the car back he/she will get her money back. - “ A promise by the seller that goods will fit the description supplied by the seller” In this case the buyer is protected if the seller makes a promise, which is a condition of the contract, describing the product, and when the buyer receives the product, it does not match the description. - “ A promise where the seller is made aware of the purpose for which the goods are required, that the goods will be reasonably fit for that purpose” This condition is implied when the buyer makes the purpose of the goods needed known to the seller, and the buyer then relies on the seller’s judgement in providing the correct product. For example it would not be reasonable if you made the seller aware that you wished to purchase something suitable for mowing the average suburban backyard and you were sold a tractor. - “A Promise that goods are of merchantable quality” According to this act a good is considered to be merchantable if they are suitable for the prospect for which other similar goods are sold, involving the description applied to them, the price and any other relevant information. This act does however does not protect the consumer if he/she has examined the product and missed any defects that should have been seen or if the seller made him/her aware of the defect prior to the purchase of the product.
With commercial dealings on the rise in Australia and globally, so too are the complications. If some sort of codification is not established and built from the principals that already exist, commercial opportunities could be in jeopardy due to the uncertainty and risk of not having a clear outline or set of laws to cover contracts generally.
Contract law controls most agreements between parties, whether oral or written, that involve goods, services, money, employment contracts and real estate deals. In order for a contract to be valid, there must be a few elements that are satisfied. There must be a negotiation, an agreement which consists of an offer and acceptance of the offer, consideration, capacity, and legality. The sources of law that governs contracts today consist of two bodies of law, Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, also known as the UCC, and the common law of contracts. Determining what body of law applies to a contract dispute is an important first step in analyzing that problem. The Uniform Commercial Code, or UCC, is a statutory law that was adopted in every
The offeror is bound to fulfil the terms of his offer once it is accepted. The offer may be made in writing, by words or by conduct. Unilateral – some offers are purely one sided, made without the offeror’s having any idea whether they will ever be taken up and accepted, and thereby transformed into a contract. For example, when an advertisement where a person is rewarding another one if he finds his pet (which was lost). In this case, the person who is making such an offer is not sure whether this offer will ever be accepted.
One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)
This judgment given set criterion which is still been used in the modern court system and due to this case it was developed that an offer of contract can be unilateral and doesn’t have to be made to a specific party only. Also it was developed to that the acceptance of an offer does not require a notification and that once the concerned party purchases the product the contract is active then and there itself. And it was also established that purchase of an item is a fine example of consideration and therefore makes it a valid contract. (Smith, 2000).
A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,
Statutory law is an effective law because it has one of the most important elements on business that is called as Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). UCC is the element that U.S uses to gather states in order to make interesting the commerce among states. For example; Texas produces oil and it distributes to nearest states such as Louisiana and New Mexico. These two states also expand the product to other states around them and vice-versa. Statutory law is also effective because it clusters the commercial law, which is the law that is applied to the...
...ub principles of consideration, which is also known as one of the most important methodical processes of a formation of a contract. Overall, this may be seen as the essence of a legal contract, the exchange of consideration, which if excluded, will contain nothing more than an unenforceable promise.