Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parent involvement in education
Parenting styles assignment
Parent involvement in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parent involvement in education
Childhoods are affected by the socio-economic class that created two distinct child-rearing approaches: converted cultivation and accomplishment of natural growth. In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau participated in one of the earliest longitudinal study on the distinct influence of socio-economic class in the experience of a child’s life. Compared to the parents’ development of the accomplished of natural growth, converted cultivation is a new term that establishes an advantage for the entitled middle-class children than their working class and poor class counterparts in society. Both working class’ and poor class’ parents’ utilize the accomplishments of natural growth naturally approach. Most mothers repeatedly …show more content…
Prioritization in converted cultivation parents revolves around their children’s extracurricular activities. Unlike parents in the working-class and poor class, annual income and flexibility allow the access to a variety of activities in and outside of school. Garret Tallinger is a fourth grader who is involved in intercounty soccer team, a private soccer team, swim team, and piano lessons. Both of his parents have maintained resources to hiring a nanny, maintain multiple vehicles for transportation, and a stable finance to pay for each activity. Nevertheless, these youths develop an attachment to their parents to maintain and monitor their activities. In contrast, children like Katie Brindle in the other two lower social class evolve an early and strong autonomy through their own search initiatives. Of course, finances create these opportunities, but a majority of parents in the lower class believe that it is the children’s responsibility to find activities. Some may argue that this sense of entitlement creates irresponsible individuals. Yet, middle-class children are more likely to succeed because of their ability to balance and adapt to various organizations at a young age. Converted cultivation easily has advantages in the arrangement of ‘leisure time’ kids have outside academics and their language
The theme in working and poor class parents is that they are not as attentive to their kids as middle class parents are. However, this does not mean that they do not love their kids. It is just a different approach to development. This ties back into the major concept Lareau: concerted cultivation or natural growth. Working and poor class parents adopt a “let kids be kids” mentality and do not intervene as much. Middle class parents are very involved in their kids’ lives by enrolling them in various activities, but because of hectic schedules they to do not have a great deal of down time to spend together as a
In the article The American Dream: Slipping Away? by Susan Neuman I found many things interesting to read, some even shocking. When Neuman speaks about a study done that found that middle and upper middle class families use a child-rearing strategy called concerted cultivation while working-class and poor parents use the strategy of natural growth, I realized that my mother definitely used natural growth. Neuman states, “These parents generally have less education and time to impress on their children the values that will give them an advantage in school. Their children often spend less time in the company of adults and more time with other children in self-directed, open-ended play” (pp. 166).
Although it may not occur often Lareau fails to gives examples of different social classes using the opposite parenting style that is expected. Not every family is the same. In this book, every middle and upper middle class family focused on concerted cultivation and every working and lower class families focused on accomplishment of natural growth as their parenting styles. The book shows absolutely no example of a working or lower class families that raise their children under the concerted cultivation parenting styles and vice versa. From a personal standpoint, I was raised in the middle class and according to these two parenting styles it is likely that I will be raised in a concerted cultivation environment but in reality I was raised with a mix of concerted cultivation and accomplishment of natural growth with more of an emphasis on accomplishment of natural growth. There are most likely many other families that may mix these two parenting styles together or use the one that is not commonly associated with their social class and Lareau failed to also represent those families in her
Having a family of low socioeconomic status inevitably leaves me to reside in a low-income neighborhood which makes it more likely for me to witness the tragedies, adversities and hardships that people go through [not excluding myself]. Being conscious of this kind of environment, and these kinds of events, creates a pressure on me for having the aim to achieve social mobility in order to escape the aforementioned environment so that my own children could witness one less abominable aspect of life. Moreover, my family’s low socioeconomic status does not authorize me the privilege of being raised with the concerted cultivation method that kids of high socioeconomic status are more prone to being raised in. My family did not have the financial resources that granted us access to extra classes or lessons of instrumental classes, swimming practices, karate practices, or any other extracurricular activities that people of high socioeconomic status would be able to afford. This invisible fence that prevents me from these extracurricular activities enables me to having more appreciation towards the hobbies and talents that other people have. Plus, the fact that my family’s low socioeconomic status acts as a barrier from enjoying expensive luxuries in life creates a yearning [in me] to enjoy them later on in my life, in addition to acting as the fuel to my wish of achieving social mobility in anticipation of providing my own children with the luxurious vacations, gadgets, beachhouse, new cars that I could not
...oming to an understanding of the daily struggles of every person, who attempts to raise a child in the American society. Inferring from the book, the extent to which the scholar discusses race as a key influence of childhood inequality is not as extended as that of social class. This is clear evidence that the Lareau dwells much on social class as the principal and prevalent theme in the American society towards parenting and child bearing (4). Indeed, at some point, Lareau reports that while race produces childhood inequality, most outcomes for children, from interactions to education, largely depends with social stratification (4). Therefore, she discusses that social class is more influential in relation to race.
