Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about financial literacy classes
Essay on importance of financial literacy
Essay about financial literacy classes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about financial literacy classes
David J Lynch says that, “ [s]ocieties that manage a narrower gap between rich and poor enjoy longer economic expansions”, however, in the United States the gap between the have and have-nots has widened (source C). “This country is just getting worse and worse and worse … and that is not a recipe for stable growth” (source C). If we do not do something soon our capitalist country will fall. In order for the income inequality gap to lessen to create a more stable economy the government must invest in education and unionize workers and not provide higher taxation for the top one percent. Throughout the years, “ U.S income inequality has been increasing steadily since the 1970s and now has reached levels not seen since 1928” (Source A). …show more content…
Though it is vital for the government to put some measures in place, some ideas are not the best ideas. For instance, high taxation on the wealthy. Some people claim that increasing taxes on the wealthy will “raise the top marginal tax rate and close tax loopholes that disproportionately favor the wealthy” (Source E). It may be true that it will close loopholes for the wealthy; however, “ heavy taxation and regulation will simply drive [the wealthy] to operate elsewhere [leading to] a huge net loss to the country” (Source D). This means that the country will get poorer and in more debt from importing goods from the companies that left, thus, the government will have to raise taxes, which will take money from the poor and what little middle class we have left. Without the free reign of the capitalist society, America would not be America. Their are however things the government can do to lower the income gap without putting consequences on the …show more content…
The best thing the gonvornment can do is invest in education, because “[m]ore financial education in public schools is a must” (Source H). Children should learn how to do the “basic Suze Orman stuff “ like “how to make a monthly budget” and “ what saving and barrowing mean“ and “how wealth builds over time” ( Source H). If we do this people can learn at a younger age how to handle their money and be responsible. In order for this to work the gonvornment must allow the schools to teach to the individual because students learn differently. They also need to allow the teachers to teach to the students the way the students learn which will make a better educated person and a better class of
Stone, Chad, Danilo Trisi, Arloc Sherman, and William Chen. "Center on Budget and Policy Priorities." A Guide to Statistics on Historical Trends in Income Inequality. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 6 Nov. 2013. Web. 03 Dec. 2013. .
“A Guide to Statistics on Historical Trends in Income Inequality.” cbpp.org. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2013. Web. 06 April. 2014. .
David Autor definitely agrees with the statements of Proposition #2 by acknowledging that much of the income gap is a result of lack of education, low minimum wage and the bargaining power of labor unions among other things, all of which are a result of purposeful policy that has favored wealthy people at the expense of the poor. Autor discussed the inequality in classes and the income gap that has arisen between the upper 1% and the rest of modern society in recent years and exactly why that happened. As the majority of the economy’s jobs have moved away from the agricultural and industrial areas in the last 100-150 years, skills and education have become much more vital as careers as doctors, lawyers and other professional fields have become higher demanded and therefore more available. The entry into college has become even more vital for people to sustain jobs or even get one in the first place so the upper middle class who can afford to go to college profit, while the lower end of the 99 percent suffer because they can’t afford to pay for college which leads to a higher standard of living. Events such as the Vietnam War pushed more people who could afford it to enter college and artificially raised the national percentage of college students because this allowed them to evade the draft and avoid military
Desilver, Drew. “U.S. Income inequality, On Rise for Decades, Is Now Highest Since 1928.” Pew Research Center RSS. N.p. 30 Dec. 2010.Web. 30Apr. 2014.
Wealth inequality is a real issue that needs to be fixed. The imbalanced growth of the upper class compared to the middle class is a danger to American society as a whole. The rich becoming richer while the middle class remains the same leads to a power imbalance, with the rich using their money to run the country the way they see fit while the middle class speaks to ears that do not listen. The issue of wealth inequality needs to be fixed by raising taxes on the rich.
