Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Wealth in america
The role of income in inequality of distribution of wealth in america
Income inequality in the us paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Wealth in america
Unequal Taxing The United States of America is one of the richest countries in the world. In fact, we rank 9th in gross domestic output (Atlas), yet this is also the same country where too many working parents have to go without meals so that their children can eat, and families are often left deciding which bill they can actually afford to pay this month. With that being said, as a country, we also have some of the highest rates of income inequality of comparable developed nations (Radius TWC). It’s not that people are working less, on the contrary, Americans are now working twice as hard as previous generations, yet they are getting nowhere (Kornbluth). Income inequality does not just harm one person; income inequality hurts the entire …show more content…
Many argue that the issue of severely unequal taxation began with the Reagan administration in the 80s. Prior to Reagan’s shift to more conservative economic policies, the wealthiest percentage of Americans were taxed at an average rate of about 91% (Americans for Tax Fairness). As a result, the economy was able to maintain the economic boom following World War 2 up until the early 70s. However, after Reagan changed policies, the tax rate for the wealthy dropped from 74% to 38%. Unsurprisingly, following a surge in the markets, the economy suffered its most severe recession since the great depression under “Reaganomics” due to the severe cut in taxation in favor of the …show more content…
Consequently, limiting the spending capacity of the middle class damages the entire economy because it is the middle class that generates the most economic activity. For example, one wealthy person does not need to buy 5,000 new cars, but 5,000 families could certainly aid in stabilizing the auto-industry. Simply put, the extremely rich do not spend enough of their money to sustain an entire economic system. Unfortunately, the trend of lowering taxes for the rich continued under the next presidencies. Interestingly, under the Clinton administration, taxes on the rich were raised, and as a result, we saw the economy stabilize (Hartmann). However, under George Bush Jr., taxes on the rich were once again lowered. This time around, unearned income was now greatly untaxed as well. Lower taxes on unearned income is what enabled billionaires to only pay a 15% tax rate on federal taxes compared to the average American who could pay as much as 30%. Ergo, this cut in taxes led to yet another recession in 2008. Through these trends, we see that when the rich are paying their appropriate shares inequality due to recessions, for example, are generally at their
Immediately after being sworn into office, Reagan implemented the first of many tax cuts. The Economic Recovery Tax Act passed in 1981 took 20% off taxes from top income levels and 25% off taxes from all lower income levels. Additional tax cuts, enforced in 1986, lowered taxes for those with high incomes by another 28% and those with lower incomes by 15%. These cuts were enacted based on the principle that tax breaks for the upper echelon of society would encourage investment and spending, creating new jobs for lower income individuals. Though these acts helped America during an economic low, they had consequences which are still being felt today. During Reagan’s presidency the distribution of wealth shifted unfairly towards individuals...
Since 1980, America has experienced a quick and drastic change in income distribution between the top 1% and the rest of the country. The graphs below from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities show how tax policies implemented by the Reagan Administration have compounded over the past thirty-three years to create drastic income disparities.
Let's take it back to the past in regards to wealth distribution in this country. The fact is that the economy boomed from the end of WWII into the 1970's. “Incomes grew rapidly and at roughly the same rate up and down the income ladder, roughly doubling in inflation-adjusted terms between the late 1940s and early 1970s” (CBPP). Through the 70's economic growth slowed, and the wealth gap widened. Middle-class families were now considered lower class. People relied on the government to help them out with welfare programs. The middle-class class was weakened and the gap grew and grew. There were periods of positive fluctuation, however the middle-class simply never regained it's status that was held in more prosperous times in the past.
Robert Reich is on a mission to change the economic status of America. In his documentary Inequality for All he illuminates some of the loopholes in the US Government laws, as well as confirm and justify the increasing hardship the middle class is facing. He starts the discussion with the Suspension Bridge Effect. In the year 1978, the average American middle-class worker made about 48,302 dollars a year, while the average wage for the top one percent was 390,000 dollars a year. Fast forward to more recently 2010, the average middle-class worker wage drops to 30,000 dollars while the top one percent rises to about one million. Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty studied the IRS tax data from as far back as 1928. They found
David J Lynch says that, “ [s]ocieties that manage a narrower gap between rich and poor enjoy longer economic expansions”, however, in the United States the gap between the have and have-nots has widened (source C). “This country is just getting worse and worse and worse … and that is not a recipe for stable growth” (source C). If we do not do something soon our capitalist country will fall. In order for the income inequality gap to lessen to create a more stable economy the government must invest in education and unionize workers and not provide higher taxation for the top one percent.
Our economy does not serve the purpose that it was designed to do which is to provide decent wages to the hard workers and keep prices lower than the wages. I believe that Americans are kept in the dark about the income inequality so that the rich can keep getting richer while the working class remains at the bottom struggling to make ends meet at every paycheck.
