US and NC Constitution Comparison In this essay we will discuss about the US Constitution and the Constitution of North Carolina. The US Constitution being the law of our whole nation as stated in the Supremacy Clause (US.6.2.2). The US constitution was created on September 17, 1787. The NC constitution was created in 1776. Overall, I will discuss the similarities and differences of both constitutions. The constitutions have many similarities yet they are still unique. Both of the constitutions have the three branches of separation of power included in them which are the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches. They have the same rules with them, the legislative can still override the executives veto and leaders can be impeached. The …show more content…
In the US Constitution it states that every state has two Senators (US.1.3.1). In order to be a Senator you must be 30 years of age (US.1.3.3) but in the NC Constitution you only have to be 25 years of age (NC.2.6). In the other house, which is the House of representatives, it states in the US you must be 25 years old (US.1.2.2) while in the NC you must be a qualified voter. When we compare the leaders we know that the president is our country’s leader and the governor is only the governor of the state they reside in. The president can only be president for 2 terms, they negotiate and sign treaties with other countries and live in the White House (US.2.2.2). The governor has to live in the state they govern but they can serve for more than 2 terms if not consecutive. They have different rules in becoming whichever, if someone wants to be president they have to be a natural born citizen, be 35 years old, and 14 years of being a US resident (US.2.1). To become a governor, you must be 30 years or older, a resident of the state for at least 2 years, and a US citizen for 5 years. In conclusion, both of the constitutions are similar but they have their differences. One focuses on our individual rights while the other on the state. The states have reserved powers and their own governments. In the end, the governments are made to separate power and protect our rights and freedoms. What more could we ask
There were many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. At the end of the American Revolution the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose such as: How should power be divided between local and national governments? How should laws be made, and by whom? Who should be authorized to govern those laws? How could the government be designed to protect the unalienable individual rights? Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. There were so many changes made and very little remained the same.
The United States Constitution and Texas Constitution are similar, but not indistinguishable. One can see that the constitution was made to prevent tyranny in the states from the idea of the federalists who wanted to build a strong form of government that gave people rights without giving their representatives too much power. In the U.S. Constitution, the elites made the decision that they would form a representative government with a Bill of Rights in order for the anti-federalists to agree to sign. The constitution established a stronger form of government, which helped the economic and social tensions. The constitution consists of: the preamble, which states the general principles for a government, the Bill
In 1918, while the rest of Europe was still engaged in World War I, a newly formed communist government was developing in Russia. Much like 18th century Americans, they had just managed to overthrow what was viewed as a tyrannical government and hoped to form a new nation free of the injustices of the previous rule. Both countries wrote a new constitution as well as a declaration of rights to facilitate this, but their respective documents had vast differences. These disparities stemmed from differences in the ideologies of the new governments. The primary objectives of the Russian Declaration of Rights of the Working and Exploited People and the later constitution were the “abolition of all exploitation of man by man, complete elimination of the division of society into classes, merciless suppression of the exploiters, socialist organization of society, and victory of socialism in all countries.” Americans wanted equality of opportunity and personal freedom instead of the social equality desired by the Russians. The American constitution and Bill of Rights were created to protect personal liberties and individual freedom while the Russians were more concerned with the welfare and equality of the population as a whole. This difference is partially due to the differences in the conditions leading to revolution in each country. The American Revolution was initiated by the wealthy in response to what they considered unfair treatment by a foreign ruler while the Russian revolution was instigated by the poor in reaction to centuries of oppression and exploitation by the wealthy within their own country.
On a final note, both Constitutions were created for the same purpose namely, to withhold the fundamental principles of a nation. They are governed by a group of people who limit and regulate the basic rules. Texas has had a constitution for each political condition of its history.
One of the key differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation is in the way that they set up the Legislature. In the Articles, it is established as a unicameral legislature which it refers to as a Congress. The Constitution on the other hand establishes a bicameral legislature with an upper house, the Senate, and a lower house, the House of Representatives. The reason for this change was because different states wanted the number of representatives to be selected in different ways. Under the Articles of Confederation all States were represented equally and the bigger states felt that they should be getting more say in the decisions that the Country would be making. Needless to say the smaller states did not readily agree to this.
