Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The long term and short term causes for ww1
How nationalism led to ww1
Impact of imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The long term and short term causes for ww1
Ultra-Nationalism as the Fundamental Factor Leading to the Outbreak of the First World War
There are several factors which caused the outbreak of the
First World War, namely ultra-nationalism, neo-imperialismæ–°å¸åœ‹ä¸»ç¾©, the
armament raceè»å‚™ç«¶è³½ and Alliance SystemåŒç›Ÿåˆ¶åº¦. Among these factors, to a
certain extent在æŸç¨‹åº¦ä¸Š, ultra-nationalism can be viewed被視為 as the
fundamental factor leading to the outbreak of the First World War.
Hans Kohn describes nationalism as "a state of mindæ€ç¶ç‹€æ…‹ in which the
supreme loyaltyæœ€å¤§çš„æ•ˆå¿ of the individual個人 is felt to be due toå‘è‘— the
nation-state". Before 1870, nationalism in Europe meant the desire of
a nation for territorial unification統一 or independence rather than
foreign rule. After 1870, however, nationalism became extreme極端.
Ultra-nationalism means that a nation-state should expandæ“´å¼µ to obtain
glory光榮 and self-interestsç§åˆ©, even at expense犧牲 of other nations.
Ultra-nationalist movements during the period 1871-1914 referred to
Pan-Slavism泛斯拉夫主義, Pan-Germanism泛日耳曼主義, the Greater Serbia
Movement大塞爾ç¶äºžé‹å‹• and the French revengeå ±å¾© movement against Germany. As
for Pan-Slavism, Russia as the largest Slav斯拉夫 state claimedè²ç¨± that
she had a historic mission使命 to liberate解放 all the brother Slav states
in the Balkans巴爾幹åŠå³¶ from Turkish and Austrian rule. S.B. Fay points
out, in fact, that the foreign policy of Russia in the 19th and early
20th centuries was "to seek尋求 free passage進出 to the straits海峽 on which
her economic life depended". So Russia was eager to fish in troubled
...
... middle of paper ...
...ue to say that all the causes of the outbreak of
the First World War were made by ultra-nationalism. The Industrial
Revolution created demands for raw materials原料, markets and places for
re-investmentå†æŠ•è³‡, which all added oil to the fireç«ä¸ŠåŠ æ²¹ of
neo-imperialism. France competed with Germany for Morocco because
Morocco was rich in minerals礦物 and agriculture. After the Sarajevo
Assassination, both Britain and France tried to calm downå†·éœ the
Russian anger憤怒. Why Britain declared war on Germany on 4 August 1914
was not because of ultra-nationalism, but because the German
invasion入侵 of Belgium threatened her own national security安全.
To conclude, nevertheless雖然如æ¤, to a large extent ultra-nationalism was
the fundamental and most important cause of the outbreak of the First
World War.
Imperialism was a competitive force that inevitably led to crises among rival nations. Due to severe opposition and competition as well as discontent in colonized regions, imperialism can be considered a major factor leading to World War I. Nationalism has long been a cause of disunity throughout European nations. Nationalism in Germany was especially prominent. With powerful military forces and an industrial outlook, Germany thrived. A sense of national unity was dispersed throughout the empire and gave Germany the assurance it needed to expand.
Nationalism is another main cause of the War of 1898. Nationalism is defined by Merriam-Webster as “a feeling that people have of being loyal to and proud of their country often with the belief that it is better and more important than other countries”...
It may seem like wars start abruptly, with little cause, but usually there is a bigger story. New policies, lack of equality, military influence, and too much government involvement usually stir up the peace initially. These turn the country or area into a ‘powder keg’, ready to explode into war at the smallest spark. Although the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was the spark of World War I, policies at the time like nationalism and militarism were the underlying causes of the war.
National interest was a key factor in the explosive beginning of World War One. By looking at the Naval Arms Race, the People’s Revolt in Austria-Hungary and European alliances, it can be shown that national interest was a significant factor in contributing to World War One. The ultra nationalistic views of many countries overruled their ability to act in a just and logical manner. It was in the years following the formation of the Triple Alliance in which the desire and craving for power grew, and created insincere relationships and unrealistic portrayals of other countries intentions.
There were many immediate and underlying or fundamental causes of World War I. The difference between an underlying and immediate cause is that an underlying cause develops over a long period of time and indirectly leads to a specific event, and an immediate cause is a specific short-term event that directly leads to another event or series of events. While the immediate cause of World War I was the assassination of Francis Ferdinand, the archduke of Austria, by a Serbian member of the Black Hand secret society, there were various basic causes of the war. Three of them were nationalism, alliances between European powers, and militarism. Nationalism is a devotion and loyalty to one’s own nation, with a primary emphasis on furthering its interests as opposed to those of other countries.