Inside of this video, this guy really targets an issue nobody has really been presented. He shows charts that talk about how we Americans think our wealth is distributed. We think distribution is doing alright. Americans think that the bottom 40% is getting a bit of money. They also believe that the middle class is doing reasonably well. Unfortunately, that is not the case. In the video, he breaks it down a little bit getter. He shows a graph that shows how money is actually being distributed. The poorest of poor don 't even register on the poverty line. The middle class is barely making it. And then there is this huge difference between "the rich" and the poor. It is proven that the 1% of America has 40% of the entire nation 's wealth ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The bottom 80% of America only share 7% of the nation 's wealth among themselves. The top 1% has 50% of the stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. The bottom 50% of Americans only own 0.5% ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The poor is not just getting by but they are scraping and fighting to get by. Now that it is clear that there is a lot of poor people in America, it is important to figure out how to fix
The highest earning fifth of U.S. families earned 59.1% of all income, while the richest earned 88.9% of all wealth. A big gap between the rich and poor is often associated with low social mobility, which contradicts the American ideal of equal opportunity. Levels of income inequality are higher than they have been in almost a century, the top one percent has a share of the national income of over 20 percent (Wilhelm). There are a variety of factors that influence income inequality, a few of which will be discussed in this paper. Rising income inequality is caused by differences in life expectancy, rapidly increases in the incomes of the top 5 percent, social trends, and shifts in the global economy.
In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...
Between the end of World War II and the late 1970s, income inequality in the U.S. was reduced; but since 1970s, the situation with wealth distribution has changed. Data from tax returns in 1976 show that the top 1 percent of households received 8.9 percent of all pre-tax income. In 2008, the top 1 percent’s share had more than doubled to 21.0 percent.
3. What are the effects of this wealth inequality in the US and what causes it, as well as some possible solutions and their ramifications, will all be discussed and answered below. There has always been a wealth gap between the richest and poorest in society. However, in the past decade, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest citizens in the US has been growing rapidly. In the 70s and 80s, the wealth and income growth rate for both poor and rich people were similar, however, between the years 2009 and 2012 the top 1% income increased 31% while for the bottom 20%, their income actually dropped and for the vast majority of Americans, the average yearly income only increased by 0.4% [4].
The United States has often experienced a rise in inequality as the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, increasing the unstable gap between the two classes. The income gap in America has been increasing steadily since the late 1970’s, and has now reached historic highs not seen since the 1920’s (Desilver). UC Berkeley economics professor, Emmanuel Saez, conducted extensive research on past and present income inequality statistics and published them in his report “Striking it Richer.” Saez claims that changes in technology, tax policies, labor unions, corporate benefits, and social norms have caused income inequality. He stands to advocate a change in American economic policies that will help close this inequality gap and considers institutional and tax reforms that should be developed to counter it.
An average American is struggling while the rich people are getting richer. The wealth owned by the top 0.1 percent has increased by 22 percent in 2012 but in 1970 wealth owned by the top 0.1 percent was only 7 percent. The top 0.1 percent includes about 100,000 families with total money of more than $20 million in 2012. The unequal distribution money was all connected to the Great Depression that took place in 1929 to 1939. During 1920’s also known as “Roaring Twenties” people had more ideas and new invention due to industrial revolution and discovery of electricity that led to many new invention that people wanted and bought. The top 0.1 of population earned more what the bottom 42% people earned which led to unequal distribution of the money. Economics Inequality has increased since 1970’s due to many factors. Families who were already rich before in 1900’s their children just inherited the money. This case mostly applied to white families because back in in the day racism played a big factor for getting jobs. Another reason is that the top 25 percent are well paid government workers, politician, entrepreneurs, or have a really good investment in stocks. In United States, people favors rich people over poor so the rich people have more opportunities and a better future than a poor and that’s the reason why economics inequality has increased over
Income inequality has been a big factor for many years; Americans hold the wealthy, mostly responsible because of their irresponsible obligations of the economy, stimulated to some degree by rising inequality. Taxing the wealthy does not seem to be the most undeviating resolution to these problems, however putting the economy back on track through justifiable growth does. Americans support guideline laws, job development, fair pay, and education opportunities. Mostly Americans care about opportunities, previously stated, and not income inequality, which was the wrong route to go down. Inequality can itself twist incentives and limit opportunities. This income inequality eventually leads to recessions and depressions. The non-awareness of Americans for income inequality is from chasing opportunities that are not there instead of standardizing the income
Income inequality is a big problem in the United States because the top, wealthiest American saw huge increases in their incomes, which the rest had their incomes go down. Bottom people do not have the same amount of money and the opportunity to move up the social ladder as the rich people do. In order to reduce income inequality, the government needs to tax the rich people more, and give poor people more money and more social services - education, food subsidies, health care.