Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Turner syndrome
The crux of the case at hand is that a woman is in the late stage of her first trimester of pregnancy, and at this point she has newly discovered that the baby she is carrying carries the genetic ailment of Turner’s Syndrome. This is a genetic ailment that the case has described as being very noticeable and symptomatic from the patient who has this disease, but ultimately the women who have this are not likely to suffer from inability to function at a very basic level in life. There seems to not be many social limitations or mental limitations, and for the most part this disease will not revoke their chances of living a good life. From the description of the case, it doesn’t really seem like there is much of a moral dilemma posed to any party. …show more content…
He goes on to discuss the moral issues with abortion, but in the frame of this topic he discusses why it is even more problematic when abortion is performed for genetic abnormalities. Kass expresses that he doesn’t like the impact that the field of amniocentesis has made on the treatment of children who are prenatally diagnoses with defects, taking to the extreme conclusion that he wouldn’t have been allowed to be born during this era. He also decried the idea that children who would be exceptionally allowed to be born when they are given such diagnoses before their birth would not be viewed with the right to life, and the attitude of the public would essentially be one in support of eugenic policies. Hence, he would most likely not support such a practice to continue at the wide scale he claims it is, and he would therefore not suggest for it to be done in this case either. The woman in the case had her test done by a amniocentesist, who made that diagnosis. Given that the option of abortion in this case is controversial enough to begin with, it would go without saying that he, not being a fan of genetic abortion, would especially not advise that
For example, this girl may get kicked out of her house, or won’t even be able to support the baby financially. She might even lose her education, just trying to take care of the child. I support the idea that she learns and understands from her mistake and ultimately it was her decision to do what she wanted with her body. Rather than put her in a state of repression, the results from her experience would be social maturity and evolution. With abortion, none of these issues would be a concern, accept, then she would have to deal with the emotional part of determining to terminate the fetus.
Abortion is a considered a sensitive topic in society; as a result it is not frequently mentioned or discussed. However; Marquis has decided to voice his opinion on the matter.
Laura Purdy gives the example of Huntington’s disease, which she relates it to all other genetic disorders, it is an autosomal dominant trait, meaning that it has a fifty percent chance of being passed down from generation to generation. Huntington’s disease occurs between the ages of thirty too fifty. It is a progressive disease that leads to constant contractions and irregular movements of the body eventually resulting in death. Purdy’s reasoning for her claim that it is immoral to reproduce without prenatal screening is because of genetic diseases like Huntington’s disease, it makes an average person become subjected to prolong suffering. Purdy also thinks that passing down a genetic disease like Huntington’s without their consent and risking their welfare is wrong because we aren’t taking the future being into account.
The word abortion brings out a variety of attitudes & perceptions amongst people. The topic is surrounded by emotion and empathy, which often creates a divide, those who view abortion as permissible and those who do not. In “Bioethics Before Birth," Tooley and Marquis provide their arguments on abortion. Their arguments share some similarities but their viewpoints and delivery set them apart. I will evaluate and compare the differences and similarities in their arguments.
Susan has a successful career, but she wants to have a family also and balance the two. She finally becomes pregnant after trying for a long time, but tests show that the baby will be born with Down syndrome. She has been trying for so long, and now the doctor is recommending an abortion.
Warren rejects emotional appeal in a very Vulcan like manner; devout to reason and logic and in doing so has created a well-written paper based solely on this rational mindset. Works Cited Warren, Mary Anne, and Mappes, D. DeGrazia. On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. Biomedical Ethics 4th (1996): 434-440. Print.
The reason for this is due to the fact that the child is curable, all the child would need is to have surgery to make them all better. So the AMA would never permit it because the child is not facing death. The main reason why the child would even have to die by the parents thinking is because they just have down syndrome. Which with the doctors say in the matter seems to be pushing the parents into making this decision. When in fact it should be up to the parents only. So if the parent’s decided to let the child die then they are intentionally killing the child which has nothing to do with euthanasia. When reading this I felt that Rachels is talking about morals and what is right and wrong thing to do. Like is it okay to just let a infant die from something that is curable just because they have down syndrome, or let them live like that for the rest of their
First, doctors should have the right to refuse performing abortions because it is against their moral beliefs. According to Kaveny,
...ther’s sovereignty over her body outweigh the right of an unborn child to live. The answers to these questions are very diverse as a result of the diversity of the American society. With the issue of abortion, one’s attitude toward it is going to be based on many things such as religious background and personal morals. There is no black and white answer to the abortion issue. Luckily we live in a country where we are able to decide for ourselves whether something is morally right or wrong. Thus, ultimately, the choice is ours. As with the many other ethical issues which we are faced with in our society, it is hard to come to a concrete answer until we are personally faced with that issue. All we can do is make an effort to know all of the aspects which are involved so that we may be able to make a sound decision if we were faced with this problem in our own lives.
I think [17e] that the lady should have the baby and then put it up for adoption, but then there are also a lot of other people that think that the child will suffer psychologically, because in a lot of cases the child will never get to meet their biological parents. Even if the baby doesn't meet their parents they will not suffer as badly as it would if it were brutal. slaughtered in the womb, this brings up a biological issue: abortion is killing a human life.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Would you want someone to take away the ability to live from you? Or can you imagine not having this life? Babies or Embryos, on the other hand, don’t have any choices like you under the mother’s womb. They can’t resist or even stand up for themselves, if the mother decides to get an abortion. Abortion is an option given to women who become pregnant. Many consider it, and many decide to have one. They believe that it is their right to choose whether or not abortion is right for them, and the baby is just helpless. Their whole future has vanished from this world. Considering the Marquis’ arguments on abortion, syllogism, and some philosophy like Kantian, I believe that abortion is immoral.
A young women who just recently married at the age of 24 is six months along in her pregnancy. By her eighth month, she has came across complications. Within one week, they continue to get progressively worse. She is eventually rushed to the hospital. There her symptoms are studied by medical professionals. She soon is told that her complications are so severe that they might cost her her life. She is now faced with a choice. A medical dilemma of saving her life with the use of an abortion, or the moral dilemma of saving her childs life. What is right?
For example, a mother who opts to abort lives a life full of misery and guilt following her unethical action. The same issue is explored by Kant, where he argues that frequent abortions would make the human race extinct. Therefore, not irrational or good to the society. Lastly, they argue that abortion denies the fetus the right to life which is granted by the Human Rights Commission. Judith Thomson argument that a human embryo is a person indicates that he or she has the right to life, and no one has a right to terminate it (Baird & Stuart, 78). Therefore, abortion is unacceptable, irrational and immoral action to
In such positions, the resolution to terminate a pregnancy may be argued as the most ethical choice. The mother is also considered to have a reasonable level of ethical responsibility to the fetus, because she did not take enough precautions to ensure avoid conception (Cline, 2014). The mother’s ethical responsibility to the fetus may not be enough to deprive her of choice of abortion; it may be enough to ascertain when an abortion can be ethically selected (Cline, 2014). When a woman does not wish to carry an abortion to term, it will be unethical for law or any other person to force them to do so.... ...
To conclude, while Gensler does make a sound Kantian argument against the morality of abortion through his use of the logical consistency and universability test, he actually fails to prove that maxims regarding abortion cannot be universalized. As Feldman argues in her work, a rational agent can be both happy to be alive and also find the idea of his/her mother having a right to choose what happens to her body and hence acknowledging the possibility of his/her being aborted as a fetus to be acceptable. Thus, Gensler’s argument seems illogical with regard to Kantian ethics and what is more, he even fails to view the pregnant woman as an active moral agent and neglects her reasons for choosing the abortion. Further, through her discussion of