Turkeys In The Kitchen Analysis

647 Words2 Pages

The Proclivity of Relatable Humor In “Turkeys in the Kitchen,” an essay written by Dave Barry, humor is used as an aid to make a point about the usefulness of men after Women’s Liberation. “A Plague of Tics,” a personal narrative written by David Sedaris, uses a different kind of humor to explain the reasoning behind his behavior. Through these two essays and their author’s personal experiences, humor is presented as a device to captivate reader’s attention and declare the author’s intended meaning.
Both “A Plague of Tics” and “Turkeys in the Kitchen” present humorous situations in which the authors partake in and learn something. Barry expresses his confusion as to how to peel turnips, a simple task, in a comical way by posing multiple questions. “1. Which ones are the turnips? 2. Do you have to wash them first? 3. Do you have to peel them (Then why did you just peel them!?) What do you peel them with[?]” (page 74). “A Plague of Tics” is an essay regarding the behavior of a man assumed to have Tourettes or some similar disease with the symptoms of tics. Sedaris also amusingly questions his teacher’s theoretical comments in an attempt to explain his ignorance. “Why come here and lick my switches when she never used the one she had? Maybe she was drunk” (page 362). Sedaris also amusingly questions his teacher’s theoretical comments in an attempt to explain his ignorance. Sedaris and Barry’s use of humor is beneficial to the essays, as they invite the reader to come for the comical tone and stay for the thesis.
While both author’s use humor, Dave Barry purposely provides relatable comical …show more content…

They vary in the kind of humor they use and the impression it gives the reader. Dave Barry and David Sedaris captivate the attention of the readers through their comical inner monologues. Through their enticing personal experiences, humor is used to strengthen their

Open Document