In comparing the Articles of Confederation with the U.S constitution that was produced by the federal convention in 1787, it is important to note that the U.S operated under both documents. During March 1, 1781, the Articles of Confederation went into effect when it was ratified by Maryland. However, the U.S constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation as soon as it was ratified on June 21, 1788 by New Hampshire. The main difference between the Articles of Confederations and the U.S Constitution is that the constitution didn’t force the laws, but established the why of the constitution. In establishing the why, it warranted the farmers to work on the government being better than the Articles of Confederations. They wanted the government
The United States' Constitution is one the most heralded documents in our nation's history. It is also the most copied Constitution in the world. Many nations have taken the ideals and values from our Constitution and instilled them in their own. It is amazing to think that after 200 years, it still holds relevance to our nation's politics and procedures. However, regardless of how important this document is to our government, the operation remains time consuming and ineffective. The U.S. Constitution established an inefficient system that encourages careful deliberation between government factions representing different and sometimes competing interests.
Constitution was the first constitution constructed during the Constitutional Convention and ratified in 1787. This document improved the national government structure through the fundamental laws. The Bill of Rights were implemented to protect basic individual rights, as well as the civil liberties that are implied even though not stated in the Constitution. The Constitution provided separation of powers within the three branches so no branch would have more jurisdiction over the other. These three branches consisted of the legislative which emerged to a bicameral congress, the executive which now be vested in the President, and the judicial which is the Supreme Court where the judges are appointed by the President and approved through Congress. In order to avoid one branch overpowering others, the constitution proposed checks and balances. The Congress is compromised of the Senate and the House of Representatives. After a two year term a member of the representative house must uphold popular vote during elections to take position, and the amount of members is based on the states’ population; whereas after a six year term two new senators appointed by state council to each state take position. During the voting process the senate is granted one vote per representative and senator. In addition, Congress gained the right to levy taxes on individuals which boots the economy to allow Congress access to gather an army and handle issues regarding the
The two documents have much in common, but they differ more than they do resemble each other, when one looks at the details. Comparing them can give us insight of why the Constitution is a more functional and productive method of government than the Articles of Confederation.
While fixing the issues of the Articles of Confederation, the new constitution also led to fighting between different groups, and making compromises which led to ultimately winning ratification. The US constitution was written with great detail and speculation on the economy. In producing Constitution, it provides the laws and rights of the people of the land and directs its attention to many of the problems this country has. This Constitution was greater at the central government power and was weaker at the state level. Congress was given the power to tax, regulate trade between the states, raise an army, etc. A three-branch government was established in which a judicial branch handled disputes in a federal court system, a President the head of the executive branch, and a legislative
United States Constitution and Hawaii State Constitution has several commonalities and differences. The United States Constitution provides the blueprint on how the federal government along with states should function in a general prospective viewpoint. The Hawaii States Constitution take in consideration form a direct viewpoint on how a state should operator and conduct business from areas such as education, elections, and public health. Both of the documents are structured using articles to organize information. The United States Constitution has VII articles and the Hawaii State Constitution has XVIII articles.
The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States. Many problems however did come up discussing the Articles, the reason why is mainly that each person would fear that one would have more power than the other. Later on the constitution was then ratified on March 1, 1781. The main powers of Congress included: the power to declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and manage relations with Indians. Still, Congress did not have the power to levy taxes and regulate trade, which then led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 for the creation of new federal laws. “Congress felt the need for a stronger union and a government powerful
The biggest similarity the documents have is the cause for the documents to be written. Both were written for the purpose of freedom and equality. Although the documents were written for the same purpose, the declaration of Independence was written to free the United states from Great Britain. The declaration of Independence abolished ties with the crown, while on the other hand, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was written to give rights and equality to the citizens. Both documents grant citizens the right of being free and equal. In the Declaration of Independence, this was stated when said, “all men are created equal.”(Using APA, 1776, para. 2, Declaration of Independence) Although in the Declaration of the rights of man, freedom and equality is stated differently as the document said “men are born free and remain equal in rights.”(Using APA, 1789, Art. 1, DRMC) The Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of man, are two very similar, as well as very different
First of all, there are few similar articles in both of the two constitutions. For example, they have articles that guarantee people’s rights and value. In case of
Key differences between the two systems include the extent to which the powers of government are separated functionally between branches of government, how each system defines the conditions for removing the executive and dissolving the government, and the influence that the governing system has on the structures developed by the parties in the legislature.