Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Protesting the national anthem pros
NFL anthem protest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Protesting the national anthem pros
According to recent news, the Houston Texans are ‘not interested’ in players who protested during the national anthem. According to Houston Chronicle columnist Jerome Solomon who spoke with two NFL agents Saturday “who said word is the Texans aren’t interested in any players who participated in pregame kneel-downs in protest of police brutality.” “There is no directive within the organization, but it is considered to be understood that as desperate as the Texans are to bring in talent, the pool of potential signees and draftees will not include anyone who has participated in protests or are likely to,” Solomon continued. He added that while the Texans aren’t a racist organization, the team’s owner has frequently been “racially tone deaf,”
and there are “many who believe if McNair could field a team with all-white, all-conforming all-pro talent, he would.” According to the Bleacher Report, McNair came under fire last October when he said the league and owners “can’t have the inmates running the prison,” referring to the ongoing anthem protests. McNair subsequently apologized and said in a statement he “never meant to offend anyone” and “was not referring to our players.” The Texans have issued a report denying the report, stating “A recent report suggests the Houston Texans would not sign a player who has protested in of social justice issues is categorically false and without merit. The Texans ownership, coaching, personnel, and executive staff sign and hire employees based on talent, character and fit within our organization.”
In the past few years, the controversy over Native American and other racial sport names or mascots have become an uproar. The main sport teams that are being targeted due to controversial mascots are programs having names dealing with Native Americans. Many teams are well known programs such as the Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians, and the Washington Redskins. The Redskins are receiving the most heat from racial groups. According to Erik Brady of USA Today “The volatility surrounding such names has amped up in the year since Daniel Snyder, owner of Washington's NFL club, told USA TODAY Sports that he'd never change his team's name: ‘NEVER — you can use caps.’” (3). However, professional teams are not the only teams receiving negative remarks,
In her article “From America’s New Working Class”, Kathleen R. Arnold makes clear that welfare/workfare recipients are treated like prisoners or second class citizens. Likewise, In Michelle Alexander’s article “The New Jim Crow” she describes how blacks is made criminals by a corrupt criminal justice system. Alexander also points out in her article “The New Jim Crow” that shackles and chains are not the only form of slavery. Furthermore, Alexander states that although America is thought of as the home of the free, blacks are more likely than any other race to be arrested, unemployed, or denied housing. Freedom is not an absolute value in America, as slavery is more ubiquitous than ever.
Firstly, one cannot place blame solely on side of the negations as the player’s union has declined potential offers themselves. However, the owners are the ones whom opted out of the Collective Bargaining Agreement near its expiration. This is different from when the players and their union decide to strike. This would have indicated the players have stopped trying. Yet, this is clearly not the case in the NFL. At one point before the owners opted out of the CBA, the player’s union had asked to see the owner’s financial books as money was among the greatest topic of these negotiations. The owners refused to do so and were adamant that their team finances where not valuable to the fair negotiation of a new Collective Bargaining Agreement. These owners clearly want a “fight” and are too stubborn to back down from their “wall” of money that protects them. While on th...
There is considerable controversy that dates back to the 1960’s over sports teams’ names that reference Native American heritage. “The National Congress of American Indiana’s (NCIA) created a campaign in 1968 to eliminate stereotypes found in print and other media.” (ChangeTheMascot.org). The American Indian community has worked for many years to abolish the right to use Native American Names, spiritual and cultural symbols by professional sports teams (Teters) that they feel offensive. The Washington Redskins football team continues to battle a long standing controversy to change their name. Native Americans, politicians, fans of American football, as well as the general public all seem to have opposing viewpoints regarding if this team should be forced to change their name out of respect to those offended.
Times have changed - what was acceptable 30 years ago may not hold up in today’s world. Racially offensive mascots have created division - not unity. If teams like the Indians, Braves and Redskins were to change their names and update their branding, they could potentially benefit more than by holding on to offensive, outdated traditions. Why would a professional sports organization settle for fewer fans, less revenue, and an image that offends its own citizens? By...
Gregory Lee Johnson was among the people who were participating in the political demonstration to protest the policies of the President Ronald Reagan administration. During the march, Johnson burned an American flag; neither he nor others were hurt during the protest and burning of the flag. After Johnson publicly burnt the American flag, he was arrested and convicted of desecrating a flag in violation of Texas law. The court of Criminal Appeals overturned his conviction after the Supreme Court found that Texas law was unconstitutional.
complaint and the employee follows the process the organization will be liable even if a
Texas is considered a colossal state with a great potential. Students from grades K-12 even through college, under all conditions, suffer greatly on school necessities like supplies, college loans, or possibly even transportation ways. Students up in northern states have it easy on how their parents can support their needs because the fact that the economy is so much better than down in the south.
Women working in the Texas state government suffer wage inequality because all women carry the expectation that they will leave work to have a baby. Women determine whether they will or will not have kids, but even though their colleagues do plan on having kids or are pregnant, they all have the same designated pay. When hiring women employers have a doubt that they will stay the entire time and that it will be a permanent job so the employer does not feel a need to give them an equal pay compared to a man doing the same job.
Today in America the word Racism is taken to a whole new level. Even in sports, such as the NFL racism prospers. For instance the Washington Redskins of the National Football League. Native Americans are trying to say the NFL is being rude for naming a Team Redskins. The Redskins have had that name since 1933 (Staff). The team had the name of Braves before they adopted the name Redskins. It was changed due to racism purposes. Some people would agree that the whole situation with Redskins is ridiculous because The Major League Baseball series has two teams related to Native Americans, The Atlanta Braves and The Cleveland Indians. The NFL also has more than just Redskins. They have the Kansas City Chiefs. So if they are really worried about total racism why isn’t the Chiefs in on this conversation?
This the same NFL that handled the Ray Rice domestic abuse case back in 2014 fairly quickly in a time when most knew that it was done exceedingly quick to save face and not tarnish the reputation of the league in the public eye. The current case of New York Giants kicker Josh Brown deserves the same amount of expeditious action.
After looking at the three articles, I can see that the NFL players should stand during the national anthem. When these players refuse to stand, they are not only disrespecting the flag, but they are also disrespecting the people who gave their lives for our country (Junior Scholastic). The kneeling during the National Anthem is for a “Black Lives Matter” protest started by Colin Kaepernick, former San Francisco 49ers player. These players need to realize that there are better ways and better places to express their side of the protest. If it states that players need to stand for the National Anthem, they need to do it. Either they stand, or they don’t play during the game.
Kaepernick is protesting because he feels like the American flag does not represent what it is supposed to represent. One way he is protesting is he wears socks that say police are pigs. He wears them because he says there are rouge cops that do not treat black people the same way they treat white people and they are also putting the community
Although some do not agree with Kaepernick’s belief, many still support his decision to kneel during the national anthem for the reason that he was simply doing what he believed was right, which is what most are taught to do. In today’s
In the beginning of the protests, many NFL players were criticized by President Donald Trump. He declared that