Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Under armour case study conclusion
Under armour case study answers
Under armour case study answers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Under armour case study conclusion
1. The competitive forces are very strong coming from rival sellers in the same business, and the demand for the products are high in the marketplace. Under Armour have various competition from rival sellers, such as Nike and Adidas who usually sell under the same classification as them. They are producing selling similar products and they usually have the same features, which cause a weakened differentiation among them. It could also be caused by low switching costs that make it even more competitive. The only thing difference about them is the brand and how they market it.
The competitive force may be moderate coming from potential new entrants in the industry. The demand is already high for current brands and trends, and the new competition would have to spend a lot more money to market their products in order to level with the current
…show more content…
competitors. Since they are technically distributing similar products, there is not much differentiation between them, so they would have a harder time breaking barriers to reach the top. The competitive force may be strong coming from producers of similar products.
Even though the products are similar, quality and price is important to customers when choosing which brand to buy. In order to keep their loyal customers, they have to prove to them that they could provide inferior quality and come up with new ideas for designs that would keep them interested. Under The brand has to strive to be better than the other rivalries in order to successful in an industry like this.
The competitive force may be moderate coming from supplier bargaining power. Items are supplied from many different supplies, and many industries switch their purchases from one supplier to another at times. When there is diversity in suppliers, it limits the bargaining power.
The competitive force may be moderate coming from customer bargaining power also. There are any other brands a customer could choose from. The customer wants to make sure they are getting good quality for the price they are paying for them. The materials the brand uses is a very important factor in determining if the quality of the product is what the customer
demands. 2. Under Amour definitely have core competencies to provide great quality to their customer for a reasonable price. They offer a variety of products for people of al ages and sizes. Their products range from things like clothes, shoes, and accessories for men and women. They stay innovative in order to keep up with the latest trends that their customers are looking for. They have expanded worldwide and have made their brand available to many different markets 3. Yes, they have resource strengths of provide a wide range of diverse products in many different countries. They have many difference suppliers and customers from all over the world. They also have competitive capabilities that qualify as distinctive competence. For example, their products could be used for multiple purposes, and does not just have one advantage. Athletes usually endorse their brand and they also have very comfortable apparel for them to wear. 4. The SWOT analysis evaluates strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Under Armor’s strengths are having a strong brand, great sponsorships and endorsement by celebrities, attractive and great quality products, and great profits. Their weaknesses are competitive prices compared to other brands. Also, their advertising targets more athletes who play sports, rather than regular customers who may use their products to just work out or wear their casual apparel daily. They have plenty of opportunities to lower price to better compete with rivals and raise profits. They should also expand to more markets and open more retail stores with their brand. The threats that they could face are having better competition with better prices, products that substitute their brand, or a fall in stock prices. 5. The key elements of Under Armor’s strategy are growth strategy, product line strategy, distribution strategy, and the marketing/promotion/brand management strategy. Their growth strategy broadened the products to a wide variety of sports, targeted additional consumers for their performance line-up, increased the sales and market share, secured additional distributions in the market, expanded their products to different countries, and increased global awareness. Their product line strategy expanded and marketed products offerings to provide their customers with a product that was superior alternative to their rivals. Their distribution strategy made their products available in over 25000 retail stores and sold products directly from its own factory and outlets. Their marketing, promotion, and brand management strategy drove consumer demand and built awareness for its products. 6. Under Armor is more than likely employing the Broad Differentiation strategy. They are trying to create unique products that would set them apart from other competitors. They do this by creating products that would be difficult to duplicate so they could have an advantage over their rivals. 7. The most impressive thing is that the overall net income and revenues increased every year, and this is because of the increase in sales. The company’s strong performance increased its stock price from $46 in 2013 to $124 in 2014. This indicates that their brand has been more successful each year. 9. The three things that Kevin Plank and Under Armor management needs to address is globalizing, product expansion, and demographics. 10. Recommendations to address globalization, is to develop more factories and outlets worldwide. Instead of using third-party retailers, they should develop more individual retailers in other places. In order to address product expansion, they should innovate a brand new idea that would reach more customers in a broader range and not just athletes. As for addressing demographics, they should try targeting various new places and establish a great brand presence there through advertising and marketing. These recommendations could help them level with Nike in the strength assessment.
