Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the Court of Justice of the EU within the EU legal system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Summary • The ECJ can only give rulings on the interpretation of the Treaties and validity of secondary EU legislation, under Article 267 TFEU. • References are either discretionary or mandatory. • Bodies that can make a reference have to be courts or tribunals that satisfy the Dorsch criteria. Conclusions • If there is a judicial remedy available from a certain UK court, then that specific court has discretion on making a reference. • If there is no judicial remedy available (usually the court in question being the Supreme Court) then a reference would be mandatory. • Before making a reference, the courts have to take into account the case law guidelines. Recommendations • The UK courts will have to be certain of the issues that would be referred, especially since the procedure is time-consuming and expensive. • Guidelines should always be considered in detail, to ensure that making a reference is the right choice for the specific case. Introduction The aim of this report is to explain the preliminary reference procedure, under Article 267 TFEU, and how it relates to UK legislation, to discuss its guidelines, present potential criticism on the matter and provide some recommendations on dealing with preliminary references. Preliminary References Preliminary references are used on matters concerning EU legislation such as: 1. The interpretation of the Treaties ; 2. The validity of EU measures, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union . These can either be discretionary or mandatory . The function of the preliminary reference procedure is to make sure the interpretation and validity of the EU law is the same across all member states. Who can make a reference? Any court or tribunal can make a reference on EU legislation to the... ... middle of paper ... ...Gomis and others C-167/94 ECR I-1023 Criminal Proceedings against Saddik C-458/93 [1995] ECR I-511 Da Costa v Nederlands Case 28-30/62 [1963] ECR 31 Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Bundesbaugesellschaft mbH C-54/96 [1997] ECR I-496 Foglia v Novello No 1 Case 104/79 [1980] ECR 745 Foto-Frost v Hauptzollamt Lübeck-Ost Case 314/85 [1987] ECR 4199 Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association v Ireland Cases 36 and 71/80 [1981] ECR 735 Magnavision v General Optical Council No. 2 [1987] 2 CMLR 262 Meilicke v ADV/ORGA AG Case C-83/91 [1992] ECR I-4871 R v International Stock Exchange of the UK and the Republic of Ireland Ltd, ex p Else (1982) Ltd and others [1993] 2 CMLR 677 R v Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain [1987] 3 CMLR 951 R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame [1989] 3 CMLR 1 Rheinmühlen v Einfuhr Cases 146 and 166/73 [1974] ECR 33
In Palgo Holdings v Gowans , the High Court considered the distinction between a security in the form of a pawn or pledge and a security in the form of a chattel mortgage. The question was whether section 6 of the Pawnbrokers and Second-hand Dealers Act 1996 (NSW) (‘the 1996 Pawnbrokers Act’) extended to a business that structured its loan agreements as chattel mortgages. In a four to one majority (Kirby J dissenting) the High Court found that chattel mortgages fell outside the ambit of section 6 of the 1996 Pawnbrokers Act. However, beyond the apparent simplicity of this decision, the reasoning of the majority raises a number of questions. Was it a “turning back to literalism” as Kirby J suggested, or was it simply a case where the court declares that parliament has missed its target?
The principle of Supremacy of EU Law was established by the European Court of Justice in a series of cases. This principle authorizes EU Law to take precedence over
The General Court. "General Laws." : CHAPTER 265, Section 37. 2014. Web. 20 Apr. 2014. .
Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the operation of the legal system and the manner in which the powers of the state are exercised. However, since the Parliament is capable of making any law whatsoever, the concept of the rule of law poses a contradiction to the principle of parliamentary supremacy, entailing that Parliament is not bound by the Rule of Law, and it can exercise power arbitrarily.
Andrews N, Strangers to Justice No Longer: The Reversal of the Privity Rule under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (2001) 60 The Cambridge Law Journal 353
Regulations have general application that means that all the member states have to adopt the regulation; the member state is expected to adopt the whole regulation. Regulations are directly applicable which means that the "individuals have rights that they can enforce in their own name through national courts"(2).
[8] NHS Trust A. NHS Trust A v M and NHS Trust B v H [2001].
courts can be confusing due to the numerous types of courts such as state, federal, supreme,
Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is what is known as an ‘Original Precedent’ that is a case that creates and applies a new rule. Precedents are to be found in Law Reports and are divided up into ‘Binding’ and ‘Persuasive’.
The European Communities Act provides that s 2(1) has direct effect of EU law provisions which suggests EU law regulations are automatically binding upon parliament without the need of creating new ...
The case of R v Hughes will be used throughout this essay to supplement ...
1.The strict supremacy of statute over judicial decisions and a tradition of literalism in statutory interpretation, 2. Where no legislation exists, the courts are bound by the doctrine of precedent in accordance with a strict hierarchy of judicial authority, 3. In the absence of a relevant precedent, the judges will be guided by legal principle and reasoning by analogy, and 4. There is clear way of distinguishing the ratio of a case…
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31
GWEBU v Minister of Correctional Services and Others , (1) SACR 191 (GNP 2014 ).
Researching and Making the Court Papers: The Lawyers have to brief the court about the case well in advance about the issues to be discussed.