Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parent involvement in education
Parenting styles assignment
Parent involvement in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parent involvement in education
Childhoods are affected by the socio-economic class that created two distinct child-rearing approaches: converted cultivation and accomplishment of natural growth. In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau participated in one of the earliest longitudinal study on the distinct influence of socio-economic class in the experience of a child’s life. Compared to the parents’ development of the accomplished of natural growth, converted cultivation is a new term that establishes an advantage for the entitled middle-class children than their working class and poor class counterparts in society. Both working class’ and poor class’ parents’ utilize the accomplishments of natural growth naturally approach. Most mothers repeatedly …show more content…
Prioritization in converted cultivation parents revolves around their children’s extracurricular activities. Unlike parents in the working-class and poor class, annual income and flexibility allow the access to a variety of activities in and outside of school. Garret Tallinger is a fourth grader who is involved in intercounty soccer team, a private soccer team, swim team, and piano lessons. Both of his parents have maintained resources to hiring a nanny, maintain multiple vehicles for transportation, and a stable finance to pay for each activity. Nevertheless, these youths develop an attachment to their parents to maintain and monitor their activities. In contrast, children like Katie Brindle in the other two lower social class evolve an early and strong autonomy through their own search initiatives. Of course, finances create these opportunities, but a majority of parents in the lower class believe that it is the children’s responsibility to find activities. Some may argue that this sense of entitlement creates irresponsible individuals. Yet, middle-class children are more likely to succeed because of their ability to balance and adapt to various organizations at a young age. Converted cultivation easily has advantages in the arrangement of ‘leisure time’ kids have outside academics and their language
In the article The American Dream: Slipping Away? by Susan Neuman I found many things interesting to read, some even shocking. When Neuman speaks about a study done that found that middle and upper middle class families use a child-rearing strategy called concerted cultivation while working-class and poor parents use the strategy of natural growth, I realized that my mother definitely used natural growth. Neuman states, “These parents generally have less education and time to impress on their children the values that will give them an advantage in school. Their children often spend less time in the company of adults and more time with other children in self-directed, open-ended play” (pp. 166).
The education of privileged children was all about preparing boys for their future career. Members of the affluent society always wanted to send their childr...
In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau discussed the extensive amount of research she conducted employing observational and interview techniques. She collected data on the middle class, working class, and poor families. She was trying to understand the impact of a child’s early parental guidance on the child’s life. She was able to conduct this research with 12 families, all of whom had fourth graders. She gathered enough information to conclude the major differences in the parenting styles of each type of family, which was directly correlated to socioeconomic status. Annette Lareau opens her book with two chapters to give the reader an idea on what the examples she gives will detail.
After reading “Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black families and White Families,” by Annette Lareau, it was evident that she collected much data from her study of different types of families. In this study with the help of other sociologists, Lareau went into the lives of both black and white middle class and working class/ poor families. In her study she observed the behavior of children at home, school, and in the public eye. She observed the parenting methods the adults chose to use and the child’s reaction to them. Lareau and her team were able to see what influences certain factors such as income, race, family size, home location, schooling, and career choices had on each family and their children. The purpose of this study as well as the central argument is very well addressed by Lareau in the text and leads to many well supported conclusions.
Staff writer at The New Yorker since 1999, Elizabeth Kolbert, in her essay, “Spoiled Rotten”, distinguishes the differences between child behaviors of children of other cultures to children of America’s culture. She establishes a forthright tone in an attempt to educate and instruct the readers about how American children are more spoiled than those of other countries. Kolbert’s purpose is to further develop her idea, by using ethos, pathos, and logos, that modern and societal children have become spoiled through their adopted habits such as when their parents: raise them to be dependent rather than independent, strain from using restrictions, and worry more about their child having a strong college education than being a well-rounded, skillful
The theme in working and poor class parents is that they are not as attentive to their kids as middle class parents are. However, this does not mean that they do not love their kids. It is just a different approach to development. This ties back into the major concept Lareau: concerted cultivation or natural growth. Working and poor class parents adopt a “let kids be kids” mentality and do not intervene as much. Middle class parents are very involved in their kids’ lives by enrolling them in various activities, but because of hectic schedules they to do not have a great deal of down time to spend together as a
There are two approach of Childrearing in different social classes include, concerted cultivation and the accomplishment of natural growth. Middle class parents emphasize of concerted cultivation’s strategy of childrearing. On the other hand, working class and poor family parents emphasize of natural growth’s strategy of childrearing. In fact, differences of social classes play a significant role in family life and childrearing. In this paper, I would like to discuss the differences in parenting styles that described in the article “Invisible Inequality” by A. Lareau, beside to analysis the incorporation of a system-lifeworld from Habermas’ theory.
With higher class comes a distinct parenting style referred to as “concerted cultivation”. Gladwell highlights this advantage with the implementation of ethos, using expert sociologist Annette Lareau. Lareau elaborates on how concerted cultivation is “an attempt to actively foster and assess a child’s talents, opinions and skills” (Lines 14-15).