Porter’s Five Forces is defined as threats of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, power of buyers, the threat of substitutes and rivalry among existing competitors. New entrants into the industry aim to gain market share from rivals, so the intensity of competition may require to make changes on current strategy of marketing to maintain existing market share. The bargaining power of suppliers is one of the threats on the industry where price changes or product quality by suppliers can impact the profitability. Therefore, it is important for the companies to keep alternate suppliers or a contract to ensure prices, quality and quantity of the product so to avoid the company's supply from falling behind. The power of buyers can force the companies to lower the prices and offer different type products and service. Buyer can threaten the company with the competitors which may cause a negative impact on the bottom line to the companies. Thus, it is important to create a loyalty market share to avoid this threat. The threat of substitutes increases when another industry offers a similar product or services to customers within the same industry with a lower price. In this case, the industry profitability sinks since the product is available at a better price. This threat forces most competitors to price match or better performance. Rivalry among existing competitors ...
Rivalry among established firms is fierce. There are several factors that illustrate this: established market players (6.1). The product is highly standardized and the switching costs of the customers are low. Players are aggressive (6.2)
...t Bosch GmbH, Tenneco and Honeywell. The demand for the products depends on the competitive atmosphere, including the timely development and introduction of new and competitive products and the company’s response to downward pricing to sustain competition. Factors including changes in customer order patterns and competitors’ new products could impact the company’s competitive ability. (Cummins)
Degree of Rivalry - Very High to Intense – Multiple competitors, high strategic stakes, innovation often easily imitated, and low switching costs for consumers
Competition Competitive forces are the pressures put on a Business by other organizations which are competing to increase their share of the same market. The main competitors for Richer Sounds are broken into 4 main groups: 1. Large chain stores. E.g. Curry’s, Dixon’s and Comet 2. Small specialist shops 3.
• Discussing the two forces of competition, which are threat of new entrants and threat of substitutes, and identifying the most significant of those forces for McDonald’s Corporation.
The reason consumers select Under Armour is because the brand is innovative. They’re constantly creating new products. Under Armour is the originator of performance apparel. That is what attracted their first customers, their present customer, and future customers. Add that with their marketing, and that is what helps make the company what it is today.
Nike’s goal is to remain unique and different from others in terms of the items offered on the market. Arguably, Nike belongs to a monopolistically competitive market as there only a few organizations with the ability to regulate the amount charged for their product which means they cannot make their prices high as this is likely to make customers move on to other available choices (Nike, Inc., 2012). However, Nike can find a balance between the prices to charge for their products and remaining competitive with other companies in the industry. Nike has formed a distinction between the appearance and performance of their footwear and that of their competitors. Although products are differentiated from other companies, they still influence each other because they are items of the same
Under Armour is a leading athletic clothing line directed towards the overall athlete who is looking for the most comfort during extracurricular activities. The mission of the company is, "to provide the world with technically advanced products engineered with exclusive fabric construction, supreme moisture management, and proven innovation. In short, every Under Armour product is doing something for you; it's making you better."
The sports apparel and accessories industry has a highly competitive market. Businesses are constantly competing for elite athletes to sponsor, raw materials, and every opportunity to expand. Under Armour is able to not only survive but thrive in this market because of their ability to think outside of the box. They are constantly creating new and exciting products that help athletes everywhere.
More competition in lower trade as other firms will try to convince that their product is better than K2-products.
Porter has identified five competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. These forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. The objective of corporate strategy should be to modify these competitive forces in a way that improves the position of the organization. Porters model supports analysis of the driving forces in an industry. Based on the information derived from the Five Forces Analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of their industry.
Porter’s competitive forces model includes five forces that need to be analysed. These forces include the intensity of rivalry from traditional competitors, threat of new market entrants, threat of substitute products and services, bargaining power of customers and bargaining power of suppliers (Laudon & Laudon, 2007). See diagram below;
New entrants to an industry, with a desire to gain market share, will put pressure on prices, costs and capital needed to compete. It can affect the profit potential.
These five forces include: bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of consumers, competitive rivalry, threat of substitution, threat of new entry. The bargaining power of suppliers, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entries are low for AVON, while the bargaining power of consumers and competitive rivalry is high. The beauty industry is less impacted by a recession; Brazil being a prime example. Competition is competitive in all markets both domestic and foreign. AVON entered the Brazilian market before the competition, but is now battle grounds for entry between L’Oréal and Sephora. AVON is the number one company for direct selling method and marketing (AVON, 2016). Porter’s five forces are similar between domestic and foreign