Nationalism played a huge role in starting World War I. Nationalism is when one nation has a lot of pride in their nation or country. Nationalism usually shown by the flags, national anthems, and other signature items. (Brown, B. (2009, April 23). Causes of world war I (great ...
The rise of European nationalism in the 19th Century brought with it an overabundance amount of change that would definitively modify the course of history. The rise of nationalism in one country would rouse greater nationalism in another, which would in turn, motivate even greater nationalism in the first, progressively intensifying the cycle that eventually concluded in a World War. Nationalism as an ideology produced international competition which inspired absolute allegiance to an individual’s nation state. The ideology was fueled by industrial commerce and imperialistic developments which led to nation-states pursuits of outcompeting rival nations.
Prior to and after WWI the world saw a rise in nationalistic sentiments. The Middle East was not immune to this new ideology. Although Arab Nationalism had a start in the Ottoman Empire, its rise among the masses did not begin until after WWI. While a total rise in Arab Nationalism became apparent on the Arabian Peninsula, a separate nationalist movement began in Palestine as a way to combat a unique and repressive situation. In Palestine the British mandate, along with British support, and the world's support for Zionist immigration into Palestine, caused a number of European Zionists to move into the country. These factors created an agitated atmosphere among Palestinians. Although there was more than one factor in creating a Palestinian-centered Arab Nationalism, the mounting Zionist immigration was among the most prevalent of forces.
Nationalism, the love and support of one's country, has always existed. In this era, however, it was to take part in the creation of one of the most famous wars in history. Since so much pride was devoted to countries, it made the possibilities of peace between past rivals less probable. It also meant that most nations, especially the great powers, would rather fight a war than back down from a rival's diplomatic provocation. In effect, nationalism was also a contributing factor to the alliance system. No country feels comfortable being in a war alone, and with the growing militaries in almost every country, allies provided much comfort.
The first world war started in August 1914. The assassination of the Austrian archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife directly triggered the war, but it is believed by most that this was only a spark to start the war, and that there were many other factors leading up to it. These factors include a strong sense of nationalism and militarism within the countries, and the fight for the Balkans between Russia and Austria-Hungary. With imperialism already causing tensions between countries, some believe that the war was inevitable. There is ultimately no main cause or event that triggered the war, but a lot of small tensions that built up over time, eventually coming to a head and starting the war.
Nationalism is way of thinking both political and socially to create a community united by: history, ethnicity, religions, common culture, and language. Numerous effects occurred while establishing a Nationalist community, some effects were a long term impact on Nationalism, and other was short term impacts on Nationalism.
There are many reasons why World War One occurred in 1914, many are complex and remain controversial which is why the matter has been disputed to this day by historians all over the world. My theory is that a lot of those reasons and the trigger factor all links to one thing; the alliance system. The alliance system is what made countries oppose each other and become rivals making it the most significant factor. It had an impact on who supported who when Duke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated. This was only the spark that started war in Europe; there were long term causes that contributed to the war and were the origins. This answer will explain the causes focusing on how they contributed to World War One and what the important links are between them.
Once engaged in a war, a country’s militarism will produce fine soldiers ready to drop like dominos on the battlefield, while the nationalism works as fuel providing the naive determination to fight the war. This nave determination and soldier production is why World War One, like every other war, continued with such persistence. But what started World War One? Was it militarism that trained young men since they were kids to become soldiers, nationalism propelling a nation's pride forward, or was it neither? While both of those aspects could be potential reasons, they’re still not the main pillars of cause.
The realism theory describes World War One the best because it is “based on the view that describes the individual as primarily fearful, selfish and power seeking” (Mingst, 2011). WWI was initially a war between two countries, Austria-Hungary and Serbia; but due to assassinations, the strength of alliances, binds by treaties, and increasing security dilemma, more and more countries entered the war until it manifested into a complete World War. Countries increased their weaponry and made other nations apprehensive. Even countries that felt compelled to stay neutral became fearful of the ever increasing power of countries in the war. Countries began to struggle for a balance of power, and the war outbreak was a product of the multi-polarity of power. “World War One by realist perspective, can be described by changes in the European balance of power, with distinctions drawn among the rigid alliances argument, which claims that the war was caused by an inflexible continental bipolarity; the future imbalances argument, which maintains that Germany's fear of Russia's growing power triggered the war; and hegemonic decline, which explains World War I by citing Britain's waning status as a superpower” (Nau, 2011).
Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and geographic proximity ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. In the following essay I will describe many of the consequences of nationalism on European identity, as well as some of the conflicts that it created.