With higher class comes a distinct parenting style referred to as “concerted cultivation”. Gladwell highlights this advantage with the implementation of ethos, using expert sociologist Annette Lareau. Lareau elaborates on how concerted cultivation is “an attempt to actively foster and assess a child’s talents, opinions and skills” (Lines 14-15).
There are two approach of Childrearing in different social classes include, concerted cultivation and the accomplishment of natural growth. Middle class parents emphasize of concerted cultivation’s strategy of childrearing. On the other hand, working class and poor family parents emphasize of natural growth’s strategy of childrearing. In fact, differences of social classes play a significant role in family life and childrearing. In this paper, I would like to discuss the differences in parenting styles that described in the article “Invisible Inequality” by A. Lareau, beside to analysis the incorporation of a system-lifeworld from Habermas’ theory.
In early America, socio-economic class, agriculture, religion and gender played four very important roles in regional distinctions of this newly developing country. Even though agriculture, religion, and gender were extremely important, the biggest factor was socio-economic life. A person’s socio economic class was what determined their life style from a wealth, treatment, and dress style and home, which are major aspects of human life. In Everyday Life in Early America, David Freeman Hawke explains how each of these four factors determined the life style of each early resident of America as well as the overall development of the country in its beginning years to emerge into a growing and improving nation (continue)
Louie, Vivian. 2001. “Parents’ Aspirations and Investment: The Role of Social Class in the Educational
The education of privileged children was all about preparing boys for their future career. Members of the affluent society always wanted to send their childr...
In American society today, childhood is considered a time for learning, exploration, and a chance for a child to make his or her mark on the world. Leading up to the Great Depression, however, childhood for working class children was seen in a different light. Working class children felt pressure to provide for their family, which inhibited them from getting an education and branching out on their own, while middle class children had a greater prospect for education because of the difference in wealth. The Great Depression brought hard times for all Americans and expanded the working class while shrinking the middle class. Because the working class children held close ties and responsibilities to their families and faced more poverty than the middle class, they had a lesser chance to move out of the working class as they had a commitment to work to support their families, or children without families had to support themselves, and had dimmer opportunities for education.
First, Lareau’s study shows that children from families of lower SES are more likely to exhibit a far higher sense of constraint than those from families of higher SES who are far more likely to exhibit a higher sense of entitlement. “Middle-class children expect institutions to be responsive to them and to accommodate their individual needs. By contrast…[the working class] are being given lessons in frustration and powerlessness” (Lareau, 771). This quote shows clearly how differently these two groups of children are seeing the world due to the class they were born into. Next, if your family has a low SES, chances are high that your parents do not have the types of connections others may. There is no “Jim from college,” who works for CBS; no “my father’s friend, Jane,” who is a partner at a law firm. This can make hurdles especially hard, such as applying to schools or trying to get a first job. Although my family is of a higher class, neither of my parents attended college. When it came time to start looking at schools, I had already begun homeschooling and had no resources outside of my immediate family, and we were flying blind – or at least, we would have been had we not been able to hire a counselor to assist me. We counteracted the disadvantage the resulted from both of my parents coming from lower-class families by utilizing wealth they now possess. If my parents were
When an individual thinks of development they undoubtedly consider the core aspects that impact how a child develops, for example the genomic and the individual uniqueness that makes us, us. Yet, growth and development encompasses considerable amount more than just the core aspects that are engrained within each individual child. Environmental influences such as interactions with peers and our cultural influences are extremely essential to our growth. Interactions with peers as shown in the movie My Girl between Vada and her best friend Thomas J, as well interactions adults as displayed in the movie between Vada and her father all have an effect on how an adolescent reasons, learns and grows. The environment a child is exposed to contribute as well to their set of morals, customs, expectations and their way of life that effects growth through their lifetime. Socioeconomic status plays a huge part in adolescent growth and development. Socioeconomic status (SES), includes a number of factors; the amount of education a child has, the amount of money they earn, and where they and live. All of these factors
Class is something that is often defined by ones income, job, and family background, the area in which they live or indeed the schools or universities they have chosen to attended. This criteria is used to label people as a certain class and is something that can be seen in education through the likes of theories such as cultural capital. In this essay I am going to compare and contrast differences between middle and working class experiences of education focusing on two main theories; Cultural capital and social reproduction. I am going to concentrate upon the primary sector in oppose to secondary or higher education due to the fact I believe that primary school is where most children develop their personalities which they carry with them in further life and it is their first academic experience; therefore it is where social class first becomes clearly noticeable. In relation to these theories I am going to research into the argument that parents have a strong influence on their child’s education from this young age.
Staff writer at The New Yorker since 1999, Elizabeth Kolbert, in her essay, “Spoiled Rotten”, distinguishes the differences between child behaviors of children of other cultures to children of America’s culture. She establishes a forthright tone in an attempt to educate and instruct the readers about how American children are more spoiled than those of other countries. Kolbert’s purpose is to further develop her idea, by using ethos, pathos, and logos, that modern and societal children have become spoiled through their adopted habits such as when their parents: raise them to be dependent rather than independent, strain from using restrictions, and worry more about their child having a strong college education than being a well-rounded, skillful