In early America, socio-economic class, agriculture, religion and gender played four very important roles in regional distinctions of this newly developing country. Even though agriculture, religion, and gender were extremely important, the biggest factor was socio-economic life. A person’s socio economic class was what determined their life style from a wealth, treatment, and dress style and home, which are major aspects of human life. In Everyday Life in Early America, David Freeman Hawke explains how each of these four factors determined the life style of each early resident of America as well as the overall development of the country in its beginning years to emerge into a growing and improving nation (continue)
First, Lareau’s study shows that children from families of lower SES are more likely to exhibit a far higher sense of constraint than those from families of higher SES who are far more likely to exhibit a higher sense of entitlement. “Middle-class children expect institutions to be responsive to them and to accommodate their individual needs. By contrast…[the working class] are being given lessons in frustration and powerlessness” (Lareau, 771). This quote shows clearly how differently these two groups of children are seeing the world due to the class they were born into. Next, if your family has a low SES, chances are high that your parents do not have the types of connections others may. There is no “Jim from college,” who works for CBS; no “my father’s friend, Jane,” who is a partner at a law firm. This can make hurdles especially hard, such as applying to schools or trying to get a first job. Although my family is of a higher class, neither of my parents attended college. When it came time to start looking at schools, I had already begun homeschooling and had no resources outside of my immediate family, and we were flying blind – or at least, we would have been had we not been able to hire a counselor to assist me. We counteracted the disadvantage the resulted from both of my parents coming from lower-class families by utilizing wealth they now possess. If my parents were
In American society today, childhood is considered a time for learning, exploration, and a chance for a child to make his or her mark on the world. Leading up to the Great Depression, however, childhood for working class children was seen in a different light. Working class children felt pressure to provide for their family, which inhibited them from getting an education and branching out on their own, while middle class children had a greater prospect for education because of the difference in wealth. The Great Depression brought hard times for all Americans and expanded the working class while shrinking the middle class. Because the working class children held close ties and responsibilities to their families and faced more poverty than the middle class, they had a lesser chance to move out of the working class as they had a commitment to work to support their families, or children without families had to support themselves, and had dimmer opportunities for education.
Having a family of low socioeconomic status inevitably leaves me to reside in a low-income neighborhood which makes it more likely for me to witness the tragedies, adversities and hardships that people go through [not excluding myself]. Being conscious of this kind of environment, and these kinds of events, creates a pressure on me for having the aim to achieve social mobility in order to escape the aforementioned environment so that my own children could witness one less abominable aspect of life. Moreover, my family’s low socioeconomic status does not authorize me the privilege of being raised with the concerted cultivation method that kids of high socioeconomic status are more prone to being raised in. My family did not have the financial resources that granted us access to extra classes or lessons of instrumental classes, swimming practices, karate practices, or any other extracurricular activities that people of high socioeconomic status would be able to afford. This invisible fence that prevents me from these extracurricular activities enables me to having more appreciation towards the hobbies and talents that other people have. Plus, the fact that my family’s low socioeconomic status acts as a barrier from enjoying expensive luxuries in life creates a yearning [in me] to enjoy them later on in my life, in addition to acting as the fuel to my wish of achieving social mobility in anticipation of providing my own children with the luxurious vacations, gadgets, beachhouse, new cars that I could not
Compared to people in the twenty-first century, with all their modern conveniences and technological advances, the life of any early-American seems difficult. However, the lives of children were among the most arduous. Linda Pollock states in her book Forgotten Children that between 1660 and 1800 families -and society in general- became more affectionate, child-oriented, and permissive of uniqueness and unstructured time (67). Although this may be true, many other sources depict the lives of children as taxing and oppressive at best. Children of the time were either forced to abandon education for their family contributions, or had to balance school with a full day's work ("Education"). Even when they were not in school or doing manual labor, their day-to-day lives were uncomfortable and harsh (Kids). Social status, as is expected, was a key factor in determining how hard a child's life would be (Murray 9). Although many children at the time had it easier than others they were all asked at an early age to take on adult responsibilities. The lives of all children in 1800 were mundane and difficult due to family and societal expectations for labor, schooling, and maturity.
Class is something that is often defined by ones income, job, and family background, the area in which they live or indeed the schools or universities they have chosen to attended. This criteria is used to label people as a certain class and is something that can be seen in education through the likes of theories such as cultural capital. In this essay I am going to compare and contrast differences between middle and working class experiences of education focusing on two main theories; Cultural capital and social reproduction. I am going to concentrate upon the primary sector in oppose to secondary or higher education due to the fact I believe that primary school is where most children develop their personalities which they carry with them in further life and it is their first academic experience; therefore it is where social class first becomes clearly noticeable. In relation to these theories I am going to research into the argument that parents have a strong influence on their child’s education from this young age.
When an individual thinks of development they undoubtedly consider the core aspects that impact how a child develops, for example the genomic and the individual uniqueness that makes us, us. Yet, growth and development encompasses considerable amount more than just the core aspects that are engrained within each individual child. Environmental influences such as interactions with peers and our cultural influences are extremely essential to our growth. Interactions with peers as shown in the movie My Girl between Vada and her best friend Thomas J, as well interactions adults as displayed in the movie between Vada and her father all have an effect on how an adolescent reasons, learns and grows. The environment a child is exposed to contribute as well to their set of morals, customs, expectations and their way of life that effects growth through their lifetime. Socioeconomic status plays a huge part in adolescent growth and development. Socioeconomic status (SES), includes a number of factors; the amount of education a child has, the amount of money they earn, and where they and live. All of these factors