Americans have financially and politically. Much of the financial gains made today go to the top one percent of earners in the United States. This increase in inequality has grown substantially in the last forty years. Wage inequality is different than the push for equal pay. According to Fortune.com, the salaries of CEO’s compared to the average worker are 300 times more (Addady 1). One of the reasons CEO’s are profiting more money is because technological advances are replacing human labor with robots or software. This investment in technology by firms increases the bottom line and is ever more important with the rising minimum wages set by local, state, and federal
Between the end of World War II and the late 1970s, income inequality in the U.S. was reduced; but since 1970s, the situation with wealth distribution has changed. Data from tax returns in 1976 show that the top 1 percent of households received 8.9 percent of all pre-tax income. In 2008, the top 1 percent’s share had more than doubled to 21.0 percent.
Income inequality in the United States, as of 2007, has reached levels not seen since 1928. In 1928, the top one percent received nearly 24% of all income within the United States (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). This percentage fell to nearly nine percent in 1975, but has risen to 23.5% as of 2007 (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). Meanwhile, in 2007 (see
3. What are the effects of this wealth inequality in the US and what causes it, as well as some possible solutions and their ramifications, will all be discussed and answered below. There has always been a wealth gap between the richest and poorest in society. However, in the past decade, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest citizens in the US has been growing rapidly. In the 70s and 80s, the wealth and income growth rate for both poor and rich people were similar, however, between the years 2009 and 2012 the top 1% income increased 31% while for the bottom 20%, their income actually dropped and for the vast majority of Americans, the average yearly income only increased by 0.4% [4].
Frank, Robert H. “Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore.” They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter
Is Inequality in America really as bad as we perceive it? In America, we have many people discussing back and forth on the issue of inequality. Some people claim that inequality is a rapidly growing phenomenon, separating the rich from the poor. Though, other Americans claim that we’re progressing and departing away from inequality. However, the way in which we choose to perceive inequality is our choice, but we cannot ignore the fact that it exist. Inequality is an issue that has been constantly debated in the past, and will continue to be debated, so long as we do not put an end to it. Inequality is changing our country. The people who enjoy higher social statuses are spending their money with no limitations, whereas the people in the lower
Desilver, Drew. “U.S. Income Inequality, On The Rise…” Pew Research Center. 5 Dec. 2013. Web. 12 Feb. 2014.
Income inequality continues to increase in today’s world, especially in the United States. Income inequality means the unequal distribution between individuals’ assets, wealth, or income. In the Twilight of the Elites, Christopher Hayes, a liberal journalist, states the inequality gap between the rich and the poor are increasing widening, and there need to have things done - tax the rich, provide better education - in order to shortening the inequality gap. America is a meritocratic country, which means that everybody has equal opportunity to be successful regardless of their class privileges or wealth. However, equality of opportunity does not equal equality of outcomes. People are having more opportunities to find a better job, but their incomes are a lot less compared to the top ten percent rich people. In this way, the poor people will never climb up the ladder to high status and become millionaires. Therefore, the government needs to increase all the tax rates on rich people in order to reduce income inequality.
However, as one has finally entered college, you become more observant of the workforce and lifestyle of many around the world. Today kids are still living with mom and dad, they have no job, and no intentions of going to school or even doing good in school. People around the world have the latest and greatest clothes and technology, yet they can’t seem to afford food or a roof over their head. The governments solution to this problem is let them impose a greater tax on the rich, so those who can’t afford the necessities of life are simply handed these items. While this is fabulous for those who are poor, it is imposturous for those who have worked hard all their life. People who have worked hard have rightfully earned all that they have worked for. The government is teaching lower class American’s that its okay to sit on their butts all day and not go out and get a job, because someone else will ultimately cover that cost for you. In a perfect society, everyone earns what you deserve. You can’t sit around and do nothing and expect the essentials and great things of life to be handed to
The government would most likely do this by raising taxes for the rich to fund social programs or by forcefully increasing minimum wage. Due to the growth in distance between the rich and the poor in the world I mostly agree with the source however, if the government 's power is not limited they could make the economy worse.